iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/S10339-012-0525-1
Prosocial attitudes and empathic behavior in emotional positive versus negative situations: brain response (ERPs) and source localization (LORETA) analysis | Cognitive Processing Skip to main content
Log in

Prosocial attitudes and empathic behavior in emotional positive versus negative situations: brain response (ERPs) and source localization (LORETA) analysis

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cognitive Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research firstly investigated the neural correlates (ERPs, event-related potentials) of attitudes to engage in prosocial-helping behaviors, and secondly, it analyzed the relation between these brain-based potentials and personal profile (high vs. low empathic profile). It was considered the subjects’ behavior in response to specific emotional situations (positive vs. negative) in case it was required a possible prosocial intervention. Thirty-one subjects were invited to empathize with the emotional contexts (videotapes that reproduced two person’s exchanges) and to decide whether to intervene or not to support these persons. BEES questionnaire for empathic behavior was submitted to the subjects after the experimental session. ERP acquisition and LORETA source analysis revealed a negative ongoing deflection (N200 effect) more prefrontally distributed (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) in response to prosocial intervention options mainly for negative and positive contexts. Moreover, a significant positive correlation was found between high-empathic profiles, intervention behaviors (higher frequency of interventions) and N200 amplitude (higher peak). These results highlight the role of emotions in prosocial behavior, since the N200 effect was considered a marker of the emotional significance of the interpersonal situation. Secondly, the empathic trait may explain the prosocial decisional processes: Higher empathic trait contributes to induce subject’s intervention behavior which in turn appears to be directly related to the cortical responsiveness within the prefrontal areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Adolphs R (1999) Social cognition and the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci 3:469–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Bortolotti A (2011) Resonance mechanism in empathic behavior BEES, BIS/BAS and psychophysiological contribution. Physiol Behav 105:298–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Bortolotti A (2012) Detection of the facial expression of emotion and self-report measures in empathic situations are influenced by sensorimotor circuit inhibition by low-frequency rTMS. Brain Stimul 5:330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Lucchiari C (2005) In the face of emotions: event-related potentials in supraliminal and subliminal facial expression recognition. Genet Soc Gen Psychol 131:41–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Mazza G (2009) Brain oscillations and BIS/BAS (behavioral inhibition/activation system) effects on processing masked emotional cues. ERS/ERD and coherence measures of alpha band. Int J Psychophysiol 74:158–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Mazza G (2010) Lateralisation effect in comprehnsion of emotional facial expression: a comparison between EEG alpha band power and behavioural inhibition (BIS) and activation (BAS) systems. Laterality 4:1257–1268

    Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Pozzoli U (2003) Face-selective processing and the effect of pleasant and unpleasant emotional expressions on ERP correlates. Int J Psychophysiol 49:67–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Pozzoli U (2005) Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli. J Psycholinguist Res 34:71–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Pozzoli U (2007) Event-related oscillations (EROs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) comparison in facial expression recognition. J Neuropsychol 1:283–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Pozzoli U (2008) Event- related oscillation and event-related potentials in emotional faces recognition. A regression analysis. Int J Neurosci 2:4–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Pozzoli U (2009) Arousal effect on emotional face comprehension. Frequency band changes in different time intervals. Physiol Behav 97:455–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Scioli S (2011) Error monitoring functions in response to an external feedback when an explicit judgement is required: ERP modulation and cortical source localization. Int J Psychophysiol 83:295–301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Terenzi A (2012) Neuropsychology of moral judgment and risk seeking: what in common? A new look at emotional contribution to decision-making. In: Innocenti A, Sirigu A (eds) Neuroscience and the economics of decision making. Routledge, USA, pp 86–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Brambilla E, Falbo L (2009) Appetitive vs defensive responses to emotional cues. Autonomic measures and brain oscillation modulation. Brain Res 1296:72–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balconi M, Bortolotti A, Gonzaga L (2011) Emotional face recognition, EMG response, and medial prefrontal activity in empathic behavior. Neurosci Res 71:251–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beer JS (in press) The importance of emotion cognition interactions for social adjustment: insight from the orbitofrontal cortex. In: Harmon-Jones E, Winkielman P (eds) The handbook of social neuroscience. Guilford, New York

  • Beer JS, Heerey EA, Keltner D, Scabini D, Knight RT (2003) The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insight from patients with orbitofrontal damage. J Pers Soc Psychol 85:594–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bersoff DM (1999) Explaining unethical behaviour among people motivated to act prosocially. J Moral Educ 28:413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown LM, Bradley MM, Lang PJ (2006) Affective reactions to pictures of ingroup and outgroup members. Biol Psychol 71:303–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlo G, Hausmann A, Chistiansen S, Randall BA (2003) Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. J Early Adolesc 23:107–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu IL, Evans AD, Lee K (2010) The neural correlates of reasoning about prosocial-helping decision: an event-related brain potential study. Brain Res 1369:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley J, Batson CD (1973) “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 27:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley J, Latané B (1968) Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. J Pers Soc Psychol 10:215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer D, Van Lange PAM (2001) Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. Eur J Pers 15:s5–s18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N, Miller PA, Shell R, McNalley S, Shae C (1991) Prosocial development in adolescence: a longitudinal study. Dev Psychol 27:849–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P, Friesen WV (1976) Pictures of facial affect. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley N, Dunning D (2000) Feeling “holier than thou”: are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? J Pers Soc Psychol 79:861–875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani M, Gratton G, Coles MGH (2000) Event-related brain potentials. Methods, theory and applications. In: Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson GD (eds) Handbook of psychophysiology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche BA, Finkelstein MA, Penner LA (2000) To help or not to help: capturing individuals’ decision policies. J Soc Behav Pers 28:561–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene JD, Haidt J (2002) How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn Sci 6:517–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hein G, Silani G, Preuschoff K, Batson CD, Singer T (2010) Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron 68:149–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hein G, Lamm C, Brodbeck C, Singer T (2011) Conductance response predicts costly helping. PLoS ONE 6:e22759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanske P, Kotz SA (2010) Modulation of early conflict processing: N200 responses to emotional words in a flanker task. Neuropsychologia 48:3661–3664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm C, Batson CD, Decety J (2007) The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. J Cogn Neurosci 19:42–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher S (2005) Identity emergency intervention: how social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 31:443–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masten CL, Telzer EH, Eisenberg NI (2011) An fMRI investigation of attributing negative social treatment to racial discrimination. J Cogn Neurosci 23:1042–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian A, Epstein N (1972) A measure of emotional empathy. J Pers 40:525–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neff KD, Turiel E, Anshel D (2002) Reasoning about interpersonal responsibility when making judgments about scenarios involving close personal relationships. Psychol Rep 90:723–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner KN, Ray RD, Cooper JC, Robertson ER, Chopra S, Gabrieli JD, Gross JJ (2004) For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up- regulation of negative emotion. Neuroimage 23:483–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D (1994) Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Phsycophysiol 18:49–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA (2005) Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annu Rev Psychol 56:365–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preston SD, de Waal FBM (2002) Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci 25:1–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Segalowitz SJ, Davies PL (2004) Charting the maturation of the frontal lobe: an electrophysiological strategy. Brain Cogn 55:116–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Streit M, Wolwer W, Brinkmeyer J et al (2000) Electrophysiological correlates of emotional and structural face processing in humans. Neurosci Lett 278:13–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wild B, Erb M, Bartels M (2001) Are emotions contagious? Evoked emotions while viewing emotionally expressive faces: quality, quantity, time course and gender differences. Psychiat Res 102:109–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present research was supported by Catholic University Research Found D1.1. 2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michela Balconi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balconi, M., Canavesio, Y. Prosocial attitudes and empathic behavior in emotional positive versus negative situations: brain response (ERPs) and source localization (LORETA) analysis. Cogn Process 14, 63–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0525-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0525-1

Keywords

Navigation