The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls.
At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer.
View the web archive through the Wayback Machine.
Web wide crawl with initial seedlist and crawler configuration from September 2012.
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20121014121719/http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html
You Might Be An Anti-Spam Kook If...
Each item in the following list was suggested by the words or actions
of people who presented themselves to the IETF or elsewhere as
having discovered the FUSSP.
Some of the items may seem obscure to those who have not dealt with the IETF.
Almost all of those who have inspired this list mean well.
In many cases, they are not in the habit of thinking
critically and believe that "Star Trek" accurately depicts the creation
of hardware, software, and even social or political mechanisms.
You started looking for the FUSSP after observing that it is
impossible to filter more than 99% of spam with fewer than 0.1%
false positives by currently available mechanisms.
Despite being the inventor of the FUSSP, you are unfamiliar with
false positive, false negative, UBE, tarpit, teergrube,
Brightmail, Postini, SpamAssassin, DNS blacklist, HELO,
RBL, or mail envelope.
You invented the FUSSP but thieves stole the idea.
Never mind that the so called thieves talked about your idea in
public and used it long before you first thought of it.
You have no solutions for the problems in the FUSSP and your
implementation and deployment plan is tell to Google, but you do know that
Arthur C. Clarke wrote "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states
that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states
that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
Despite having invented the FUSSP, you not only don't know
the difference between the SMTP envelope and SMTP headers.
You doubt there is such a thing as the SMTP envelope because email
doesn't involve paper.
Despite having invented the FUSSP, your SMTP header and DSN
reading skills are such that when you send a mail
message to two sites and one rejects it,
you can't tell that only one rejected it, not to mention which one.
Spammers can't use automation or cheap labor for puzzle solving,
character recognition,
or other hoops that the FUSSP requires of legitimate mail senders.
With standards, the implementation cost is about zero, so the FUSSP will
be practically universally deployed within months of being documented in
an RFC.
You know that the failure of SMTP servers to authenticate the SMTP
clients of strangers is a major bug in SMTP instead of an expression
of a primary design goal.
The FUSSP requires a small number of central servers on the Internet
to handle certificates, act as pull servers for bulk mail, account
for mail charges, or whatever, and that is good thing or not a problem
The FUSSP uses central servers to manage all mailing list
subscriptions on the Internet, handle digital signatures for mail,
and track spam. Your impression that Google has 100% uptime shows that
this problem can be solved by using a bunch of Linux systems.
The central servers required by the FUSSP to handle all mailing
list subscriptions, digital signatures for mail and so forth will
be run by a non-profit organization. It will be easy to find or
create a non-profit organization that everyone will trust.
The FUSSP involves ISPs issuing certificates to users and
the ISPs that today don't terminate the accounts of spammers and don't
investigate prospective customers enough to refuse service
to spammers today will refuse FUSSP certificates to known spammers
and revoke the certificates of new spammers.
You frequently use terms from math, statistics, and information
theory, but have never heard of The Law of Large Numbers and
think entropy is something about heat.
