Abstract
Project Portfolio Management (PPM) focus on the integration and alignment of projects with the business operation in order to achieve most value and cost-efficiency for the investment in projects. PPM is often a challenge and especially so for improvement projects where PPM is considerably underdeveloped. In this paper, we present an approach that combines the ImprovAbility model and assessment with a version of a CMMI assessment developed by the Danish company Whitebox. This approach was developed in the world-leading Wind Turbine Company Vestas. The paper presents and discusses this new way of evaluating a portfolio of improvement projects and combine this evaluation with the effect they have on the CMMI maturity level. Further, the paper demonstrates how the combination of a strong senior management requirement for improved maturity and the focus on getting the most value out of PPM made it possible for Vestas to become “better at getting better”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levine, H.A.: Project Portfolio Management. San Francisco (2005)
Daniel, E.M., Ward, J.M., Franken, A.: A dynamic capabilities perspective of IS project portfolio management. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23(2), 95–111 (2014)
Hunt, R., et al.: Project portfolio management for product innovation. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 25(1), 24–38 (2008)
PMI: The Standard for Portfolio Management, 3rd edn. Project Management Institute (2013)
Blichfeldt, B.S., Eskerod, P.: Project portfolio management–there’s more to it than what management enacts. Int. J. Project Manage. 26(4), 357–365 (2008)
Martinsuo, M.: Project portfolio management in practice and in context. Int. J. Project Manage. 31(6), 794–803 (2013)
Kaiser, M.G., El Arbi, F., Ahlemann, F.: Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment. Int. J. Project Manage. 33(1), 126–139 (2015)
Beringer, C., Jonas, D., Kock, A.: Behavior of internal stakeholders in project portfolio management and its impact on success. Int. J. Project Manage. 31(6), 830–846 (2013)
ISO: ISO/IEC/TR 33014, in Information technology – Process assessment – Guide for process improvement, Geneva, Switzerland (2013)
CMMI: CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3, Improving processes for developing better products and services. No. CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033. Software Engineering Institute (2010)
Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (eds.) ImprovAbility: Success with process improvement. DELTA, Hørsholm, (2013)
ISO/IEC_33001: Information technology – Process assessment – Concepts and terminology. Geneva, Switzerland. (the first of the ISO/IEC 330xx serie of standards) (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pries-Heje, J., Jakobsen, P.M., Korsaa, M., Johansen, J. (2017). Improving Project Portfolio Management (PPM) for Improvement Projects. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O'Connor, R., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 748. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64217-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64218-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)