Abstract
Drawing sketches while designing plays an essential role in crystallising design ideas. Past literature has revealed important aspects of sketching that facilitate design processes. There has been no empirical study, however, to reveal how sketches are involved in the very process in which the structures of designers’ actions are dynamically formed. We have devised a general scheme to code designers’ actions belonging to different cognitive levels. Based on the scheme, we analyzed the process of a practicing architect. We found evidence that suggests the following insights. First, the role of sketching is mostly to leave ideas on paper for later inspection and thus perception, rather than to give simultaneous incentives for perception. Second, the role of perception is to stimulate functional thoughts, especially in the phase of detailed exploration. Third, therefore, design behaviors are situated in the physical setting in which designers draw and perceive. Based on these insights, we have proposed the concept of a set of different types of design support tools. They should assist designers’ actions to draw and perceive while maintaining the situatedness of design behaviors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akin, O.: 1993, Architects’ reasoning with structures and functions, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,20, 273–294.
Akin, O. and Lin, C.: 1995, Design protocol data and novel design decisions, Design Studies, 16(2), 211–236.
Agre, P. E., and Chapman, D.: 1987, Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity, Proceedings of AAAI-87, Seattle, WA, pp. 268–272.
Chan, C-S.: 1990, Cognitive processes in architectural design problem solving, Design Studies, 11(2), 60–80.
Dorst, K and Dijkhuis, J.: 1995, Comparing paradigms for describing design activity, Design Studies, 16(2), 261–274.
Eastman, C. M.: 1970, On the analysis of intuitive design processes, in G. T. Moore (ed.), Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp.21–37.
Eckersley, M.: 1988, The form of design processes: A protocol analysis study, Design Studies, 9(2), 86–94.
Gero, J. S. and McNeill T.: 1998, An approach to the analysis of design protocols, Design Studies, 19(1), 21–61.
Goel, V.: 1995, Sketches of thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Goldschmidt, G.: 1991, The dialectics of sketching, Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.
Gross, M. D.: 1996, The electronic Cocktail Napkin - A computational environment for working with design diagrams, Design Studies, 17(1), 53–69.
Kirsh, D.: 1995, The intelligence use of space, Artificial Intelligence. 73(1,2), 31–68.
Kramer, A.: 1994, Translucent patches: Dissolving windows, Proceedings of UIST’94, ACM, New York, pp.121–130.
Krauss, R. I. and Myer, R. M.: 1970, Design: a case history, in G. T. Moore (ed.) Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp.11–20.
Landay, J. A. and Myers, B. A.: 1995, Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design, Human Factors in Computing Systems: Proceedings of CHI’95, ACM, New York, pp. 43–50.
McGinnis, B. D. and Ullman, D. G.: 1992, The evolution of commitments in the design of a component, Journal of Mechanical Design, 114(1), 1–7.
Purcell, T., Gero, J., Edwards, H., and McNeill, T.: 1994, The data in design protocols: The issue of data coding, data analysis in the development of models of the design process, in J. S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds), Artificial Intelligence in Design ‘84, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 225–252.
Schön, D. A. and Wiggins, G.: 1992, Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156.
Someren, M. W. van, Barnard, Y. F. and Sandberth, J. A. C.: 1994, The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes, Academic Press, London.
Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J.: 1995, A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation, Cognitive Science, 19(1), 97–140.
Suwa, M. and Gross, M. D.: 1998, Enriching perception: A new paradigm for design sketching tools, Asia Pacific Human Computer Interaction’98 (in press).
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B.: 1996, What architects see in their design sketches: Implications for design tools, Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’96 Conference Companion, ACM, New York, pp.191–192
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B.: 1997a, How do architects interact with their design sketches in exploring design ideas? Proceedings of 4th Australasian Cognitive Science Conference ‘87, Newcastle, Australia (to appear).
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B.: 1997b, What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis, Design Studies, 18(4), 385–403.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T. (1998). Analysis of Cognitive Processes of a Designer as the Foundation for Support Tools. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5121-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6153-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5121-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive