iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64322-8_8
An Empirical Analysis of Privacy in the Lightning Network | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

An Empirical Analysis of Privacy in the Lightning Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC 2021)

Abstract

Payment channel networks, and the Lightning Network in particular, seem to offer a solution to the lack of scalability and privacy offered by Bitcoin and other blockchain-based cryptocurrencies. Previous research has focused on the scalability, availability, and crypto-economics of the Lightning Network, but relatively little attention has been paid to exploring the level of privacy it achieves in practice. This paper presents a thorough analysis of the privacy offered by the Lightning Network, by presenting several attacks that exploit publicly available information about the network in order to learn information that is designed to be kept secret, such as how many coins a node has available or who the sender and recipient are in a payment routed through the network.

G. Kappos and H. Yousaf—Contributed equally. Full version of paper available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.12470.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://1ml.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://ln.bigsun.xyz/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.bitrefill.com/.

  4. 4.

    http://lnbig.com/.

  5. 5.

    Bitrefill, for example, sells a channel with an incoming balance of 5000000 satoshis (the equivalent at the time of writing of 493.50 USD) for 8.48 USD.

  6. 6.

    This would rather be a clique excluding a link between the sender and recipient, since otherwise they would presumably use their channel directly.

  7. 7.

    https://enterprise.verizon.com/terms/latency/.

  8. 8.

    https://metrics.torproject.org/onionperf-latencies.html.

  9. 9.

    https://networkx.github.io/documentation/stable/reference/algorithms/shortest_paths.html.

References

  1. The lightning conference: of channels, flows and icebergs talk by Christian Decker. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zk7hcJDQH-I

  2. Lightning network specifications. https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc

  3. Person behind 40% of LN’s capacity: “I have no doubt in Bitcoin and the Lightning Network”. https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/41083/person-behind-40-of-lns-capacity-i-have-no-doubt-in-bitcoin-and-the-lightning-network

  4. Androulaki, E., Karame, G.O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T., Capkun, S.: Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin. In: Sadeghi, A.-R. (ed.) FC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7859, pp. 34–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Béres, F., Seres, I.A., Benczúr, A.A.: A cryptoeconomic traffic analysis of Bitcoins lightning network. arXiv:1911.09432 (2019)

  6. Biryukov, A., Feher, D., Vitto, G.: Privacy aspects and subliminal channels in Zcash. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biryukov, A., Khovratovich, D., Pustogarov, I.: Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network. In: Proceedings of ACM CCS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bogatyy, I.: Linking 96% of Grin transactions. https://github.com/bogatyy/grin-linkability

  9. Brânzei, S., Segal-Halevi, E., Zohar, A.: How to charge lightning. arXiv:1712.10222 (2017)

  10. Conoscenti, M., Vetrò, A., De Martin, J.C., Spini, F.: The cloth simulator for HTLC payment networks with introductory lightning network performance results. Information 9, 223 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Croman, K., et al.: On scaling decentralized blockchains. In: Clark, J., Meiklejohn, S., Ryan, P.Y.A., Wallach, D., Brenner, M., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9604, pp. 106–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53357-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Danezis, G., Goldberg, I.: Sphinx: a compact and provably secure mix format. In: 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Engelmann, F., Kopp, H., Kargl, F., Glaser, F., Weinhardt, C.: Towards an economic analysis of routing in payment channel networks. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Scalable and Resilient Infrastructures for Distributed Ledgers (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gervais, A., Karame, G.O., Wüst, K.., Glykantzis, V., Ritzdorf, H., Capkun, S.: On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gudgeon, L., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Roos, S., McCorry, P., Gervais, A.: Off the chain transactions. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, Sok (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herrera-Joancomartí, J., Navarro-Arribas, G., Ranchal-Pedrosa, A., Pérez-Solà, C., Garcia-Alfaro, J.: On the difficulty of hiding the balance of lightning network channels. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hinteregger, A., Haslhofer, B.: An empirical analysis of Monero cross-chain traceability. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) (Short paper) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalodner, H.A., Goldfeder, S., Chator, A., Möser, M., Narayanan, A.: BlockSci: design and applications of a blockchain analysis platform. arXiv:1709.02489 (2017)

  19. Kappos, G., Yousaf, H., Maller, M., Meiklejohn, S.: An empirical analysis of anonymity in Zcash. In: 27th \(USENIX\) Security Symposium 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khalil, R., Gervais, A.: Revive: rebalancing off-blockchain payment networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 439–453 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Khan, N., State, R.: Lightning network: a comparative review of transaction fees and data analysis. In: Prieto, J., Das, A.K., Ferretti, S., Pinto, A., Corchado, J.M. (eds.) BLOCKCHAIN 2019. AISC, vol. 1010, pp. 11–18. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23813-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Koshy, P., Koshy, D., McDaniel, P.: An analysis of anoymity in Bitcoin using P2P network traffic. In: International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar, A., Fischer, C., Tople, S., Saxena, P.: A traceability analysis of Monero’s blockchain. In: Foley, S.N., Gollmann, D., Snekkenes, E. (eds.) ESORICS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10493, pp. 153–173. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66399-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Malavolta, G., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Kate, A., Maffei, M., Ravi, S.: Concurrency and privacy with payment-channel networks. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Malavolta, G., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Schneidewind, C., Kate, A., Maffei, M.: Anonymous Multi-Hop Locks for blockchain scalability and interoperability. In: Proceedings of NDSS (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martinazzi, S.: The evolution of lightning network’s topology during its first year and the influence over its core values. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07307 (2019)

  27. Meiklejohn, S., et al.: A fistful of Bitcoins: characterizing payments among men with no names. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Möser, M., et al.: An empirical analysis of traceability in the Monero blockchain. In: Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Technical report, Manubot (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nisslmueller, U., Foerster, K.-T., Schmid, S., Decker, C.: Toward active and passive confidentiality attacks on cryptocurrency off-chain networks (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nowostawski, M., Tøn, J.: Evaluating methods for the identification of off-chain transactions in the Lightning Network. Appl. Sci. 9(12), 2519 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pérez-Solà, C., Ranchal-Pedrosa, A., Herrera-Joancomartí, J., Navarro-Arribas, G., Garcia-Alfaro, J.: LockDown: balance availability attack against lightning network channels. In: Bonneau, J., Heninger, N. (eds.) FC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12059, pp. 245–263. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51280-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Poon, J., Dryja, T.: The bitcoin lightning network: scalable off-chain instant payments (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quesnelle, J.: On the linkability of Zcash transactions (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Reid, F., Harrigan, M.: An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. In: Altshuler Y., Elovici Y., Cremers A., Aharony N., Pentland A. (eds.) Security and Privacy in Social Networks. Springer, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4139-7_10

  36. Reiter, M.K., Rubin, A.D.: Crowds: anonymity for web transactions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 1(1), 66–92 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rohrer, E., Malliaris, J., Tschorsch, F.: Discharged payment channels: quantifying the lightning network’s resilience to topology-based attacks. In: 2019 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), pp. 347–356. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Romiti, M., Victor, F., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Haslhofer, B., Maffei, M.: Cross-layer deanonymization methods in the lightning protocol (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ron, D., Shamir, A.: Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. In: Sadeghi, A.-R. (ed.) FC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7859, pp. 6–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Seres, I.A., Gulyás, L., Nagy, D.A., Burcsi, P.: Topological analysis of Bitcoin’s lightning network. arXiv:1901.04972 (2019)

  41. Spagnuolo, M., Maggi, F., Zanero, S.: BitIodine: extracting intelligence from the bitcoin network. In: Christin, N., Safavi-Naini, R. (eds.) FC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8437, pp. 457–468. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45472-5_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Tikhomirov, S., Moreno-Sanchez, P., Maffei, M.: A quantitative analysis of security, anonymity and scalability for the lightning network. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2020/303 (2020). https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/303

  43. Tikhomirov, S., Pickhardt, R., Biryukov, A., Nowostawski, M.: Probing channel balances in the lightning network (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tochner, S., Schmid, S., Zohar, A.: Hijacking routes in payment channel networks: a predictability tradeoff. arXiv:1909.06890 (2019)

  45. Werman, S., Zohar, A.: Avoiding deadlocks in payment channel networks. In: Garcia-Alfaro, J., Herrera-Joancomartí, J., Livraga, G., Rios, R. (eds.) DPM/CBT -2018. LNCS, vol. 11025, pp. 175–187. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00305-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Wright, M.K., Adler, M., Levine, B.N., Shields, C.: The predecessor attack: an analysis of a threat to anonymous communications systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 7(4), 489–522 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yen, J.Y.: An algorithm for finding shortest routes from all source nodes to a given destination in general networks. Q. Appl. Math. 27, 526–530 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu, Z., Au, M.H., Yu, J., Yang, R., Xu, Q., Lau, W.F.: New empirical traceability analysis of CryptoNote-style blockchains. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Y., Yang, D., Xue, G., CheaPay: an optimal algorithm for fee minimization in blockchain-based payment channel networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

George Kappos, Haaroon Yousaf and Sarah Meiklejohn are supported in part by EPSRC Grant EP/N028104/1, and in part by the EU H2020 TITANIUM project under grant agreement number 740558. Sanket Kanjalkar and Andrew Miller are supported by the NSF under agreement numbers 1801369 and 1943499. Sergi Delgado-Segura was partially funded by EPSRC Grant EP/N028104/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Kappos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 International Financial Cryptography Association

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kappos, G. et al. (2021). An Empirical Analysis of Privacy in the Lightning Network. In: Borisov, N., Diaz, C. (eds) Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12674. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64322-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64322-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64321-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64322-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics