iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10450-3_22
Differences and Incongruences in Land Take Monitoring Techniques | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Differences and Incongruences in Land Take Monitoring Techniques

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 (ICCSA 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13376))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 610 Accesses

Abstract

The new European standards and directives on land take raise critical issues concerning the techniques for measuring and monitoring the phenomenon in order to achieve the targets fixed. The directive “No Net Land Take by 2050”, makes it necessary to homogenize both the terminology used to define land take or consumption and the standardization of a computational methodology for its quantification. In order to achieve the goals, set by the EU regarding land take and soil sealing, it is necessary for EU member states to produce comparable data. It is essential to use the same data sources with standardized coding and to share the same meaning of the concept of land take. Therefore, with the aim of highlighting the criticalities and inconsistencies arising from the use of different techniques and datasets for monitoring land take, we will analyze, first, different definitions of land take derived from institutional sources including the European Environment Agency (EEA); then to each definition we will associate the corresponding land cover classes derived from the Copernicus Corine Land Cover (CLC) project. For the quantitative analysis we will use continuous and discontinuous datasets (raster and vectors) whose results will be compared with the data of the annual report on land take of the Superior Institute for environmental protection and research of Italy (ISPRA 2020).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Couch, C., Leontidou, L., Petschel-Held, G.: Urban sprawl in Europe: landscapes, land-use change & policy. Plan. Pract. Res. 25(2), 273–274 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. EEA: Land and soil in Europe (2019). https://doi.org/10.2800/779710

  3. Pilogallo, A., Saganeiti, L., Scorza, F., Murgante, B.: Assessing the impact of land use changes on ecosystem services value. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12253, pp. 606–616. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58814-4_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Freilich, R.H., Peshoff, B.G.: The social costs of sprawl. Urban Lawyer 29, 183–198 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/27895056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Manganelli, B., Murgante, B., Saganeiti, L.: The social cost of urban sprinkling. Sustainability 12, 2236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beniamino, M., et al.: A methodological proposal to evaluate the health hazard scenario from COVID-19 in Italy. Environ. Res. 209, 112873 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVRES.2022.112873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bencardino, M.: Land take and urban sprawl: drivers e contrasting policies (2015). https://doi.org/10.13128/BSGI.V8I2.339

  8. Anderegg, W.R.L., Goldsmith, G.R.: Public interest in climate change over the past decade and the effects of the ‘climategate’ media event. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 054005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, L.A.: The city in 2050: a kaleidoscopic perspective. Appl. Geogr. 49, 4–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cobbinah, P.B., Aboagye, H.N.: A Ghanaian twist to urban sprawl. Land Use Policy 61, 231–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: World Urbanization Prospects The 2018 Revision (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Union: FUTURE BRIEF: No net land take by 2050? (2016). https://doi.org/10.2779/537195

  13. Piano Nazionale di ripresa e resilienza #NextGenerationITALIA (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munafò, M.: Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. Edizione 2020. Report SNPA, no. 15, 224 (2020). 978-88-448-0964-5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Munafò, M. (a cura di): Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. Edizione 2019. Report SNPA, 08/19 (2019). 978-88-448-0964-5

    Google Scholar 

  16. European Commission: Guidelines on best practice to limit, mitigate or compensate soil sealing (2012). https://doi.org/10.2779/75498

  17. Brueckner, J.K.: Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 23, 160–171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/016001700761012710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nechyba, T.J., Walsh, R.P.: Urban sprawl. J. Econ. Perspect. 18, 177–200 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042632681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Romano, B., Zullo, F., Fiorini, L., Ciabò, S., Marucci, A.: Sprinkling: an approach to describe urbanization dynamics in Italy. Sustainability 9, 97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saganeiti, L., Favale, A., Pilogallo, A., Scorza, F., Murgante, B.: Assessing urban fragmentation at regional scale using sprinkling indexes. Sustainability 10, 3274 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saganeiti, L., Mustafa, A., Teller, J., Murgante, B.: Modeling urban sprinkling with cellular automata. Sustain. Cities Soc. 65, 102586 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Romano, B., Fiorini, L., Zullo, F., Marucci, A.: Urban growth control DSS techniques for de-sprinkling process in Italy. Sustainability 9, 1852 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonzalez, G.A.: Urban sprawl, global warming and the limits of ecological modernisation. Environ. Politics 14, 344–362 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/0964410500087558

  24. Johnson, M.P.: Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Sp. 33, 717–735 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1068/a3327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scorza, F., Saganeiti, L., Pilogallo, A., Murgante, B.: Ghost planning: the inefficiency of energy sector policies in a low population density region. Arch. di Stud. Urbani e Reg. 34–55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3280/ASUR2020-127-S1003

  26. Romano, B., Zullo, F., Marucci, A., Fiorini, L.: Vintage urban planning in Italy: land management with the tools of the mid-twentieth century. Sustainability 10, 4125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10114125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. European Environment Agency: EEA Glossary—European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/help/glossary/eea-glossary. Accessed 23 Nov 2020

  28. Munafò, M. (a cura di): Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici. Edizione 2018. ISPRA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feranec, J., Soukup, T., Hazeu, G., Jaffrain, G.: Detailed CLC data: member states with CLC level 4/level 5 and (semi-) automated solutions. In: European Landscape Dynamics. CORINE L. Cover Data, pp. 307–334 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315372860-41

  30. Kosztra, B., Büttner, G., Hazeu, G., Arnold, S.: Updated CLC illustrated nomenclature guidelines. Service Contract No 3436/R0-Copernicus/EEA.57441 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering (LISUT), School of Engineering, University of Basilicata, Viale dell’ateneo Lucano 10, 85100, Potenza, Italy

    Barbara Lopatriello & Beniamino Murgante

  2. Department of Civil, Building-Architecture and Environmental Engineering, University of L’Aquila, Via G. Gronchi, 18, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy

    Lucia Saganeiti

Authors
  1. Barbara Lopatriello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucia Saganeiti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beniamino Murgante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucia Saganeiti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Universidad de Málaga, Malaga, Spain

    Eligius M. T. Hendrix

  4. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  5. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lopatriello, B., Saganeiti, L., Murgante, B. (2022). Differences and Incongruences in Land Take Monitoring Techniques. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Hendrix, E.M.T., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022. ICCSA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13376. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10450-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10450-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10449-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10450-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation