iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_20
Text Embeddings for Retrieval from a Large Knowledge Base | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Text Embeddings for Retrieval from a Large Knowledge Base

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 385))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Text embedding representing natural language documents in a semantic vector space can be used for document retrieval using nearest neighbor lookup. In order to study the feasibility of neural models specialized for retrieval in a semantically meaningful way, we suggest the use of the Stanford Question Answering Dataset (SQuAD) in an open-domain question answering context, where the first task is to find paragraphs useful for answering a given question. First, we compare the quality of various text-embedding methods on the performance of retrieval and give an extensive empirical comparison on the performance of various non-augmented base embedding with, and without IDF weighting. Our main results are that by training deep residual neural models, specifically for retrieval purposes, can yield significant gains when it is used to augment existing embeddings. We also establish that deeper models are superior to this task. The best base baseline embeddings augmented by our learned neural approach improves the top-1 paragraph recall of the system by \(14\%\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., Janvin, C.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1137–1155 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., Mikolov, T.: Enriching word vectors with subword information. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 5, 135–146 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cao, Q., Ying, Y., Li, P.: Similarity metric learning for face recognition. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2408–2415 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cer, D., et al.: Universal sentence encoder (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chechik, G., Sharma, V., Shalit, U., Bengio, S.: Large scale online learning of image similarity through ranking. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 1109–1135 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chelba, C., et al.: One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling. Technical report (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, D., Fisch, A., Weston, J., Bordes, A.: Reading wikipedia to answer open-domain questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00051 (2017)

  8. Chopra, S., Hadsell, R., LeCun, Y.: Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification, vol. 1, pp. 539–546 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conneau, A., Kiela, D., Schwenk, H., Barrault, L., Bordes, A.: Supervised learning of universal sentence representations from natural language inference data. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 670–680 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hadsell, R., Chopra, S., LeCun, Y.: Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping. In: CVPR 2006, pp. 1735–1742 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hill, F., Cho, K., Korhonen, A.: Learning distributed representations of sentences from unlabelled data. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1367–1377 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iyyer, M., Manjunatha, V., Boyd-Graber, J.L., III, H.D.: Deep unordered composition rivals syntactic methods for text classification. In: ACL, no. 1, pp. 1681–1691 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  16. Kiros, R., et al.: Skip-thought vectors. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, pp. 3294–3302 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Le, Q.V., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: ICML, vol. 32, pp. 1188–1196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lowe, D.G.: Similarity metric learning for a variable-kernel classifier. Neural Comput. 7(1), 72–85 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 26, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pagliardini, M., Gupta, P., Jaggi, M.: Unsupervised learning of sentence embeddings using compositional n-gram features. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (Long Papers), pp. 528–540 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perone, C.S., Silveira, R., Paula, T.S.: Evaluation of sentence embeddings in downstream and linguistic probing tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.06259 (2018)

  23. Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., Zettlemoyer, L.: Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1 (Long Papers), pp. 2227–2237 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., Liang, P.: Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250 (2016)

  25. Rücklé, A., Eger, S., Peyrard, M., Gurevych, I.: Concatenated p-mean word embeddings as universal cross-lingual sentence representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.01400 (2018)

  26. Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., Philbin, J.: Facenet: a unified embedding for face recognition and clustering, pp. 815–823 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sohn, K.: Improved deep metric learning with multi-class n-pair loss objective. In: NIPS 2016, pp. 1857–1865 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sun, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Deep learning face representation by joint identification-verification, pp. 1988–1996 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., Wolf, L.: Deepface: closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. In: CVPR 2014, pp. 1701–1708 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, J., et al.: Learning fine-grained image similarity with deep ranking, pp. 1386–1393 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang, J., Zhou, F., Wen, S., Liu, X., Lin, Y.: Deep metric learning with angular loss (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weinberger, K.Q., Saul, L.K.: Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification, vol. 10, pp. 207–244 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Xing, E.P., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I., Russell, S.: Distance metric learning, with application to clustering with side-information. In: NIPS 2002, pp. 521–528 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yu, A.W., et al.: Qanet: combining local convolution with global self-attention for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09541 (2018)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study used the Google Cloud Computing Platform (GCP) which is supported by Google AI research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tolgahan Cakaloglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cakaloglu, T., Szegedy, C., Xu, X. (2020). Text Embeddings for Retrieval from a Large Knowledge Base. In: Dalpiaz, F., Zdravkovic, J., Loucopoulos, P. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 385. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50316-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50315-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50316-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics