iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/BF01002334
Computer diagnosis of goiters. V. The input | International Journal of Parallel Programming Skip to main content
Log in

Computer diagnosis of goiters. V. The input

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A scheme in which model construction and operation are considered as distinct processes has been designed for the differential diagnosis of goiters. The influence of classification and observation errors and of the recognition method on the diagnostic accuracy has been determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Alperovitch and J. Lellouch, “L'aide au diagnostic. Bilans et perspectives,”Rev. Inf. Med. 3:205–215 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Andersen and J. A. Boyle, “Computer diagnosis: Statistical aspects,”Br. Med Bull. 24:230–235 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. T. J. Bailey, “Probability Methods of Diagnosis Based on Small Samples, inMathematics and Computer Sciences in Biology and Medicine (Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 1965), pp. 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. B. Bean, “The natural history of error.Pseudodoxia endemica”Arch. Int. Med. 105:184–193 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. E. Bennett and W. W. Holland, “The Medical Record and the Computer. I. The Selection of Input,” inComputers in the Service of Medicine, Vol. 2, G. McLachlan and R. A. Shegog, Eds. (Oxford University Press, London, 1968), pp. 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Bouckaert, “Computer diagnosis of goiters. I-Classification and differential diagnosis,”J. Chron. Dis. 24:299–310 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bouckaert, “Computer-aided diagnosis of goitres in a cancer department,”Int. J. Bio-Med Comput. 3:3–15 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Bouckaert, “Computer diagnosis of goiters. IV. The optimal planning of physical observations,”Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 3:71–92 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Bouckaert, J. de Plaen, J. A. Kapita, and S. Ditu, “Statistical analysis of symptoms for the differential diagnosis of goiters,”Ann. Soc. Belg. Med. Trop. 52:113–126 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Darling and J. G. Rausdeps, “Nonparametric unsupervised learning with applications to image classification,”Pattern Recognition 2:313–335 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. G. Davies, “Observer variation in reports on electrocardiograms,”Br. Heart J. 18:568 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart,Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. M. Fletcher, “Clinical diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema: experimental study,”Proc. R. Soc. Med. 45:577–584 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. H. Garland, “Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures,”Am. J. Roentgenol. 82:25–37 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. R. Goldberg, “Man versus model of man: a rationale plus some evidence for a method on improving on clinical inferences,”Psychol. Bull. 73:422–432 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Gremy, D. Salmon, and H. Joly, “Quelques aspects de la théorie de la dé cision en médecine: application du théorème de Bayes,”Rev. Fr. Clin. Biol. 14:88–95 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Groth-Petersen, A. Lovgren, and J. Thillemann, “On reliability of reading of photofluorograms and value of dual readings,”Acta Tuberc. Scand. 26:13–37 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. H. Gruver and E. D. Preis, “A study of diagnostic errors,”Ann. Int. Med. 47:108–120 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. B. Hennessy, “Goitre prophylaxis in New Guinea with intramuscular injection of iodized oil,”Med. J. Aust. 1:505–512 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. J. Jesdinsky, “Diagnose-Modelle in der Medizin,”Method. Inf. Med. 11:48–59 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. E. Larsen, D. O. Walter, J. J. McNew, and W. R. Adey, “On the problem of bias in error rate estimation for discriminant analysis,”Pattern Recognition 3:217–224 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. McLennan, E. Gaitan, and M. C. Miller, “Observer Variation in Grading and Measuring the Thyroid in Epidemiological Surveys,” inEndemic Goiter, J. B. Stanbury, Ed. (PAHO, WHO, New York, 1969), pp. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. A. Nordyke, C. A. Kulikowski, and C. W. Kulikowski, “A comparison of methods for the automated diagnosis of thyroid dysfunction,”Comput. Biomed. Res. 4:374–389 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. J. Smith, “Errors in diagnostic radiology. On the basis of complacency,”Am. J. Roentgenol. 94:689–703 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. C. Smyllie, L. M. Blendis, and P. Armitage, “Observer disagreement in physical signs of the respiratory system,”Lancet 2 412–413 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouckaert, A. Computer diagnosis of goiters. V. The input. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 6, 237–261 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002334

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01002334

Key words

Navigation