iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94030-4_7
Trends on Sentiment Analysis over Social Networks: Pre-processing Ramifications, Stand-Alone Classifiers and Ensemble Averaging | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Trends on Sentiment Analysis over Social Networks: Pre-processing Ramifications, Stand-Alone Classifiers and Ensemble Averaging

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Machine Learning Paradigms

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 149 ))

Abstract

Technology advancements gave birth to social networks during the last decade. Many people tend to increasingly use them in order to share their personal opinion on current topics of their everyday life as well as express their emotions about situations in which they are interested. Hence, the emotions that are expressed in social networks can be positive, negative or neutral. To this direction, the analysis of people’s sentiments has drawn the attention of many scientists worldwide and offers a fertile ground for increasing research. Furthermore, a social network that is adopted by an ever growing percentage of people is Twitter. Twitter is an online news and social networking service where users post and interact with messages; such messages conceal people’s feelings and sentiments. Therefore, Twitter can be seen as a source of information and holds a vast amount of data that can be exploited for sentiment analysis research. In view of above, the purpose of this paper is to provide a guideline for the decision of optimal pre-processing techniques and classifiers for sentiment analysis over Twitter. In this context, three well-known Twitter datasets (OMD, HCR and STS-Gold) were used and a set of experiments was conducted. In particular, firstly, an extended comparison of sentiment polarity classification methods for Twitter text and the role of text preprocessing in sentiment analysis are discussed in depth. Secondly, four well-known learning-based classifiers (Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors and C4.5) have been evaluated based on confusion matrices. Thirdly, the most common ensemble methods (Bagging, Boosting, Stacking and Voting) are examined and compared to base classifiers’ results. Finally, a case study concerning the application of Twitter sentiment analysis in an e-learning context is presented. The main result of the utilization of the Twitter-based learning application is that the exploitation of students’ emotional states can be used to enhance adaptivity in the learning content as well as deliver recommendations about activities and provide personalized assistance. Concerning data pre-processing, the experimental results demonstrate that feature selection and representation can affect the classification performance positively. Regarding the selection of the proper classifier, the superiority of Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine, regardless of datasets, is proved, while the use of ensembles of multiple base classifiers can improve the accuracy of Twitter sentiment analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.comhttp://mywptips.com/top-microblogging-sites-list/.

  2. 2.

    https://about.twitter.com/companyhttp://www.internetlivestats.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentiment_analysis.

  4. 4.

    http://rali.iro.umontreal.ca/rali/sites/default/files/publis/SokolovaLapalme-JIPM09.pdf.

  5. 5.

    http://aimotion.blogspot.gr/2010/08/tools-for-machine-learning-performance.html.

  6. 6.

    http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/index.html.

  7. 7.

    http://snowball.tartarus.org/.

  8. 8.

    http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mccallum/bow/rainbow/.

  9. 9.

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-top-10-data-mining-or-machine-learning-algorithms.

References

  1. Yadav, S.K.: Sentiment analysis and classification: a survey. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Manag. Stud. 3(3), 113–121 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saif, H., Fernandez, M., He, Y., Alani, H.: SentiCircles for contextual and conceptual semantic sentiment analysis of twitter. In: 11th International Conference on Semantic Web: Trends and Challenges (ESWC 2014), Crete, Greece (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Medhat, W., Hassan, A., Korashy, H.: Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: a survey. Ain Shams Eng. J. 5(4), 1093–1113 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bravo-Marquez, F., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Meta-level sentiment models for big social data analysis. Knowl.-Based Syst. 69(1), 86–99 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Martínez-Cámara, E., Martín-Valdivia, M.T., Ureña-López, L.A., Montejo-Ráez, A.R.: Sentiment analysis in twitter. Nat. Lang. Eng. 20(1), 1–28 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smailović, J., Grčar, M., Lavrač, N., Žnidaršič, M.: Stream-based active learning for sentiment analysis in the financial domain. Inf. Sci. 285(1), 181–203 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mostafa, M.M.: More than words: social networks’ text mining for consumer brand sentiments. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(10), 4241–4251 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheong, M., Lee, V.C.S.: A microblogging-based approach to terrorism informatics: exploration and chronicling civilian sentiment and response to terrorism events via twitter. Inf. Syst. Front. 13(1), 45–59 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ortigosa, A., Martín, J.M., Carro, R.M.: Sentiment analysis in facebook and its application to e-learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 31(1), 527–541 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, L., Ghosh, R., Dekhil, M., Hsu, M., Liu, B.: Combining lexicon-based and learning-based methods for twitter sentiment analysis. HP Laboratories Technical Report (89) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haddi, E., Liu, X., Shi, Y.: The role of text pre-processing in sentiment analysis. Proc. Comput. Sci. 17, 26–32 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krouska, A., Troussas, C., Virvou, M.: The effect of preprocessing techniques on Twitter sentiment analysis. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Virvou, M.: Evaluation of ensemble-based sentiment classifiers for Twitter data. In: 2016 7th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shamma, D., Kennedy, L., Churchill, E.: Tweet the Debates: Understanding Community Annotation of Uncollected Sources. ACM Multimedia, ACM (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Speriosu, M., Sudan, N., Upadhyay, N., Baldridge, J.: Twitter polarity classification with label propagation over lexical links and the follower graph. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Unsupervised Methods in NLP, Edinburgh, Scotland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saif, H., Fernez, M., He, Y., Alani, H.: Evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis: a survey and a new dataset, the STS-Gold. In: 1st International Workshop on Emotion and Sentiment in Social and Expressive Media: Approaches and Perspectives from AI (ESSEM 2013), Turin, Italy (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bravo-Marquez, F., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Combining strengths, emotions and polarities for boosting twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining, WISDOM 2013 (2013). Da Silva, N.F., Hruschka, E.R., Hruschka, E.R., Jr.: Tweet sentiment analysis with classifier ensembles. Decis. Support Syst. 66, 170–179 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krouska, A., Troussas, C., Virvou, M.: Comparative evaluation of algorithms for sentiment analysis over social networking services. J. Univ. Comput. Sci. 23(8), 755–768 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akrivi Krouska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Virvou, M. (2019). Trends on Sentiment Analysis over Social Networks: Pre-processing Ramifications, Stand-Alone Classifiers and Ensemble Averaging. In: Tsihrintzis, G., Sotiropoulos, D., Jain, L. (eds) Machine Learning Paradigms. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 149 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94030-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics