iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/S11227-017-1960-7
Implementing fuzzy rank function model for a new supply chain risk management | The Journal of Supercomputing Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Implementing fuzzy rank function model for a new supply chain risk management

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intensive business competition has encouraged enterprises to focus more on their core activities to outsource the management of supply chain. Issues such as political crises, demand fluctuations, strategy variations, financial instability and natural disasters are the factors that can contribute to emergence of uncertainty and risk in the supply chain. Effective management of such risks is essential for reducing the vulnerability of the supply chain. Supply risk management is the most basic concept of the supply chain risk management; therefore, this study examines this subject by developing a mathematical model consisting of a set of equations to quantify typical risk such as delayed delivery, substandard quality, natural disasters and financial risk of the supplier. This model is designed to select and allocate orders to suppliers to minimize the supply risk imposed by the mentioned risk factors. A fuzzy-order function is implemented to turn this crisp model into a fuzzy supply chain risk assessment model. The defuzzified solutions of the fuzzy model show significant improvements over the result of crisp model. Uncertainty in supply chain and intense competitiveness between organizations and managers create different challenges. To effectively manage these challenges, new management approaches are used to strengthen and improve the effectiveness of organizations. The results show that the fuzzy model yields better results compared to the deterministic model. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the ability of the model for activities risk control is improved. The work presented addresses the same challenging problems that others have tried to address, but the methodology presented in this paper is more efficient in terms of execution performance and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vanany I, Zailani S, Pujawan N (2009) Supply chain risk management: literature review and future research. Int J Inf Syst Supply Chain Manag 2(1):16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103(2):451–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aven T (2011) On the new ISO guide on risk management terminology. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:719–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhry RM, Iqbal K (2013) Identification of risk management system in construction industry in Pakistan. J Manag Eng 29:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goh CS, Abdul-Rahaman H, Abdul Samad Z (2013) Applying risk management workshop for public construction projects: case study. J Constr Eng Manag 139:572–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. PMI (Project Management Institute) (2004) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Newtown Square, Delaware County

  7. Wu D, Olson D, Dolgui A (2015) Decision making in enterprise risk management: a review and introduction to special issue. Omega 57:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rohaninejad M, Bagherpour M (2013) Application of risk analysis within value management: a case study in DAM engineering. J Civ Eng Manag 19:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hochrainer-Stigler S, Mechler R, Mochizuki J (2015) A risk management tool for tackling country-wide contingent disasters: a case study on Madagascar. Environ Model Softw 72:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin L, Nilsson A, Sjolin J, Abrahamsson M, Tehler H (2015) On the perceived usefulness of risk descriptions for decision-making in disaster risk management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Svoboda M, Fuchs B, Poulsen CH, Nothwehr J (2015) The drought risk atlas: enhancing decision support for drought risk management in the United States. J Hydrol 526:274–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan F, Rathnayaka S, Ahmed S (2015) Methods and models in process safety and risk management: past, present and future. Process Saf Environ Prot 98:116–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dawson D, Mayger K, Thomas M, Thompson K (2015) Fatigue risk management by volunteer fire-fighters: use of informal strategies to augment formal policy. Accid Anal Prev 84:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lehtiranta L (2011) Relational risk management in construction projects: modeling the complexity. Leadersh Manag Eng 11:141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Adam T, Fernando CH, Golubeva E (2015) Managerial overconfidence and corporate risk management. J Bank Finance 60:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Veltman L, Cphrm MD (2015) Obstetrics hospitalists: risk management implications. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 42(3):507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeo K, Ren Y (2009) Risk management capability maturity model for complex product systems (CoPS) projects. J Syst Eng 12:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehtiranta L, Palojarvi L, Huovinen P (2010) Advancement of construction-related risk management concepts. In: Proceedings 18th CIB World Building Congress, pp 492–503

  19. Ethridge SH, Bredfeldt T, Sheedy K, Shirley S, Lopez G, Honeycutt M (2015) The Barnett Shale: from problem formulation to risk management. J Unconv Oil Gas Resour 11:95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Baloi P, Price A (2003) Modeling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. Int J Proj Manag 21(4):262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wehn U, Evers J (2015) The social innovation potential of ICT-enabled citizen observations to increase e-participation in local flood risk management. Technol Soc 42:187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadrich J, Johnson K (2015) Estimation of risk management effects on revenue and purchased feed costs on US dairy farms. J Dairy Sci 98(9):6588–6596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao X, Hwang BG, Low S (2013) Developing fuzzy enterprise risk management maturity model for construction firms. J Constr Eng Manag 139:1179–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Serpell A, Ferrada X, Rubio L, Arauzo S (2015) Evaluating risk management practices in construction organizations. Proc Soc Behav Sci 194:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huerga M, Banuls Silvera V, Turoff M (2015) A CIA–ISM scenario approach for analyzing complex cascading effects in operational risk management. Eng Appl Artif Intell 46:289–302

  26. Li G, Fan H, Lee P, Cheng TCE (2015) Joint supply chain risk management: an agency and collaboration perspective. Int J Prod Econ 164:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Giannakis M, Papadopoulos T (2016) Supply chain sustainability: a risk management approach. Int J Prod Econ 171:455–470

  28. Guadix J, Carrillo-Castrillo J, Onieva L, Lucena D (2015) Strategies for psychosocial risk management in manufacturing. J Bus Res 68(7):1475–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stornetta A, Engeli B, Zarn J, Gremaud G, Sturla SH (2015) Development of a risk management tool for prioritizing chemical hazard-food pairs and demonstration for selected my co toxins. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 72(2):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Koenig M, Meissner J (2015) Risk management policies for dynamic capacity control. Comput Oper Res 59:104–118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Adjei DN, Agyemang C, Dasah JB, Kuranchie P, Amoah AGB (2015) The effect of electronic reminders on risk management among diabetic patients in low resourced settings. J Diabetes Complicat 29(6):818–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin ET, Yao IS (2003) Fuzzy critical path method based on signed-distance ranking and statistical confidence-interval estimates. J Supercomput 24:305–325

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Allenotor D, Thulasiram RK (2013) A fuzzy grid-QoS framework for obtaining higher grid resources availability. J Supercomput 66:1231–1242. doi:10.1007/s11227-011-0728-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu CC, Lia LF, Chang YS (2012) Extending fuzzyCLIPS for parallelizing data-dependent fuzzy expert systems. J Supercomput 59:1379–1395. doi:10.1007/s11227-010-0542-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Garg R, Singh AK (2014) Multi-objective workflow grid scheduling using \(\varepsilon \)-fuzzy dominance sort based discrete particle swarm optimization. J Supercomput 68:709–732. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-1059-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Ji H, Ouyang C (2011) Multi target bearings-only tracking using fuzzy clustering technique and Gaussian particle filter. J Supercomput 58:4–19. doi:10.1007/s11227-010-0528-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Adabi S, Movaghar A, Rahmati AM (2014) Bi-level fuzzy based advanced reservation of Cloud workflow applications on distributed grid resources. J Supercomput 67:175–218. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-0994-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rezaee A, Rahmani AM, Movaghar A, Teshnehlab M (2014) Formal process algebraic modeling, verification, and analysis of an abstract fuzzy inference Cloud service. J Supercomput 67:345–383. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-1005-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jin H, Wang D, Wang H, Wang H (2007) Feedback fuzzy-DVS scheduling of control tasks. J Supercomput 41:147–162. doi:10.1007/s11227-006-0027-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cocaña-Fernández A, Ranilla J, Sánchez L (2015) Energy-efficient allocation of computing node slots in HPC clusters through parameter learning and hybrid genetic fuzzy system modeling. J Supercomput 71:1163–1174. doi:10.1007/s11227-014-1320-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Paul N, Singh A, Midya A, Roy PP, Dogra DP (2016) Moving object detection using modified temporal differencing and local fuzzy thresholding. J Supercomput. doi:10.1007/s11227-016-1815-7

    Google Scholar 

  42. Song G, Yang B, Wu Z, Chuai J, Zheng Y (2013) ROIN: reputation-oriented inverted indexing for the P2P network. J Supercomput 64:968–986. doi:10.1007/s11227-013-0878-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mehrali-Dehnavi M, Aqaei A (2013) supply risk management using by value tool encounter risk based Ferin theory. Qual Bus Res 66:161–194

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ravindran A, Ravi BR, Ufuk W, Vijay T, Yang T (2010) Risk adjusted multi criteria supplier selection models with applications. Int J Prod Res 48(2):405–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang T (2007) Multi objective optimization models for managing supply risk in supply chains. A thesis, Industrial Engineering and Operations Research

  46. Tansel Y (2012) Development of a credit limit allocation model for banks using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and linear programming. J Expert Syst Appl 39:5309–5316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hatami A, Kazemipour H (2014) Solving fully fuzzy linear programing with symmetric trapezoidal numbers using Mehars method. J Math Comput Sci 4(2):463–470

    Google Scholar 

  48. Farhadinia B (2014) Sensitivity analysis in interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy number linear programming problems. J Appl Math Model 38:50–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Stanojevi B, Stanojevi M (2015) Comment on fuzzy mathematical programming for multi objective linear fractional programming problem. J Fuzzy Sets Syst 4:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kumar A, Kaur J, Singh P (2011) A new method for solving fully fuzzy linear programming problems. Appl Math Model 35:817–823

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

    Ali Mostafaeipour & Mojtaba Qolipour

  2. Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Hamidreza Eslami

Authors
  1. Ali Mostafaeipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mojtaba Qolipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamidreza Eslami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Mostafaeipour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mostafaeipour, A., Qolipour, M. & Eslami, H. Implementing fuzzy rank function model for a new supply chain risk management. J Supercomput 73, 3586–3602 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-1960-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-017-1960-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation