Corruption in public administrations undermines good governance and distorts policymaking. It has toppled governments in both developed and developing countries. To prevent corruption, countries implement measures to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight in public institutions and reduce opportunities for improper influence. These include clarifying procedures, depersonalizing processes, implementing e-government services, reforming public procurement systems, generating clear regulations, and increasing civil society participation in anti-corruption efforts. Preventing corruption requires cooperation across government, civil society, and the private sector.
Corruption in public administrations undermines good governance and distorts policymaking. It has toppled governments in both developed and developing countries. To prevent corruption, countries implement measures to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight in public institutions and reduce opportunities for improper influence. These include clarifying procedures, depersonalizing processes, implementing e-government services, reforming public procurement systems, generating clear regulations, and increasing civil society participation in anti-corruption efforts. Preventing corruption requires cooperation across government, civil society, and the private sector.
Corruption in public administrations undermines good governance and distorts policymaking. It has toppled governments in both developed and developing countries. To prevent corruption, countries implement measures to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight in public institutions and reduce opportunities for improper influence. These include clarifying procedures, depersonalizing processes, implementing e-government services, reforming public procurement systems, generating clear regulations, and increasing civil society participation in anti-corruption efforts. Preventing corruption requires cooperation across government, civil society, and the private sector.
Corruption in public administrations undermines good governance and distorts policymaking. It has toppled governments in both developed and developing countries. To prevent corruption, countries implement measures to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight in public institutions and reduce opportunities for improper influence. These include clarifying procedures, depersonalizing processes, implementing e-government services, reforming public procurement systems, generating clear regulations, and increasing civil society participation in anti-corruption efforts. Preventing corruption requires cooperation across government, civil society, and the private sector.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC or read online from Scribd
Download as doc
You are on page 1of 5
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that corruption undermines good governance, distorts public policy, misallocates resources and hurts the poor. Controlling corruption requires cooperation between the state, civil society and private sector.
Some measures taken include clarifying procedures, reducing discretion, controlling contacts between officials and citizens, bringing procurement under specific regimes, and increasing accountability through audits and inquiries.
Corruption damages a country because decisions are made for private gain rather than public benefit. It undermines development and particularly hurts the poor.
PREVENTING CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS.
OVER THE LAST few years, the issue of corruption--the abuse of public office for private gain--has attracted renewed interest, both among academics and policymakers. There are a number of reasons why this topic has come under fresh scrutiny. Corruption scandals have toppled governments in both major industrial countries and developing countries. (Paolo Mauro, 1996, "The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure.)
Corruption is essentially termed as an "impairment of integrity, virtue or
moral principle; depravity, decay, and/or an inducement to wrong by improper or unlawful means, a departure from the original or from what is pure or correct, and/or an agency or influence that corrupts."(www.wikipedia.com). From that we knew, Corruption actions have felled down governments in both major industrial countries and developing countries. Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for personal benefit. It is damaging to a country because decisions are taken not for the public but to serve private property. Corruption undermines good governance, fundamentally distorts public policy, leads to misallocation of resources, and particularly hurts the poor. Controlling it is only possible with the cooperation of a wide range of stakeholders in the integrity system, including most importantly, the state, civil society, and the private sector. (Jeremy Pope, 2000). Prevention of corruption in the public service ranks high on many countries’ is changing the agendas. So far, different levels of effort and achievement have taken place.
Several actions should be taken to prevent corruption in Malaysia. First
and for most Public management system should play their role. Public management system measures the integrity and competence of the public service at the level of the individual public servant. In addition, most countries strive to inoculate the public administration against undue interference at the institutional level. The measures taken aim at clarifying procedures and at reducing carefulness. This is impossible or impractical, ways of controlling the contacts between public officials and citizens are employed to prevent corruption. Particularly corruption-prone sectors, such as public procurement, are brought under specific regimes and procedures that assure oversight and transparency. Audit and other forms of inquiry and survey add to the efforts to increase accountability of the public service. This clearly stated in an article entitled Country Reports on Human Rights Practices Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor on February 28, 2005.
Other than that, undue influence should be prevent. Institutional and
organizational settings largely determine to what extent administrative procedures are subject to undue interference and corruption. Discretion and unclear laws and regulations create opportunities for corruption to happen. Besides making efforts to improve the transparency of legal provisions, countries in the region make every effort to depersonalize administrative processes and diminish client relations. Depersonalized on-line procedures and regular rotation of officials are among the measures most frequently applied to counter these risks. According to an article entitled Anti-corruption action plan for Asia and the Pacific from ANCORR WEB, more and more countries make use of information technology to provide certain services to the public. This approach, often referred as “e-government”, can help reduce opportunities for corruption in several ways. Firstly, on-line transactions depersonalize and standardize the provision of services and leave little room for payment. In addition, the use of computers requires that rules and procedures be standardized and made explicit and thus reduces abuse of discretion and other opportunities for corruption. Moreover, computerized procedures make it possible to track decisions and actions and thus serve as an additional deterrent to corruption. Australia; Hong Kong, China; Korea; Malaysia; Pakistan; the Philippines and Singapore undertake extensive efforts to implement e-government. In Korea, for instance, citizens can monitor in real time the progress of an on-line application for permits and licenses. In Pakistan, the entire tax department is currently being restructured and information technology introduced, with the purpose of reducing contact between tax collectors and taxpayers. In India and Philippines, documents related to public procurement must now be made available on-line. Cambodia also enhances the use of information technology to provide administrative services.
Public procurement is a special corruption-prone area. To keep corruption
at bay, procurement systems must be based on transparency, competition and objective criteria in decision making. Throughout the region, reform of public procurement procedures has been widely identified as a priority. Most countries have enacted statutes governing public procurement such as Australia, Bangladesh, Fiji Islands, Hong Kong, China, India and Malaysia. Some are currently reforming public procurement procedures. Bangladesh has recently issued procurement guidelines and tasked a particular government division inter alia to monitor and evaluate government procurement processes. Samoa is developing manuals to standardize procurement and enhance transparency. Current reform efforts in the region focus primarily on introducing procurement via the internet. This statement clearly maintained in the web site www.worldbank.org.
The selection process follows legal rules or regulations. In some countries,
the awarding of tender is subject to public monitoring, as in Korea and the Philippines. Korea assures transparency of the bidding procedures through public disclosure via the internet of documents such as bidding notices and information on the final selection of the contractor. In order to further strengthen the application of these rules in practice, a growing number of countries for instance Fiji Islands, Japan, Indonesia, Kazakhstan and the Philippines are establishing disciplinary procedures against public officials involved in wrongdoing in the procurement process. In addition, Japan holds public officers liable for potential damages. These pacts, initially developed by Transparency International, include, for instance, a clause barring the company from business with the government if it fails to comply with the pact’s provisions. To prevent corruption in public administration, we required clear and unambiguous regulatory environment. Clear and verifiable rules and procedures leave less room for corrupt practices. The corruption problem become much more complicated when it is involved private economics activities. Officers in public administration could be misused by the private sectors to hide their illegal activities so that they continue their activities to get more profit. Regarding to this issue, many countries put effort to generate clear and unambiguous regulatory environment with the aim that this corruption problem can be prevent. Some other countries are in the process of improving and streamlining this type of environment, especially with an eye on corruption-prone sectors. Mongolia, for example, has recently streamlined its regulations on licensing of private business activities. According to an article entitled Anti-corruption action plan for Asia and the Pacific from ANCORR WEB, many countries have even practiced this review, entrusting a specific body with screening the existing procedures and issuing recommendations for reform where required. Hong Kong, China, India, Korea, Malaysia, Nepal, Philippines and Singapore have entrusted their apex anti- corruption agencies’ advisory branches with this task. In Japan, the office of the auditor-general is responsible for suggesting reforms to the Government. In India, a genuine Department of Administrative Reform constantly reviews procedures and submits recommendations. In Papua New Guinea, the Public Sector Reform Management Unit reviews the structure of public sector organizations. Nowadays many countries recognize the important role of civil society in reforming the regulatory framework. For instance, Fiji Islands, Korea and Singapore rely on consultation with representatives from the private sector or NGOs to learn about inefficient procedures and administrative weaknesses encountered by the public (OECD Anti-Corruption Division, 2004, updated11 April 2006). As the conclusion, all of us have averseness that corruption is something not good to us. It is a crime that we have to prevent. We should not point certain party as the people who responsible to prevent this problem. We should co- operate whit the responsible party to solve this problem. This is because; it is a dangerous crime which can spoil the future of each nation. As a result all the action that currently followed or planed to be applied have to be much more effective.
