New Protein Structures Provide an Updated Understanding of Phenylketonuria

Phenylketonuria – a brief overview

Phenylalanine (Phe), one of the twenty common amino acids that are the building blocks of all protein, cannot be synthesized by humans and must be obtained through diet and/or protein catabolism. Regardless of intake, humans generally maintain blood (plasma) Phe in a narrow range, and nearly always below 120 μM. Individuals who fail to do so have disorders ranging from hyperphenylalaninemia (HPA, 120–360 μM Phe) to the most severe forms of phenylketonuria (PKU, >1200 μM Phe) (OMIM 261600). Current treatment strategies focus on lowering Phe levels, though guidelines continue to evolve (e.g. (1–5)). Untreated PKU during brain development (infancy, childhood, adolescence) can result in profound and irreversible neurocognitive damage. Poor control of Phe levels, at any life stage, can result in failures in executive function or a need for psychological or psychiatric care (6). Symptoms generally improve with reduction in blood Phe. Hence, lifelong control of blood Phe, through diet and/or pharmacological intervention, is the consensus recommendation for individuals living with HPA and PKU (hereafter together called PKU) (7).

PKU is the most common inborn error of amino acid metabolism, though frequency varies widely by country (~1:10,000 on average; 1:2,600 in Turkey; 1:100,000 in Japan). Newborn screening, early diagnosis, and a synthetic (Phe-controlled) diet during infancy and childhood has alleviated the most severe outcomes in countries where testing and intervention is available. However, neonatal testing, first introduced mid-20^th Century (8), is not yet universal; treatment is expensive and insurance coverage for medical foods remains problematic (9, 10). One outcome of successful dietary interventions is an increased population of socially integrated individuals living with PKU who are advocating for expanded non-dietary therapies. Many affected individuals struggle to obtain sufficient overall nutrition containing enough protein to satisfy essential metabolic needs while keeping Phe levels below the neurotoxic range. This problem is acute during pregnancy when high maternal Phe can cause irreversible fetal brain damage, regardless of whether the child will have PKU. Compounded by perpetual hunger, the high cost and inferior taste of most medical foods, and the basic human need for social inclusion, dietary compliance is problematic. Treatments allowing increased natural protein intake are desirable. An improved understanding of the molecular bases for PKU can help reach this goal.

The industry to address the unmet medical need of PKU includes about eight companies providing specialized foods/formulas, and one marketed therapeutic (Kuvan^®), which is effective for some patients (11). In addition, an injectable enzyme substitution therapy, Pegvaliase, is in clinical trials (12). However, a recent survey of patients indicates strong desire for new, preferably oral, interventions that will reduce the need for dietary restrictions (13). In short, there is a growing medical need, and a significant societal cost to not meeting this need. The consequences of untreated PKU has been estimated at a lifetime societal cost of >$1,000,000 per individual (12).

There is consensus that restoring the body’s ability to maintain Phe in the normal range is key to effective therapy, although it is unresolved whether the best indicator of disease is blood Phe, brain Phe, or downstream neurotransmitter concentrations (e.g. (14, 15)). Nevertheless, restoration of Phe regulation begins with understanding how unaffected individuals control Phe levels, and why there is extensive variation in phenotype among those who cannot regulate Phe. This article presents an updated framework for understanding human regulation of Phe, how this can go amiss, and ways of restoring affected individuals to a more normal Phe concentration range. The presented perspective is different from the common view; it is driven by, and focuses on, advances in knowledge of the structural biology of the enzyme phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH; EC 1.14.16.1; OMIM 612349).

Regulation of Phe in humans

Phe in humans is regulated by PAH, which functions largely in the liver, and whose dysfunction is the cause of most PKU. An understanding of normal PAH structure/function relationships provides context for repairing abnormal PAH function. Dysfunctional PAH may have one or more incapacitated characteristics of normal PAH, while the other characteristics remain intact. PAH is able to convert Phe to another common amino acid, tyrosine, using molecular oxygen, tetrahydrobiopterin (BH₄) and a non-heme iron; this chemistry occurs at the PAH active site. PAH accomplishes the regulation of Phe through a structural flexibility that allows the protein to exist as a mixture of native structures that represent “off” and “on”. In the “off” state (called resting-state PAH, (RS-PAH)), Phe cannot easily get into the active site. In the “on” state (called activated PAH (A-PAH)), the active site is fully accessible. RS-PAH and A-PAH exist as an equilibrating mixture of architecturally distinct assemblies, whose structures are used as symbols in Fig 1. At low Phe (< ~50 μM in normal individuals), the preferred PAH assembly is RS-PAH. RS-PAH is the molecular guard, watching and waiting, having a low affinity for Phe, and allowing a basal level of Phe to remain available for essential functions such as protein biosynthesis. As Phe levels rise, the PAH structural equilibrium shifts toward the activated assembly, which is A-PAH. A-PAH avidly binds Phe at the active site, converting it to tyrosine; this returns Phe levels to a concentration where RS-PAH again predominates. RS-PAH and A-PAH differ in the ability to convert Phe to tyrosine because they differ in their ability to productively bind Phe at the active site. However, the equilibrium between RS-PAH and A-PAH depends upon Phe binding to another site on the protein, called the allosteric site, which is formed by a structural change repositioning various parts of the PAH protein in the transition from RS-PAH to A-PAH. The precise structural location of this allosteric site, which Fig 1 shows as present only in the A-PAH structure, was first hypothesized in 2013 (16); it is now strongly supported by newly published structural studies (17–20). In contrast, some earlier studies had generally suggested that allosteric Phe binding involved an intermolecular interaction involving the regulatory domain; these studies were interpreted solely on the basis of an RS-PAH structure model and did not foresee the conformational change required for formation of A-PAH (e.g. (21)).

The presented Phe-centric view of PAH function stresses the regulation of Phe concentration, not the production of tyrosine. The need for tyrosine does not drive PAH activity; the availability of Phe does. To regulate Phe, PAH must be able to interconvert between the RS-PAH and A-PAH assemblies in response to fluctuations in Phe. PAH variants that cannot do this will likely be disease-associated. Thus, PAH variants defective in the ability to properly modulate the PAH structure equilibrium (Fig 1), expand our understanding of the repertoire of disease-associated PAH. The updated view of PKU does not dismiss the long-appreciated fact that a small number of disease-associated PAH variants 1) are truncated proteins that cannot fold and assemble properly or 2) are missing key active site components and cannot transform Phe to tyrosine, regardless of whether or not they fold, assemble, or convert between the RS-PAH and A-PAH structures. But the updated view departs from an oft-cited dogma that all other disease-associated PAH variants are defective in folding and/or stability. A portion of the >600 different disease-associated PAH variants have been shown to be prone to aggregation and/or degradation. These variants likely cannot properly form either the RS-PAH or the A-PAH structures. But an equally significant portion do not fall into this category. Unfortunately the concept of protein misfolding is often broadly applied in the absence of an appreciation for a metastable equilibrium of alternate protein structures, each of which is native, properly folded, and similar in energy (stability) to one another (22, 23). Here we abandon the concept of “misfolding with loss-of-function” and put a structural framework to prior proposals that disease-associated PAH variants can be defective in the allosteric response to elevated Phe in a manner that does not impair protein stability and/or promote aggregation (e.g. (21, 24)). On the basis of newly available structural information that defines the allosteric Phe binding site, we propose that there is a class of common disease-associated variants that are not defective in the ability to fold, but are defective in the ability to stabilize A-PAH. Other variants are likely defective in the ability to transition from the “off” state to the “on” state.

Structure changes required for PAH to respond to allosteric Phe binding

This section describes what is known about the structures of RS-PAH and A-PAH and how this knowledge reshapes our understanding of the breadth of PAH variants that can contribute to PKU.

PAH is encoded by a single gene (location 12q23.2), which normally yields a 452 amino-acid long protein that folds and assembles predominantly into a homotetramer (an assembly containing four copies of the same protein chain). PAH can exist as a dimer, but the factors controlling the dimer ⇔ tetramer equilibrium remain poorly understood and are not discussed herein. The PAH protein contains various structural/functional domains, which are described in Fig 2a. One or more domains are missing in two common truncation variants. The IVS12DS,G-A,+1 variant lacks the multimerization domain; the R111* variant lacks both catalytic and multimerization domains. There are also >600 disease-associated missense variants that have single amino acid changes (11, 25). These occur throughout the protein and are generally not at the enzyme active site. However, enzymatically defective active site variants include E280K, which perturbs the active site structure, and H285Y, which perturbs the iron binding site (26). In order to decipher how all the other, non-active site variants, may be impaired, one needs to know details about the structures of both RS-PAH and A-PAH. Structural understanding of full-length A-PAH remains limited to well-supported models (e.g. (16, 18, 20)), however 2016 saw publication of the first crystal structures of full-length PAH in the resting state (18, 20).

The PAH tetramer is comprised of four identical protein chains, yet the crystal structure of RS-PAH (Fig 2b, PDBid 5DEN) is asymmetric, with the largest conformational variation in the C-terminal helices (18). An independent solution structure analysis using small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) suggests an even more profound asymmetry in solution relative to the crystal structure (20). Comparison of crystal structures of RS-PAH suggests significant rocking motion in the entire resting-state structure that derives from movement of the C-terminal helices relative to each other (18). This is notable because the assembly of these helices is largely what holds the RS-PAH tetramer together. There are few other tetramer-specific inter-chain interactions. The kinetic characteristics of mammalian PAH suggest that RS-PAH may need to dissociate into dimers or monomers as part of its normal function (16, 27), but this remains hypothetical.

In contrast with positional variations seen in the C-terminal helices, the remainder of each subunit of the RS-PAH tetramer adopt the same conformation. This conformation is secured by interactions within each subunit that involve the regulatory domain contacting other parts of the subunit (18). Significant biophysical data supports the hypothesis that the regulatory domain undergoes dramatic repositioning in the transition to A-PAH (e.g. (16, 17, 19, 20, 28)). Therefore, the intrachain interactions that stabilize the RS-PAH conformation are likely forfeited in the transition to A-PAH. New intermolecular interactions, specific to A-PAH, are predicted to compensate for this loss and allow the overall stability of RS-PAH and A-PAH to be close enough that the position of the equilibrium can be shifted by ligand binding (or single amino acid substitutions). The key perturbing ligands will be those that have interactions specific to either RS-PAH or A-PAH, rather than those that bind to a site that is common to both structures.

Development of a model of A-PAH (Fig 2c) (16), began with the realization that PAH may not be an exception to the rule that ACT domains in proteins generally form homodimers (29, 30). The PAH ACT domain is a major component of the PAH regulatory domain (see Fig 2a). The Protein Data Bank (PDB) contains many protein structures that show ACT domain dimers to have amino acid ligands at the dimer interface. There are now examples in the PDB where ACT domain dimerization is stabilized by allosteric amino acid ligand binding and this serves as a structural foundation for gating active site access and regulating metabolism (31). In the RS-PAH tetramer (Fig 2b), where the ACT domains are not interacting with each other, the N-terminal portion of the regulatory domain (i.e. the autoregulatory region) impedes active site access; non-interacting ACT domains correspond to the autoinhibited conformation of PAH. An approximate 90° rotation of the regulatory domains relative to the catalytic domains of PAH was proposed to form the allosteric Phe binding site at the ACT domain dimer interface (16): this domain rotation (illustrated in Fig 2d) would drag along the autoregulatory region and remove (disallow) active site occlusion. Thus, for PAH, interacting ACT domains correspond to the activated conformation. With the understanding that all protein structures can sample a variety of conformations, in the current usage, RS-PAH refers to all conformations containing monomeric ACT domains while A-PAH refers to all conformations containing the ACT domain dimer. Although our prediction of the specific location of allosteric Phe binding at an ACT dimer interface was novel in 2013, it was preceded by biophysical studies that suggested that isolated PAH regulatory domain dimerization occurs in the absence of Phe and that Phe binding to the dimer causes a conformational change (32); earlier non-structural studies investigating the roles of PAH residues 46–48 and 65–69 in Phe binding to a PAH regulatory domain dimer (21). Several 2016 publications support the hypothetical location of Phe bound to A-PAH. These are: 1) an NMR study that positions the allosteric Phe ligand as bound to residues predicted to be at the PAH ACT-dimer interface (17), 2) two independent SAXS studies consistent with formation of the PAH ACT-domain dimer in the presence of Phe (18, 20), and 3) the X-ray crystal structure of a truncated PAH ACT domain (Fig 3a), assembled as a dimer, with Phe bound as predicted in the 2013 model (16, 19). The crystal structure (PDB id 5FII) precisely defines the amino acids that interact with allosterically bound Phe.

The full-length A-PAH structure model (Fig 2c) remains an approximation. Overwhelming evidence supports Phe-responsive regulatory domain dimerization as the mechanism for allosteric control of PAH activity by Phe (17–20), but many structural details about A-PAH remain unknown. It remains unknown whether A-PAH has a distinct conformation for the C-terminal helices among monomers. Evidence for alternate conformations for the helices was originally suggested by the crystal structure of a truncated human PAH tetramer that lacked the regulatory domain (PDB id 2PAH) (33). The fold and/or location of the autoregulatory region in A-PAH is also unknown. In keeping with published biophysical studies (34), a compact conformation for the autoregulatory region is modeled with possible stabilizing interactions involving both the regulatory and catalytic domains (Fig 2c). Regardless of the details of the A-PAH structure, ACT domain dimerization dictates that stabilizing interactions in RS-PAH that involve the regulatory domain will be forfeited upon formation of A-PAH. The stabilizing interactions specific to A-PAH, which are predicted to compensate for these losses, are 1) at the ACT domain dimer interface, 2) interactions between the dimerized ACT domain and the catalytic and/or multimerization domains, and 3) yet unidentified interactions involving the repositioned/refolded autoregulatory region. Based on the structure of RS-PAH and the model of A-PAH, we predict that there will be an equilibrium between the two structures that do not significantly differ in intrinsic stability (see Fig 1). Phe can bind allosterically only to A-PAH, and allosteric Phe binding is predicted to stabilize the ACT-domain dimer interface. Thus, in the presence of Phe, A-PAH will be selectively stabilized and the equilibrium of PAH structures will be shifted towards the activated tetramer. This provides a structural foundation to the conformational selection model for PAH allostery (e.g. (35)), as distinct from an induced fit model, which requires an allosteric Phe binding site on RS-PAH. Despite computational studies assuming such a site (e.g. (36, 37)), it does not appear to exist (20). The apparent absence of allosteric Phe binding to the RS-PAH structure illustrated in Fig 2b constitutes a paradigm shift in understanding PAH structure/function relationships. This paradigm shift is away form an induced fit allosteric mechanism toward a conformational selection allosteric mechanism.

The PAH structure equilibrium and small molecule stabilization

Much prior and ongoing research on disease-associated PAH function has focused on protein stability (e.g. (38–43)). Unfortunately, such work has often used the terms “misfolded” or “misfolding” (in place of stability) when there is no measure of the folding process nor the final folded state. Within the context of an equilibrium of alternately assembled multimers, Fig 4 presents an updated view of PAH structure dynamics introducing an expanded context to analyze and understand normal PAH function and dysfunction within the context of small molecules that can alter the position of the equilibrium of PAH structures. Considering PKU in terms of the existence of an equilibrium of alternatively folded and/or assembled native structures is an important refinement to the imprecise generalization that “PAH misfolding” is a the most common basis for PKU. Some PKU-associated PAH variants exemplify a disequilibrium among functionally distinct native structures.

Figure 4 shows newly synthesized PAH protein as folding and assembling into the equilibrium of native structures (RS-PAH and A-PAH tetramers). This process is in competition with protein misfolding/degradation. Any entity that stabilizes one or more of the native structures may help draw newly synthesized wild-type PAH or disease-associated PAH variants into the physiologically relevant equilibrium of native assemblies. The co-substrate BH₄ can stabilize RS-PAH (as illustrated in Fig 5), shift the equilibrium in that direction, and act as an inhibitor (see below). Elevated Phe can bind allosterically to stabilize A-PAH (see Fig 2c, 3a), shift the equilibrium in that direction, and act as an activator. This is consistent with the well-established phenomenon that exposing PAH to BH₄ causes inhibition of in vitro enzyme activity, while exposing PAH to Phe (> ~100 μM) causes activation (e.g. (44)). Inhibitory BH₄ binding and activating Phe binding are both multimer-specific, each stabilizing their respective multimer, and helping to draw newly synthesized (or partially folded) PAH into the equilibrium of native structures. Inhibitory BH₄ binding is specific for RS-PAH because this binding site includes hydrogen bonding to Ser23, an auto-inhibitory interaction that is disallowed in A-PAH (Fig 2b, Fig 5). Allosteric Phe binding is specific for A-PAH because the binding site is at the ACT domain dimer interface (Fig 2c, 3a), which is only present in the A-PAH structure. Furthermore, BH₄ and Phe compete with each other to control the position of the equilibrium (Fig 4). This correlates with the observation that some individuals living with PKU are found to achieve lower Phe levels when treated with a lesser dose of BH₄ (45). The equilibrium presented in Fig 4 also suggests that it may be possible to design or discover a pharmacological chaperone that will specifically bind to and stabilize A-PAH regardless of whether or not Phe is bound in the allosteric site. Unlike chaperones, which assist in protein folding, pharmacological chaperones are small molecules that stabilize a folded protein structure by binding to a specific ligand binding site (46). In order to sensitize the protein’s response to allosteric activation by Phe, the desired pharmacological chaperone will stabilize A-PAH by binding to a multimer-specific site that is different from the allosteric Phe binding site. This is distinct from an effector that binds to the allosteric site and activates PAH regardless of the Phe level. The latter runs the risk of constitutive activation (like enzyme replacement therapy), which can deplete Phe levels below those required for normal cellular functions. There have been a variety of approaches to identifying new pharmacological chaperones for PAH, most of which target the enzyme active site (47–50); it is not yet established if these agents selectively bind to and stabilize either RS-PAH or A-PAH.

BH₄ acting as a pharmacological chaperone

BH₄ acting as a pharmacological chaperone was discovered in the process of discriminating between PKU caused by PAH dysfunction and PKU caused by rare defects in BH₄ biosynthesis (51). Newly diagnosed patients, challenged by administration of BH₄, were monitored for reduction in blood Phe as a diagnostic for defects in BH₄ biosynthesis. However, decreased Phe levels in response to BH₄ were also observed in a subset of patients whose PKU was caused by PAH dysfunction. In these cases, BH₄ appeared to be working as a pharmacological chaperone to restore dysfunctional PAH to more normal function (52). Kuvan^®, marketed by BioMarin Pharmaceuticals in the USA, is the name of the pharmacological form of BH₄; it is reported as effective in lowering Phe levels for ~30% of PKU affected individuals for whom it has been tried (53). Much research has been directed at determining which genotypes are likely to respond to BH₄, with varying results (e.g. (11, 39, 52, 54–58)).

Figure 5a illustrates the molecular basis for BH₄ inhibition through stabilization of RS-PAH, as previously deduced from structures of truncated PAH (59–61). Shown is an overlay of the crystal structures of full length PAH and the isolated PAH catalytic domain bound to BH₄. Figure 5b illustrates a similar overlay using a catalytic domain structure that also has norleucine (a Phe analog) at the enzyme active site. In the absence of a Phe analog, BH₄ is positioned to form two hydrogen bonds to Ser23, securing the auto-inhibitory interaction (Fig 5a). Kinetic evidence for the importance of this molecular interaction to BH₄ inhibition comes from stereospecificity for the 6R (not the 6S) isomer of BH₄, and lack of inhibition by 6-methyltetrahydropterin (6MPH₄), a BH₄ analog that lacks the corresponding hydroxyl group (44); each of these pterins supports tyrosine formation. Figure 5b shows that, in the presence of norleucine, BH₄ moves deeper into the active site and is no longer positioned to H-bond with the auto-regulatory region (stabilize the RS-PAH structure). This structural basis for loss of autoinhibition when Phe itself is bound at the active site was previously described (62). Thus, BH₄ serves as a pharmacological chaperone by binding near the edge of the active site and securing the auto-inhibitory interaction through a reversible interaction that impedes active site access. Molecular motions available to RS-PAH include a hinge at the boundary between the autoregulatory region and the ACT domain (see Fig 2a); motion at this hinge likely accounts for the transient nature of auto-inhibition. It is important to note that there are conformational variants of RS-PAH in which autoinhibition is more or less transient. For example, PAH phosphorylation at Ser-16 appears to destabilize the autoinhibited conformation of RS-PAH without rotating the entire regulatory domain, as would be necessary to form A-PAH (63, 64).

The vast array of disease-associated PAH variants

Normal PAH function, seen as the regulation of Phe, requires accommodation of two architecturally distinct tetramer structures (RS-PAH and A-PAH) as well as the transient molecular interactions that may be required to transition between these structures. Although normal PAH can adroitly accomplish these reversible structural changes and maintain Phe in a healthy concentration range, the PAH of many individuals living with PKU cannot. This failure of normal function may result from the disease-associated amino acid change stabilizing RS-PAH, destabilizing A-PAH, or destabilizing a transient structure that PAH must sample in order to transition from RS-PAH to the A-PAH structure. In each of these cases, higher Phe levels would be required to shift the equilibrium toward A-PAH. With this in mind, it is perhaps not all that surprising that there are myriad disease-associated PAH missense mutations and these occur throughout the entire protein.

Any of the >600 amino acid substitution that may stabilize (or destabilize) one or more of the folded/assembled structures has the potential to contribute to disease by shifting the tipping-point for the equilibrium shown in Fig 1. Identifying these is the subject of ongoing investigation. However, based on the available crystal structures, two of the more common disease-associated alleles encode missense PAH variants, L48S and I65T, which are predicted to perturb intermolecular interactions important to the stability of A-PAH. Leu48 and Ile65 contribute to the hydrophobic core of the ACT domain dimer (see Fig 3b) and both make van der Waals contact with the allosteric Phe in the crystal structure of the Phe-bound ACT domain (19). Consistent with this prediction, the I65T variant has been reported to abolish Phe binding to the PAH regulatory domain (21). In contrast, kinetic analysis using a tetrameric fusion protein shows the I65T variant to have a relatively normal affinity for Phe (39), though the activity suggests that the fusion itself favors release of autoinhibition. Although sophisticated kinetic analysis are reported for L48S (e.g. (45)), direct Phe binding to the regulatory domain has not. Unfortunately published kinetic analysis on many disease associated PAH variants use intact fusion proteins and/or determine the allosteric response only at 1 mM Phe. These data do not address more subtle changes that would become apparent at lower Phe concentrations (e.g. 100 – 200 μM). It is also interesting that patients expressing the L48S and/or I65T variants are reported as having highly variable responses to BH₄ therapy (54, 58, 65).

Further contribution to heterogeneity in genotype/phenotype correlation stems from the fact that most patients are compound heterozygotes whose genes encode two different disease-associated PAH proteins. In many instances, these patients will have PAH tetramers that are heteromeric, though not necessarily in a 50:50 mixture. There are in vitro studies supporting interallelic complementation in which one gene product dominates the phenotype (56, 65–67).

The precedent for the updated view of PAH and PKU is porphobilinogen synthase and the inborn error ALAD porphyria

Perturbation of a highly responsive equilibrium between two architecturally distinct protein multimers has been established as the molecular basis for ALAD porphyria, a very rare inborn error of metabolism caused by dysfunction of the enzyme porphobilinogen synthase (68). In this disease, the position of a multimeric equilibrium is altered in each of the eight disease-associated missense variants (69). Similar to PAH variants, the amino acid substitutions associated with ALAD porphyria occur throughout the protein. In vitro screening established that a few dozen compounds, some of which are drugs (70) and some of which are environmental contaminants (71), inhibit this protein by shifting the multimeric equilibrium toward the low-activity multimer. One might expect that the sensitive equilibrium proposed for PAH could also respond to small molecules, such as drugs and environmental contaminants, for which individual exposure would vary considerably, providing an environmental contribution to variations in genotype/phenotype correlations.

CONCLUSION

PKU is a complex disease usually caused by PAH dysfunction. PAH is described in terms of a sensitive equilibrium between RS-PAH and A-PAH structures, for which there is new structural information (17–20). The position of this equilibrium is governed by available Phe, which selectively binds to and stabilizes A-PAH. The equilibrium position will also respond to anything that perturbs the intrinsic stability of either structure (e.g. single amino acid variants of PAH, molecules that selectively bind to either RS-PAH or A-PAH, such as drugs, foods, environmental contaminants, or metabolic byproducts). BH₄ acts as an effective pharmacological chaperone for some disease-associated PAH by selectively binding to and stabilizing RS-PAH. This helps draw newly synthesized PAH into the equilibrium of native structures, but requires higher Phe to shift the equilibrium toward A-PAH. The envisaged pharmacological chaperone would bind to A-PAH in a manner that does not interfere with allosteric Phe binding. Although significant new structural data helps define this updated view of PKU, an important remaining “unknown” is the detailed structure of A-PAH.