Abstract
A novel approach for introducing adaptivity to user satisfaction into dialogue management is presented in this work. In general, rendering the dialogue adaptive to user satisfaction enables the dialogue system to improve the course of the dialogue or to handle problematic situations better. In this contribution, the theoretical aspects of rendering the dialogue cycle adaptive are outlined. Furthermore, a detailed description of how an existing dialogue management component is extended to adapting to user satisfaction is described. The approach is validated by presenting an actual implementation. For a proof-of-concept, the resulting dialogue manager is applied in an experiment comparing different confirmation strategies. Having a simple dialogue, the adaptive strategy performs successful and as good as the best strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Feature list: UTD, RePrompt?, DD, MeanASRConfidence, #ASRSuccess, %ASRSuccess, #ASRRejections, %ASRRejections, #TimeOutPrompts, %TimeOutPrompts, {Mean}ASRConfidence, {#}ASRSuccess, {#}ASRRejections, {#}RePrompts, {#}SystemQuestions.
References
Fraser NM (1994) The sundial speech understanding and dialogue project: results and implications for translation. In: Aslib proceedings, vol 46. MCB UP Ltd, pp 141–148
Gnjatović M, Rösner D (2008) Adaptive dialogue management in the nimitek prototype system. In: PIT ’08: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE tutorial and research workshop on perception and interactive technologies for speech-based systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 14–25. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69369-7_3
Heinroth T, Denich D, Schmitt A (2010) Owlspeak—adaptive spoken dialogue within intelligent environments. In: IEEE PerCom workshop proceedings. Presented as part of SmartE workshop
Hone KS, Graham R (2000) Towards a tool for the subjective assessment of speech system interfaces (sassi). Nat Lang Eng 6(3–4):287–303. doi:10.1017/s1351324900002497
Larsson S, Traum DR (2000) Information state and dialogue management in the trindi dialogue move engine. Nat Lang Eng Spec Issue 6:323–340. http://www.ling.gu.se/~sl/nle.ps
Litman D, Pan S (2002) Designing and evaluating an adaptive spoken dialogue system. User Model User-Adap Inter 12(2–3):111–137. doi:10.1023/a:1015036910358
Nothdurft F, Honold F, Kurzok P (2012) Using explanations for runtime dialogue adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on multimodal interaction. ACM, pp 63–64
Oshry M, Auburn R, Baggia P, Bodell M, Burke D, Burnett D, Candell E, Carter J, Mcglashan S, Lee A, Porter B, Rehor K (2007) Voice extensible markup language (voicexml) version 2.1. Tech. rep. W3C—Voice Browser Working Group
Raux A, Bohus D, Langner B, Black AW, Eskenazi M (2006) Doing research on a deployed spoken dialogue system: one year of let’s go! experience. In: Proceedings of the international conference on speech and language processing (ICSLP)
Schmitt A, Schatz B, Minker W (2011) Modeling and predicting quality in spoken human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 conference. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, pp 173–184
Schmitt A, Ultes S, Minker W (2012) A parameterized and annotated spoken dialog corpus of the cmu let’s go bus information system. In: International conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC), pp 3369–337
Ultes S, Heinroth T, Schmitt A, Minker W (2011) A theoretical framework for a user-centered spoken dialog manager. In: Proceedings of the paralinguistic information and its integration in spoken dialogue systems workshop. Springer, pp 241–246
Ultes S, Minker W (2014) Managing adaptive spoken dialogue for intelligent environments. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 6(5):523–539. doi:10.3233/ais-140275
Ultes S, Schmitt A, Minker W (2012) Towards quality-adaptive spoken dialogue management. In: NAACL-HLT Workshop on future directions and needs in the spoken dialog community: tools and data (SDCTD 2012). Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, pp 49–52. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W12-1819
Ultes S, Schmitt A, Minker W (2013) On quality ratings for spoken dialogue systems—experts vs. users. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 569–578
Vapnik VN (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ultes, S., Dikme, H., Minker, W. (2016). Dialogue Management for User-Centered Adaptive Dialogue. In: Rudnicky, A., Raux, A., Lane, I., Misu, T. (eds) Situated Dialog in Speech-Based Human-Computer Interaction. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21834-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21834-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21833-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21834-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)