iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/S11432-010-4140-4
Optimality strategy of a sealed-offer simultaneous bargaining protocol | Science China Information Sciences Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Optimality strategy of a sealed-offer simultaneous bargaining protocol

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternating-offer bargaining protocol is the most predominant way for solving bilateral bargaining problem. However, alternating-offer may consume much time and cause a low efficiency in some cases. Especially, a deadlock in which both negotiators are unwilling to concede or refuse to disclose more information may arise. Then mediation is required. This paper presents an agent-based sealed-offer simultaneous bargaining protocol by introducing a nonbiased mediator. The information of both agents is considered completely private. In our agent-based model, both agents simultaneously submit their respective offers to the mediate agent. The offers of each agent are not revealed to the opponent. This design can discourage counter-speculation and effectively control fraud and misrepresentation in a certain extent. Further, we analyze how an agent can exploit the available information in selecting a strategy that maximizes its expected utility and give the optimal offers of each agent at each stage of the negotiation. Four groups of automated experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed automated negotiation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 1982, 50: 97–109

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatterjee K, Lee C C. Bargaining and search with incomplete information about outside options. Game Econ Behav, 1998, 22: 203–237

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Fudenberg D, Tirole J. Sequential bargaining under incomplete information. Rev Econ Stud, 1983, 50: 221–248

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Muthoo A. On the strategic role of outside options in bilateral bargaining. Oper Res, 1995, 43: 292–297

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver J R. A machine-learning approach to automated negotiation and prospects for electronic commerce. J Manag Inf Syst, 1997, 13: 83–112

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ordover J A, Rubinstein A. A sequential concession game with asymmetric information. The Quart J Econ, 1986, 101: 879–888

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubinstein A. A bargaining model under incomplete information. Econometrica, 1985, 53: 1151–1172

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Lomuscio A, Wooldridge M, Jennings N R. A classification scheme for negotiation in electronic commerce. Int J Group Decis Negot, 2003, 12: 31–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo X, Jennings N R, Shadbolt N, et al. A fuzzy constraint based model for bilateral multi-issue negotiations in semi-competitive environments. Artifl Intell, 2003, 148: 53–102

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen D N, Jeng B, Lee W P, et al. An agent-based model for consumer-to-business electronic commerce. Expert Syst Appl, 2008, 34: 469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Faratin P, Sierra C, Jennings N R. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robot Autonom Syst, 1998, 24: 159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fatima S S, Wooldridge M, Jennings N R. Optimal negotiation strategies for agents with incomplete information. In: Meyer J J, Tambe M, eds. Intelligent Agents VIII, Agent Theories, Architectures and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer, 2002, 2333: 377–392

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J G, Zionts S. Negotiating wisely: considerations based on MCDM/MAUT. Europ J Oper Res, 2008, 188: 191–205

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang L L, Chen X G. An agent-based multi-attribute sealed-bid design for bilateral contract. J Softw, 2009, 4: 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Y M, Huang P N. Agent-based bilateral multi-issue negotiation scheme for e-market transactions. Appl Soft Comput J, 2009, 9: 1057–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kebriaei H, Majd V J. A simultaneous multi-attribute soft-bargaining design for bilateral contracts. Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36: 4417–4422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li J, Jing B, Yang Y X. A genetic algorithm based on metropolis rule and its application in multi-lateral multi-issue negotiation. Tien Tzu Hsueh Pao/Acta Electron Sin, 2009, 37: 1037–1040

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hemaissia M, EI Fallah Seghrouchni A, Labreuche C, et al. A multilateral multi-issue negotiation protocol. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Honolulu, HI: Association for Computing Machinery, 2007. 943–950

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sloof R. Finite horizon bargaining with outside options and threat points. Theory Decis, 2004, 57: 109–142

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Song H G. Research on a novel bargaining protocol for open e-marketplaces (in Chinese). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  21. Copic J, Ponsati C. Robust bilateral trade and mediated bargaining. J Eur Econ Assoc, 2008, 6: 570–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Keeney R, Raiffa H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. New York: Wiley, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng C B, Chan H C C, Lin K C. Intelligent agents for e-marketplace: negotiation with issue trade-offs by fuzzy inference systems. Decis Supp Syst, 2006, 42: 626–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan, 430062, China

    LinLan Zhang

  2. Institute of Systems Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China

    LinLan Zhang, XueGuang Chen & Liu Hong

Authors
  1. LinLan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. XueGuang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liu Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Chen, X. & Hong, L. Optimality strategy of a sealed-offer simultaneous bargaining protocol. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 54, 79–90 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-010-4140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-010-4140-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation