iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/BF00750741
The interfunctionality of talk and text | Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Skip to main content
Log in

The interfunctionality of talk and text

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding more about how socially distributed cognition operates within a group of writers has implications for the design of technologies to support collaborative writing. This paper presents a chronology of a writing episode in which the communicative practices of collaborating writers and the representations they use to mediate cognition are investigated. The talk generated by the participants discussing how to write an essay provides data for illuminating the group's interactions and is a focus for investigating how this talk becomes metamorphosed into writing. The analysis charts the evolution of a co-authored text through a cycle of activity which is both cognitive and social in orientation and demonstrates the interfunctionality of talk and text for the processes involved in collaborative writing. This suggests that computer systems which support only text-based communication could limit the ways in which talk acts as a mediator for cognition and thus constrain important aspects of collaborative writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakhtin, M.M. (1981):The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Eevi E. and V.M.E. Bellotti (1993): Informed Opportunism as Strategy: Supporting Coordination in Distributed Collaborative Writing. InECSCW'93. Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Milan, Italy, eds. G. de Michelis, C. Simone and K. Schmidt. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Eevi (1994):Practices of Collaboration in Writing and Their Support. Unpublished D. Phil. thesis, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.

  • Bereiter, C. and M. Scardamalia (1987):The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, Kenneth A. (1984): Collaborative learning and the ‘conversation of mankind’.College English, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 635–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalfonte, B.L., R.S. Fish and R.E. Kraut (1991). Expressive Richness: a Comparison of Speech and Text as Media for Revision. InProceedings of CHI'91 (New Orleans, Louisiana). ACM: New York, pp. 99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Brennan (1991): Grounding in Communication. InPerspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, eds. L. Resnick, J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, Lisa and Andrea Lunsford (1990):Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finholt, T., L. Sproull and S. Kiesler (1990): Communication and Performance in ad hoc Task Groups. InIntellectual teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, eds. J. Galegher, R.E. Kraut and C. Egido. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, Linda and John R. Hayes (1981): A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.College Composition and Communication, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 365–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galegher, J. and R.E. Kraut (1994): Computer-mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: An Experiment in Group Writing.Information Systems Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galegher, J. and R.E. Kraut (1992): Computer-mediated Communication and Collaborative Writing: Media Influence and Adaptation to Communication Constraints. InCSCW'92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 31 to Nov. 4, 1992, eds. Jon Turner and Robert Kraut, New York: ACM Press, pp. 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galegher, J. and R.E. Kraut (1990): Computer-mediated Communication for Intellectual Teamwork: A Field Experiment in Group Writing. InProceedings of CSCW 90, Los Angeles, Ca. ACM: New York, pp. 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles (1994): Professional Vision.American Anthropologist, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 606–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1987):The Interface Between the Written and the Oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, L.W. and E.R. Steinberg, eds. (1980):Cognitive Processes in Writing: an Interdisciplinary Approach. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haake, Jörg M. and Brian Wilson (1992): Supporting Collaborative Writing of Hyperdocuments in SEPIA. InCSCW'92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 31 to Nov. 4, 1992, eds. Jon Turner and Robert Kraut. New York: ACM Press, pp. 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. and A. Sellen (1995):Paper-Supported Collaborative Work. RXRC Technical Report, Cambridge, England.

  • Harris, R. (1989): How Does Writing Restructure Thought?Language and Communication, vol. 9, no. 2/3, pp. 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Lorraine, L. Flower and J. Petraglia (1992): Planning Text Together: The Role of Critical Reflection in Student Collaboration.Written Communication, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 48–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995):Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, C.M. and G.M. Olson (1992): Unblocking Brainstorming Through the Use of a Simple Group Editor. InCSCW'92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 31 to Nov. 4, 1992, eds. Jon Turner and Robert Kraut. New York: ACM Press, pp. 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lay, M.M. and W.M. Karis, eds. (1991): Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in Theory and Practice. Amityville, N.Y.: Baywood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff, P., C. Heath and D. Greatbatch (1992): Tasks-in-interaction: Paper and Screen Based Documentation in Collaborative Activity. InCSCW'92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 31 to Nov. 4, 1992, eds. Jon Turner and Robert Kraut. New York: ACM Press, pp. 163–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, K. and P. Golder (1994): A New Architecture for a Collaborative Authoring System: Collabor Writer.Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Work, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J.C., V.C. Miles and A. Monk (1991): An experimental study of common ground in text-based communication. InProceedings of CHI'91, New Orleans, Louisiana. ACM Press: New York, pp. 209–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (1992):Hand and Mind-What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medway, P. (forthcoming): Writing, Speaking, Drawing: the Distribution of Meaning in Architects' Communication. To appear inThe New Writing Environment, eds. M. Sharples and T. van der Geest.

  • Miles, V.C., J.C. McCarthy, A.J. Dix, M.D. Harrison and A.F. Monk (1993): Reviewing Designs for a Synchronous-asynchronous Group Editing Environment. InComputer Supported Collaborative Writing, ed. M. Sharples. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A., I. Posner and R. Baecker (1995): Learning to write together using groupware. InProceedings of CHI'95, Denver, Colorado. New York: ACM Press, pp. 288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, C.M., D.S. Kaufer, R. Chandok and J.H. Morris (1994): Computer Support for Distributed Collaborative Writing: Defining Parameters of Interaction. InCSCW'94. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Oct. 22–26, 1994, eds. R. Furuta and C. Neuwirth, New York: ACM Press, pp. 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, David R. (1977): From Utterance to Text: The Bias of Language in Speech and Writing.Harvard Educational Review, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.S., G.M. Olson and D.K. Meader (1995): What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work? InProceedings of CHI'95, Denver, Colorado. New York: ACM Press, pp. 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J.S., G.M. Olson, L.A. Mack and P. Wellner (1990): Concurrent Editing: The Group's Interface. InInteract'90-Proceedings of the IFIP TC 13 Third International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, UK. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, Lydia, M. Sharples and J. Goodlet (1993):The Development of a Cognitive Model for Computer Support of Collaborative Writing. Collaborative Writing Research Group report no. 9, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.

  • Posner, Ilona and Ronald M. Baecker (1993): How People Write Together. InReadings in Group-ware and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, ed. Ronald M. Baecker. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L., J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley, eds. (1991):Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, P. (1992): HyperVoice: A Phone-based CSCW Platform. InCSCW'92. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, Oct. 31 to Nov. 4, 1992, eds. Jon Turner and Robert Kraut. New York: ACM Press, pp. 218–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Yvonne and Judi Ellis (1994): Distributed Cognition: An Alternative Framework for Analysing and Explaining Collaborative Working.Journal of Information Technology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., M. Ramage and Y. Rogers (forthcoming):PETRA: Participatory Evaluation Through Redesign and Analysis. To appear inInteracting with Computers.

  • Salomon, Gavriel, ed. (1993):Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanual A. (1991): Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition. InPerspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, eds. L. Resnick, J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley. Washington, DC: American Psychological Assoc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, Mike, ed. (1993a):Computer Supported Collaborative Writing. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, Mike (1993b):Computer Support for the Rhythm of Writing. Cognitive Science Research Paper no. 285, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.

  • Stifelman, L., B. Arons, C. Schmandt and E. Hulteen (1993): VoiceNotes: A Speech Interface for a Hand-held Voice Notetaker. InProceedings of INTERCHI'93, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 24–29 April, 1993, pp. 179–186.

  • Wertsch, James V. (1991):Voices of the Mind-a Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S., D. Frohlich and O. Daly-Jones (1994a): Informal Workplace Communication: What is it Like and How Might we Support it? InCSCW'94. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Oct. 22–26, 1994, eds. R. Furuta and C. Neuwirth, New York: ACM Press, pp. 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, S., P. Hyland and M. Wiley (1994b). Filochat: Handwritten Notes Provide Access to Recorded Conversations. InProceedings of CHI'94, April 24–28 1994, Boston, Ma, pp. 271–277.

  • Whittaker, S., S.E. Brennan and H.H. Clarke (1991): Co-ordinating Activity: An Analysis of Interaction in Computer-supported Cooperative Work. InProceedings of CHI'91, New Orleans, Louisiana. New York: ACM, pp. 361–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Charles C. (1993):A Cognitive Dimensional Analysis of Idea Sketches. Cognitive Science Research Paper no. 275, School of Cognitive and Computing Sciences, University of Sussex.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plowman, L. The interfunctionality of talk and text. Comput Supported Coop Work 3, 229–246 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750741

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750741

Key words

Navigation