iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_7
An Architecture and Data Model to Process Multimodal Evidence of Learning | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

An Architecture and Data Model to Process Multimodal Evidence of Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2019 (ICWL 2019)

Abstract

In learning situations that do not occur exclusively online, the analysis of multimodal evidence can help multiple stakeholders to better understand the learning process and the environment where it occurs. However, Multimodal Learning Analytics (MMLA) solutions are often not directly applicable outside the specific data gathering setup and conditions they were developed for. This paper focuses specifically on authentic situations where MMLA solutions are used by multiple stakeholders (e.g., teachers and researchers). In this paper, we propose an architecture to process multimodal evidence of learning taking into account the situation’s contextual information. Our adapter-based architecture supports the preparation, organisation, and fusion of multimodal evidence, and is designed to be reusable in different learning situations. Moreover, to structure and organise such contextual information, a data model is proposed. Finally, to evaluate the architecture and the data model, we apply them to four authentic learning situations where multimodal learning data was collected collaboratively by teachers and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not an UML-based data model but it is a sample data model.

  2. 2.

    Observational form available at http://tiny.cc/adek5y.

  3. 3.

    Reference implementation source code available at http://tiny.cc/7oek5y.

  4. 4.

    Example Graasp log available at http://tiny.cc/avek5y.

  5. 5.

    Example observation data available at http://tiny.cc/1wek5y.

  6. 6.

    A sample of the configuration file is available at http://tiny.cc/ead95y.

References

  1. Bano, M., Zowghi, D.: User involvement in software development and system success: a systematic literature review. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 125–130. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buschmann, F., Henney, K., Schmidt, D.C.: Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture, on Patterns and Pattern Languages, vol. 5. Wiley, Hoboken (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chatti, M.A., et al.: Learning analytics: challenges and future research directions. eleed 10(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L., Feng, G., Leong, C.W., Joe, J., Kitchen, C., Lee, C.M.: Designing an automated assessment of public speaking skills using multimodal cues. J. Learn. Anal. 3(2), 261–281 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Mitri, D., Schneider, J., Klemke, R., Specht, M., Drachsler, H.: Read between the lines: an annotation tool for multimodal data for learning. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 51–60. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farrell, T., Mikroyannidis, A., Alani, H.: “We’re seeking relevance”: qualitative perspectives on the impact of learning analytics on teaching and learning. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10474, pp. 397–402. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Grafsgaard, J., Wiggins, J., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E., Lester, J.: Predicting learning and affect from multimodal data streams in task-oriented tutorial dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hernández-García, Á., Conde, M.Á.: Dealing with complexity: educational data and tools for learning analytics. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 263–268. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krafzig, D., Banke, K., Slama, D.: Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices. Prentice Hall Professional, Upper Saddle River (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, H.G., Mork, P.: From data to decisions: a value chain for big data. IT Prof. 15(1), 57–59 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2013.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ochoa, X.: Multimodal learning analytics. In: Handbook of Learning Analytics, pp. 129–141 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ochoa, X., Worsley, M.: Augmenting learning analytics with multimodal sensory data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(2), 213–219 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prieto, L.P., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Martínez-Maldonado, R., Dimitriadis, Y., Gašević, D.: Orchestrating learning analytics (OrLA): supporting inter-stakeholder communication about adoption of learning analytics at the classroom level. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 4(35) (2019). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4314

  14. Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Prieto, L.P., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.: The teacher in the loop: customizing multimodal learning analytics for blended learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 417–426. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rodriguez Triana, M.J., et al.: Monitoring, awareness and reflection in blended technology enhanced learning: a systematic review. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 9(2–3), 126–150 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider, J., Börner, D., Van Rosmalen, P., Specht, M.: Augmenting the senses: a review on sensor-based learning support. Sensors 15(2), 4097–4133 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Limbu, B., Drachsler, H.: Multimodal learning hub: a tool for capturing customizable multimodal learning experiences. In: Pammer-Schindler, V., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Drachsler, H., Elferink, R., Scheffel, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2018. LNCS, vol. 11082, pp. 45–58. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Shankar, S.K., Prieto, L.P., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Ruiz-Calleja, A.: A review of multimodal learning analytics architectures. In: 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 212–214. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tarr, P., Ossher, H., Harrison, W., Sutton, S.M.: N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns. In: Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering (IEEE Cat. No. 99CB37002), pp. 107–119. IEEE (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Worsley, M.: Multimodal learning analytics as a tool for bridging learning theory and complex learning behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Workshop on Multimodal Learning Analytics Workshop and Grand Challenge, pp. 1–4. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Worsley, M., Blikstein, P.: Leveraging multimodal learning analytics to differentiate student learning strategies. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 360–367. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially funded by the European Union via the European Regional Development Fund and in the context of CEITER and Next-Lab (Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, grant agreements no. 669074 and 731685).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shashi Kant Shankar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shankar, S.K., Ruiz-Calleja, A., Prieto, L.P., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Chejara, P. (2019). An Architecture and Data Model to Process Multimodal Evidence of Learning. In: Herzog, M., Kubincová, Z., Han, P., Temperini, M. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2019. ICWL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11841. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35758-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35757-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35758-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics