Read The Full Text of The Letter Here.
Read The Full Text of The Letter Here.
Read The Full Text of The Letter Here.
Dear Minister:
We are writing to request an opportunity to meet with you to discuss your Government’s
recent decision to discontinue the Census long-form questionnaire and replace it with a new
voluntary questionnaire, the National Household Survey.
We are greatly concerned about this decision. Loss of the long-form Census infor-
mation will cause considerable economic and social costs. The data are a key part of the
decision-making processes of businesses, marketers, public service providers, community
service providers, and charities. The effectiveness and responsiveness of public policy
initiatives of federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments will be compromised.
Canada is a vast country with considerable differentiation in the economic and social
situations by geographical location. For many purposes the long-form Census questionnaire
is the only valid source of data available of a local nature.
We are all users of information derived from the Census long-form questionnaire,
and we would appreciate the opportunity to explain to you how the loss of these data would
impair our operations. For many of us this would mean a less efficient use of money we
collect from Canadians, in some cases via Government grants. For all of us, it means we
will be less sure if we are allocating our resources – be they funds or people – in an effective
way, given our respective mandates.
We appreciate that the Government is attempting to broaden the coverage with the
replacement to the long-form questionnaire. However, without similar compliance resources
and requirements, it will not be possible to achieve reasonable data results with the voluntary
form. Many problematic issues can be anticipated with such a move. The very high response
rate to the Census provides an unrivalled accuracy and allows many other key sources of
data we use from Statistics Canada to be benchmarked and to be drawn from appropriately
weighted samples.
It is of course difficult to judge in advance the sort of overall response rate that
would be realized for a voluntary survey. Tests of a move from mandatory to voluntary in
the U.S. yielded unsatisfactory results and the process was dropped. Past experience indicates
that the responses will not be representative of the total population. And in particular the
responses from key communities of concern, such as the very poor, Aboriginal communities,
recent immigrants and some ethno-racial communities, will likely be quite low. Effective
health services would be compromised. Consequently, the impact of these changes will be
disproportionately borne by those who are already most vulnerable.
.../2
-2-
Without the full Census it will be difficult to know how to adjust the responses to
correct these imbalances in response rates across socio-economic groups. It will also become
more difficult to benchmark other key data series and determine how to effectively target
other surveys with relatively smaller samples. Additionally, there will be a great loss in mon-
itoring how various groups are doing over time as there will be a serious break in the data
after 2006. This break will render all previous Census results less useful.
We understand that the far-reaching impacts of this decision may not have been
fully anticipated and we respectfully request the opportunity to help find a solution that
meets the needs of all Canadians.