Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2009, Gabor Agoston and Bruce Masters, eds., Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire (New York: Facts on File)
…
3 pages
1 file
Latin Catholicism in Ottoman Istanbul, eds. Vanessa R. de Obaldía and Claudio Monge: 63-84. Istanbul: Isis Press, 2022, 2022
After the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in 1453, many Genoese continued to reside in Pera-Galata, often becoming Ottoman subjects; but some Genoese sought to reestablish their rule of this city just across the Golden Horn from Constantinople. In this book chapter, I argue that, by the 1460s and 1470s, the Genoese presence in Ottoman lands was much by a cascade of departures. To demonstrate this argument, I focus on the timing and extent of the repatriation of holy relics from the churches of Pera-Galata back to Genoa – and also on Ottoman records, particularly the 1455 survey for Istanbul and Galata, which offer an essential corrective to studies based only on western sources
Urban Façade: Istanbul Waterfront, Özyeğin University, Istanbul, 23-30.03.2019, 2019
Galata was subjected to numerous research and mapping attempts concerning its built heritage. However, some particular urban and architectural objectives have continued to remain rather vague, which could be first listed as precise borders of the territorial concessions given in May 1303, March 1304, 1316, May 1352 and August 1376. Secondly, construction phases of Galata Walls were usually generalized after striking epigraphic evidence. Correspondingly, the mysterious "tower houses" in relation with nearby walls and exact positions of some disappeared churches provide significant traces about the spatial evolution of this neighborhood. Other than some forgotten remnants, even to what extent some most well known monuments have parts from the Genoese period or not was not displayed in detail most of the time. In fact, those issues were partially clarified and compiled but existing primary sources are still yet to be considered together, above all with the addition of the city itself.
In-Scription: revue en ligne d'études épigraphiques 3 (Online), 2021
The Galata Tower has been witness to many historical events and has gone through multiple architectural phases over the course of its long life. Its Genoese origins began to receive scholarly attention particularly in the late eighteenth century and especially during the nineteenth century. In the meantime, a consensus was reached about the history and architecture of the tower’s Genoese period. However, this consensus was based on a few primary sources without any comprehensive approaches nor in-depth investigation. The tower’s erroneous name, “Tower of Christ” (Christea Turris), during its Genoese period is perhaps the most widespread assumption in the secondary literature. A first construction by Anastasios I and a heightening around 1445/1446 are further related misconceptions that all three arguments were derived from a single, though irrelevant inscription. Despite the popularity of Galata as a research topic, these misconceptions have become anonymous and continuously repeated without being questioned. Moreover, slightly different arguments for the tower were put forward. When compared to later periods of the monument, the former name of the tower, its alleged Byzantine past, and especially the Genoese architectural identity of the present structure remain rather ambiguous in the light of all the arguments in the literature. For these reasons, this article presents a fundamental reevaluation for the Genoese period of the Galata Tower through virtually all of the primary sources and a small architectural survey. This article shows that there is no solid evidence of the supposed Byzantine period of the tower; that it was named as the “Tower of the Holy Cross” (Turris Sancte Crucis) by the Genoese who built it, and its first structural alteration was probably executed by the Ottomans around 1453. Published online: https://in-scription.edel.univ-poitiers.fr/in-scription/index.php?id=480 Note: This article is essentially a translation from Turkish to English with some minor corrections and additions. For the original publication, see: Hasan Sercan Sağlam, “Galata Kulesi’nin Ceneviz Dönemine Yönelik Bir Yeniden Değerlendirme”, YILLIK: Annual of Istanbul Studies 2 (2020): 53-80.
Online International Conference, On Byzantine, Western and Post- Byzantine Towers (10th-16th centuries), 18-20.11.2022, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, 2022
The Genoese possessed the Galata region of Constantinople during the Late Byzantine Period and founded a thriving colony called Pera there. This colonial rule between 1267-1453, also enabled the Genoese to fortify the region through a series of defensive works that included numerous towers, in which the Galata Tower (Turris Sancte Crucis) was undoubtedly the most renowned one amongst others. It can be argued that a superficial consideration would interpret the Galata Tower simply as a watchtower or a symbolic monument, while the walls as a basic line of defense along the perimeter of the colony. However, they actually served as key defensive elements of Pera and were strategically important, though were not scientifically handled in this context yet. Thus, with the help of an interdisciplinary methodology through various primary sources and the literature, this paper aims to elaborate the tactical purpose of the tower and the adjacent wall courses against potential land sieges to the Pera colony.
A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture. Istanbul, 17 (2): 15-29, 2020
Today a long lost monument; San Michele Church, which stood once as the cathedral church of the Genoese colony, has a significant place in the history of Galata. It was founded replacing the Byzantine church of Hagia Thekla as Galata transformed into a Genoese settlement in 13th century. Serving as a church, it was still intact when Galata went under Ottoman rule. It has lost its congregation and started to serve as a storage unit as part of state property. It must have survived for a hundred more years under the Ottoman rule until its ownership changed to private property, and eventually it was replaced by a monumental caravanserai for the grand vizier Rüstem Pasha, designed by Architect Sinan in mid 16th century, later named Kurşunlu Han. The first parts of this study focus on the Genoese and Ottoman archival documents referring to the church, to draw an outline of the history of the church, and the site, through Byzantine, Genoese and Ottoman periods. The second part presents the on-site observations and aims to merge these with the data acquired from historic documents questioning any possible traces on the 16th century Ottoman monument that may date back to the church. This study aims to bring to light the above mentioned chronology of the church, portray as much as possible its architecture, its functional transformations, its afterlife under Ottoman rule and physical evidence that might be tracing back to San Michele Church within the body of Kurşunlu Han, which replaced it.
The Dialectics of Urban and Architectural Boundaries in the Middle East and Mediterranean, 2021
The Genoese walled town of Galata was positioned on the Golden Horn opposite Byzantium. Beyond the furthest northern point of its walls and the tower fields and rural areas lied. Later on this site that lied beyond the Genoese settlement the most cosmopolitan part of Ottoman Istanbul will develop. Life in Galata was condensed due to maritime trade and harbor’s activities. The settlement couldn’t absorb the influx of incoming population due to increased trades. As a result, its borders were pushed and extended outside its walls toward the rural area of the hill and its ridge above, later known as Beyoğlu and Pera. These rural, agricultural areas with cemeteries and groves on the north side of Galata will transform into an area marked with diplomatic representative’s residences and palaces. Here the new cosmopolitan city following Western European models will be established. The rural fields of the past will be replaced with new structures that will later change the entire area into a new cosmopolitan core of modern Istanbul baring the name of Pera. Galata and its walled frontier will slowly disappear and will transition from Galata toward Pera known as Beyoğlu, center of new emerging cosmopolitan bourgeoisie of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
YILLIK. Annual of Istanbul Studies, 2023
While a number of fortifications have been attributed to the Genoese in Anatolia, the Walls of Galata are the only fortifications built entirely by them. Although the term "Genoese castle" is commonly used for most of these fortresses, even those without any trace of Genoese history, what is meant by "Genoese" architecture has not yet been fully identified or defined. This article investigates medieval building techniques and masonry traditions that the Genoese might have employed in their architectural practice. For this purpose, a comprehensive inventory of the surviving parts of the Walls of Galata to date has been created, and the building techniques of the surviving sections are investigated in detail. These techniques are analyzed through a comparison of other buildings in Galata and Genoa built by the Genoese and the Palaiologan buildings in Constantinople/Istanbul. Next, other "Genoese" fortresses in Anatolia and eastern Thrace and their building techniques and materials are similarly evaluated in the late Byzantine context. This research reveals that the Genoese essentially (re)used available building materials, adopting the building techniques and masonry traditions of the Palaiologan architecture in association with a collaboration with Byzantine masons. It concludes that the Genoese most likely introduced the use of pointed arches to Byzantine masons in Constantinople, and that the Walls of Galata are one of the earliest monuments in Istanbul where pointed arches were used.
Araştirma Sonuçlari Toplantisi 28/1, 2010
Academia Green Energy, 2024
Academia Letters, 2021
Medievalisms in a Global Age, 2024
Inscribed poetry in 16th century Safavid carpets, 2019
Opus Mixtum 10, с. 49-74., 2022
The Journal of Architecture, 2024
Acercamientos meteorológicos a la subjetivación política: debates latinoamericanos., 2013
Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 2024
AGRI-SOSIOEKONOMI, 2018
Parasites & Vectors
Southeastern Naturalist, 2004
Metamorfosa: Journal of Bilogical Sciences, 2022
Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2018
Engenharia Agrícola, 2009