Economists are rethinking the numbers on inequality
An academic disagreement has big real-world implications
OVER A DECADE before thousands of protesters gathered in Zuccotti Park in New York in 2011, a little-known researcher in France sat down to write about income inequality in a new way. “The focus of our study consists in comparing the evolution of the incomes of the top 10%, the top 1%, the top 0.5%, and so on,” Thomas Piketty wrote in a paper in 1998. With his long-term co-author, Emmanuel Saez, Mr Piketty pioneered the use of tax data over survey data, thereby doing a better job of capturing the incomes of the richest. He revealed that “the 1%” had made out like bandits at the expense of “the 99%”. His research gave Occupy Wall Street its vocabulary.
This article appeared in the Briefing section of the print edition under the headline “Measuring the 1%”
Discover more
Elon Musk’s transformation, in his own words
Our analysis of 38,000 posts on X reveal a changed man
Elon Musk and Donald Trump seem besotted. Where is their bromance headed?
The precedents are not encouraging
The energy transition will be much cheaper than you think
Most analysts overestimate energy demand and underestimate technological advances
Donald Trump’s victory was resounding. His second term will be, too
Congress is not likely to be much of a constraint on him
How bad could a second Trump presidency get?
The damage to America’s economy, institutions and the world would be huge
GLP-1s like Ozempic are among the most important drug breakthroughs ever
Their far-reaching potential could transform how chronic diseases are managed