Supported by
Matter
Newly Discovered Bat Viruses Give Hints to Covid’s Origins
Coronaviruses discovered in Laotian bats are surprisingly adept at infecting human cells, showing that such deadly features can indeed evolve outside of a lab.
In the summer of 2020, half a year into the coronavirus pandemic, scientists traveled into the forests of northern Laos to catch bats that might harbor close cousins of the pathogen.
In the dead of night, they used mist nets and canvas traps to snag the animals as they emerged from nearby caves, gathered samples of saliva, urine and feces, then released them back into the darkness.
The fecal samples turned out to contain coronaviruses, which the scientists studied in high security biosafety labs, known as BSL-3, using specialized protective gear and air filters.
Three of the Laos coronaviruses were unusual: They carried a molecular hook on their surface that was very similar to the hook on the virus that causes Covid-19, called SARS-CoV-2. Like SARS-CoV-2, their hook allowed them to latch onto human cells.
“It is even better than early strains of SARS-CoV-2,” said Marc Eloit, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris who led the study, referring to how well the hook on the Laos coronaviruses binds to human cells. The study was posted online last month and has not yet been published in a scientific journal.
Virus experts are buzzing about the discovery. Some suspect that these SARS-CoV-2-like viruses may already be infecting people from time to time, causing only mild and limited outbreaks. But under the right circumstances, the pathogens could give rise to a Covid-19-like pandemic, they say.
Sampling Wild Viruses
Three bats captured in northern Laos carried viruses that were remarkably similar to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. Samples from wild animals, below, may help researchers anticipate future pandemics.
CoVZXC21
CoVZC45
SARS-CoV-2
CHINA
Wuhan
Longquan140
INDIA
YUNNAN
RaTG13
PrC31
Pangolin
Guangxi
Pangolin
Guangdong
RpYN06
RmYN02
MYANMAR
LAOS
Three bat viruses genetically more similar to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13, which was previously thought to be the closest relative.
BANAL-52
BANAL-103
BANAL-236
VIRUS HOST
THAILAND
RshSTT182
RshSTT200
RacCS203
Human
CAMBODIA
Pangolin
VIETNAM
Bat
CoVZXC21
CoVZC45
VIRUS HOST
SARS-CoV-2
CHINA
Wuhan
Human
Longquan140
Pangolin
YUNNAN
Bat
RaTG13
PrC31
Pangolin
Guangxi-P4L
Pangolin
Guangdong-1
RpYN06
RmYN02
MYANMAR
LAOS
Three bat viruses genetically more similar to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13, which was previously thought to be the closest relative.
BANAL-52
BANAL-103
BANAL-236
THAILAND
RshSTT182
RshSTT200
RacCS203
CAMBODIA
VIETNAM
VIRUS HOST
CHINA
Human
SARS-CoV-2
Wuhan
Pangolin
Bat
Pangolin
Guangxi-P4L
Pangolin
Guangdong-1
YUNNAN
RaTG13
PrC31
RpYN06
RmYN02
LAOS
Three bat viruses genetically more similar to SARS-CoV-2 than RaTG13, which was previously thought to be the closest relative.
BANAL-52
BANAL-103
BANAL-236
THAILAND
RacCS203
RshSTT182
RshSTT200
CAMBODIA
VIETNAM
Advertisement