iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/S00498-023-00347-4
Input-to-state stability of soft-reset systems with nonlinear data | Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Skip to main content
Log in

Input-to-state stability of soft-reset systems with nonlinear data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Input-to-state stability (ISS) is considered for a nonlinear “soft-reset” system with inputs. The latter is a system that approximates a hard-reset system, which is modeled as a hybrid system with inputs. In contrast, a soft-reset system is modeled as a differential inclusion with inputs. Lyapunov conditions on the hard-reset system are given that guarantee ISS for the soft-reset system. In turn, it is shown when global asymptotic stability for the origin of the zero-input reset system guarantees ISS for nonzero inputs. Examples are given to demonstrate the theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sontag ED (1989) Smooth stabilization implies coprime factorization. IEEE Trans Autom Control 34:435–443

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang ZP, Teel AR, Praly L (1994) Small-gain theorem for ISS systems and applications. Math Control Signal Syst 7:95–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Clegg JC (1958) A nonlinear integrator for servomechanisms. Trans Am Inst Electr Eng Part II Appl Ind 77(1):41–42

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horowitz I, Rosenbaum P (1975) Non-linear design for cost of feedback reduction in systems with large parameter uncertainty. Int J Control 21(6):977–1001

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Krishnan K, Horowitz I (1974) Synthesis of a non-linear feedback system with significant plant-ignorance for prescribed system tolerances. Int J Control 19(4):689–706

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu H, Zheng Y, Chait Y, Hollot C (1997) On the zero-input stability of control systems with clegg integrators. In: Proceedings of the 1997 American control conference, vol 1, pp 408–410

  7. Hollot C, Zheng Y, Chait Y (1997) Stability analysis for control systems with reset integrators. In: Proceedings of the 36th IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 2, pp 1717–1719

  8. Chait Y, Hollot C (2002) On Horowitz’s contributions to reset control. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 12(4):335–355

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Beker O, Hollot C, Chait Y, Han H (2004) Fundamental properties of reset control systems. Automatica 40(6):905–915

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Beker O, Hollot CV, Chait Y (2001) Plant with integrator: an example of reset control overcoming limitations of linear feedback. IEEE Trans Autom Control 46(11):1797–1799

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Beker O, Hollot C, Chait Y (1999) Stability of a MIMO reset control system under constant inputs. In: Proceedings of the 38th IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 3, pp 2780–2781

  12. Haddad WM, Chellabsina V, Kablar N (2000) Active control of combustion instabilities via hybrid resetting controllers. In: Proceedings of the 2000 American control conference. ACC, vol 4, pp 2378–2382

  13. Goebel R, Hespanha J, Teel AR, Cai C, Sanfelice R (2004) Hybrid systems: generalized solutions and robust stability. IFAC Proc 37(13):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goebel R, Teel AR (2006) Solutions to hybrid inclusions via set and graphical convergence with stability theory applications. Automatica 42(4):573–587

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Goebel R, Sanfelice RG, Teel AR (2009) Hybrid dynamical systems. IEEE Control Syst Mag 29(2):28–93

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nešić D, Zaccarian L, Teel AR (2008) Stability properties of reset systems. Automatica 44(8):2019–2026

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nesic D, Teel AR, Zaccarian L (2011) Stability and performance of SISO control systems with first-order reset elements. IEEE Trans Autom Control 56(11):2567–2582

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zheng J, Guo Y, Fu M, Wang Y, Xie L (2007) Improved reset control design for a PZT positioning stage. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on control applications, pp 1272–1277

  19. Fernández A, Barreiro A, Banos A, Carrasco J (2008) Reset control for passive teleoperation. In: 34th Annual conference of IEEE industrial electronics, pp 2935–2940

  20. Teel AR (2021) Continuous-time implementation of reset control systems. In: Trends in nonlinear and adaptive control—a tribute to Laurent Praly for his 65th birthday, Springer, pp 27–42

  21. Bertollo R, Teel AR, Zaccarian L Continuous-time reset control with max-of-quadratics Lyapunov certificates (submitted)

  22. Le JH, Teel AR (2021) Passive soft-reset controllers for nonlinear systems. In: 2021 60th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 5320–5325

  23. Goebel R, Sanfelice RG, Teel AR (2012) Hybrid dynamical systems: modeling, stability, and robustness. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Rockafellar RT, Wets RJB (1998) Variational analysis, vol 317. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Dellarossa M, Tanwani A, Zaccarian L (2021) Non-pathological ISS-Lyapunov functions for interconnected differential inclusions. IEEE Trans Autom Control

  26. Clarke FH, Ledyaev YS, Stern RJ (1998) Asymptotic stability and smooth Lyapunov functions. J Differ Equ 149(1):69–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura H, Yamashita Y, Nishitani H (2002) Smooth Lyapunov functions for homogeneous differential inclusions. In: Proceedings of the 41st SICE annual conference, SICE 2002, vol 3, pp 1974–1979

  28. Ryan E (1991) A universal adaptive stabilizer for a class of nonlinear systems. Syst Control Lett 16(3):209–218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under grant AFOSR FA9550-21-1-0452.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew R. Teel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Special issue for Eduardo Sontag’s 70th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baradaran Hosseini, M., Le, J.H. & Teel, A.R. Input-to-state stability of soft-reset systems with nonlinear data. Math. Control Signals Syst. 35, 523–540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-023-00347-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00498-023-00347-4

Keywords

Navigation