iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/S10836-011-5217-8
A Java Framework to Specify Faultloads for Fault Injection Campaigns | Journal of Electronic Testing Skip to main content
Log in

A Java Framework to Specify Faultloads for Fault Injection Campaigns

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an operational environment, the identification and reproduction of faults may be hard to be done, specially in complex systems. Use of fault injection accelerates this process, improving the test of fault tolerance mechanisms. However, there are a significant amount of fault injectors available, using several different approaches. This diversity of tools, each one with different methods to describe faultloads for fault injection campaigns, imposes severe obstacles to the efficient use of such fault injectors. In this context, this paper presents jFaultload, which applies Java for the specification of faultloads and translates them to specific formats that are appropriate to each available fault injector. Fault injectors for communication systems were integrated in the environment and completes the test scenario. The service under test used to demonstrate the usability and expressiveness of our solution is a video streaming session using RTP Protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolchini C, Pomante L, Salice F, Sciuto D (2002) Reliability properties assessment at system level: a co-design framework. J Electron Test 18(3):351–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson S, Jahanian F, Mitton T, Tung T-L (1996) Testing of fault-tolerant and real-time distributed systems via protocol fault injection. In: Symposium on fault-tolerant computing, pp 404–414

  3. Drebes RJ, Leite FO, Jacques-Silva G, Weber TS (2005) ComFIRM: a communication fault injector for protocol testing and validation. Latin American Test Workshop (LATW)

  4. Godambe NJ, Shi CJR (1998) Behavioral level noise modeling and jitter simulation of phase-locked loops with faults using VHDL-AMS. J Electron Test 13(1):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gulati K, Khatri SP (2010) Fault table computation on GPUs. J Electron Test 26(2):195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han S, Shin K, Rosenberg H (1995) DOCTOR: an integrated software fault injection environment for distributed real-time systems. In: Int. computer performance and dependability symposium, (IPDS’95). IEEE Computer Society Press, Erlangen, Germany, pp 204–213

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoarau W, Tixeuil S (2005) A language-driven tool for fault injection in distributed systems. In: Proc. of the 6th IEEE/ACM intl. workshop on grid computing, Grand Large, França, pp 194–201

  8. Hsueh M-C, Tsai TK, Iyer RK (1997) Fault injection techniques and tools. IEEE Comput 30(4):75–82

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li X, Martin R, Nagaraja K, Nguyen TD, Zhang B (2002) Mendosus: a SAN-based fault-injection test-bed for the construction of highly available network services. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on novel uses of system area networks (SAN-1)

  10. Muhammad H, Barcellos M (2002) Simulating group communication protocols through an object-oriented framework. In: 35th annual simulation symposium, IEEE, New York

  11. Munaretti R, Weber T, Cechin S (2009) Detailed description of communication faultloads to improve the usability of fault injection testing tools. In: XXXV Latin American informatics conference, vol 1. Pelotas, UFPEL, pp 1–10

  12. Munaretti R, Fiss B, Weber T, Cechin S (2010) Experimental dependability assessment using a faultload specification tool. In: Test workshop, 2010, LATW ’10. 11th Latin American, pp 1–6

  13. Oláh J, Majzik I (2009) A model based framework for specifying and executing fault injection experiments. IEEE fourth international conference on dependability of computer systems, pp 107–114

  14. Schulzrinne H, Casner S, Frederick R, Jacobson V (2003) RTP: a transport protocol for real-time applications. RFC 3550 (Standard), Updated by RFC 5506

  15. Siqueira T, Fiss B, Weber R, Cechin S, Weber T (2009) Applying FIRMAMENT to test the SCTP communication protocol under network faults. In: Test Workshop, 2009. LATW ’09. 10th Latin American, pp 1–6

  16. Stott D, Floering B, Burke D, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK (2000) NFTAPE: a framework for assessing dependability in distributed systems with lightweight fault injectors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international computer performance and dependability symposium, pp 91–100

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruthiano Simioni Munaretti.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: F. Vargas

A presentation based on this article was made at the Eleventh IEEE Latin-American Test Workshop, Punta del Este, Uruguay, March 28–31, 2010.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munaretti, R.S., Weber, T.S., Cechin, S.L. et al. A Java Framework to Specify Faultloads for Fault Injection Campaigns. J Electron Test 27, 531–539 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-011-5217-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-011-5217-8

Keywords

Navigation