iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1145/3083165.3083177
Candid with YouTube | Proceedings of the 27th Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video skip to main content
10.1145/3083165.3083177acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Candid with YouTube: Adaptive Streaming Behavior and Implications on Data Consumption

Published: 20 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

YouTube has emerged as the largest player among video streaming services, serving video content for users using DASH. Research studies on various aspects of YouTube, especially its streaming service, abound in the literature. However, these works study YouTube streaming from the periphery, and report results based on their understanding of general DASH recommendations. In this study, we explore in depth YouTube's implementation of the DASH client. We identify important parameters in YouTube's rate adaptation algorithm, and study their roles. In a departure from existing literature, we observe that YouTube opportunistically adapts segment length, in addition to quality level, in response to bandwidth fluctuations. We report that this scheme results in a much lower average data wastage ratio (0.82x10-6), than reported earlier. We also propose an analytical model, augmented with a machine learning based classifier (with average accuracy of 85.75%), to predict data consumption for a playback session in advance.

References

[1]
2016. Format and Resolution of YouTube Videos (last accessed: July 2016). (2016). http://www.genyoutube.net/formats-resolution-youtube-videos.html
[2]
Leo Breiman. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45, 1 (2001), 5--32.
[3]
X. Che, B. Ip, and L. Lin. 2015. A Survey of Current YouTube Video Characteristics. IEEE Multimedia 22, 2 (Apr 2015), 56--63.
[4]
Alessandro Finamore, Marco Mellia, Maurizio M Munafò, Ruben Torres, and Sanjay G Rao. 2011. YouTube everywhere: Impact of device and infrastructure synergies on user experience. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM IMC. 345--360.
[5]
Phillipa Gill, Martin Arlitt, Zongpeng Li, and Anirban Mahanti. 2007. Youtube traffic characterization: a view from the edge. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM IMC. 15--28.
[6]
Dilip Kumar Krishnappa, Divyashri Bhat, and Michael Zink. 2013. DASHing YouTube: An analysis of using DASH in YouTube video service. In Proceedings of IEEE 38th LCN. 407--415.
[7]
J. J. Ramos-munoz, J. Prados-Garzon, P. Ameigeiras, J. Navarro-Ortiz, and J. M. Lopez-soler. 2014. Characteristics of mobile youtube traffic. IEEE Wireless Communications 21, 1 (February 2014), 18--25.
[8]
Michael Seufert, Florian Wamser, Pedro Casas, Ralf Irmer, Phuoc Tran-Gia, and Raimund Schatz. 2015. YouTube QoE on mobile devices: Subjective analysis of classical vs. adaptive video streaming. In Proceedings of IEEE IWCMC. 43--48.
[9]
Christian Sieber, Andreas Blenk, Max Hinteregger, and Wolfgang Kellerer. 2015. The cost of aggressive HTTP adaptive streaming: Quantifying YouTube's redundant traffic. In Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE IM. 1261--1267.
[10]
Christian Sieber, Poul Heegaard, Tobias Hoßfeld, and Wolfgang Kellerer. 2016. Sacrificing efficiency for quality of experience: YouTube's redundant traffic behavior. In Proceedings of IFIP Networking. 503--511.
[11]
Florian Wamser, Pedro Casas, Michael Seufert, Christian Moldovan, Phuoc Tran-Gia, and Tobias Hossfeld. 2016. Modeling the YouTube stack: From packets to quality of experience. Computer Networks (2016).
[12]
Florian Wamser, Michael Seufert, Pedro Casas, Ralf Irmer, Phuoc Tran-Gia, and Raimund Schatz. 2015. Poster: Understanding YouTube QoE in Cellular Networks with YoMoApp: A QoE Monitoring Tool for YouTube Mobile. In Proceedings of the 21st MobiCom. 263--265.
[13]
Ian H. Witten, Eibe Frank, Mark A. Hall, and Christopher J. Pal. 2016. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (4 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA.
[14]
Xuan Kelvin Zou, Jeffrey Erman, Vijay Gopalakrishnan, Emir Halepovic, Rittwik Jana, Xin Jin, Jennifer Rexford, and Rakesh K Sinha. 2015. Can accurate predictions improve video streaming in cellular networks?. In Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM, 57--62.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Characterizing User Platforms for Video Streaming in Broadband NetworksProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3688435(563-579)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Managing Connections by QUIC-TCP Racing: A First Look of Streaming Media Performance Over Popular HTTP/3 BrowsersIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2024.337106921:3(2962-2976)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2024)Watching Stars in Pixels: The Interplay Of Traffic Shaping and YouTube Streaming QoE over GEO Satellite NetworksPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_8(153-169)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
NOSSDAV'17: Proceedings of the 27th Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video
June 2017
105 pages
ISBN:9781450350037
DOI:10.1145/3083165
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 20 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MMSys'17
Sponsor:
MMSys'17: Multimedia Systems Conference 2017
June 20 - 23, 2017
Taipei, Taiwan

Acceptance Rates

NOSSDAV'17 Paper Acceptance Rate 15 of 40 submissions, 38%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 363 submissions, 33%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Characterizing User Platforms for Video Streaming in Broadband NetworksProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3688435(563-579)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Managing Connections by QUIC-TCP Racing: A First Look of Streaming Media Performance Over Popular HTTP/3 BrowsersIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2024.337106921:3(2962-2976)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2024)Watching Stars in Pixels: The Interplay Of Traffic Shaping and YouTube Streaming QoE over GEO Satellite NetworksPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-031-56252-5_8(153-169)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Buffer Awareness Neural Adaptive Video Streaming for Avoiding Extra Buffer ConsumptionIEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10229002(1-10)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
  • (2023)RDladder: Resolution-Duration Ladder for VBR-encoded Videos via Imitation LearningIEEE INFOCOM 2023 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications10.1109/INFOCOM53939.2023.10228995(1-10)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
  • (2023)Performance Evaluation of Video Streaming Applications with Target Wake Time in Wi-Fi 62023 15th International Conference on COMmunication Systems & NETworkS (COMSNETS)10.1109/COMSNETS56262.2023.10041325(802-807)Online publication date: 3-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Traffic Spills the Beans: A Robust Video Identification Attack Against YouTubeComputers & Security10.1016/j.cose.2023.103623(103623)Online publication date: Nov-2023
  • (2022)Network Capacity Estimators Predicting QoE in HTTP Adaptive StreamingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.314518510(9817-9829)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2022)Defeating traffic analysis via differential privacy: a case study on streaming trafficInternational Journal of Information Security10.1007/s10207-021-00574-321:3(689-706)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2022
  • (2021)The Upstream Matters: Impact of Uplink Performance on YouTube 360° Live Video Streaming in LTEIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31102849(123245-123259)Online publication date: 2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media