iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://unpaywall.org/10.1007/3-540-45816-6_34
Property-Based Semantic Reconciliation of Heterogeneous Information Sources | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Property-Based Semantic Reconciliation of Heterogeneous Information Sources

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling — ER 2002 (ER 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2503))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Integrating information from diverse sources is of great importance in the database area. The main difficulty in information integration is reconciling data semantics. Common approaches to semantic reconciliation are based on first identifying similar entity types in various sources, and then reconciling entity type properties (attributes and relationships). Such approaches assume all instances to be reconciled belong to well-defined types. We suggest an alternative approach based on two fundamental principles. First, reconciliation does not require that instances be assigned to specific types. Instead, sources can be reconciled by analyzing similarities of properties. Second, properties that appear different may be manifestations of a higher-level property that has the same meaning across sources. We present the fundamental ideas underlying our approach, analyze its potential advantages, suggest how the approach can be formalized, demonstrate with examples the feasibility of using it for semantic reconciliation, and suggest directions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batini, C, M. Lenzerini, and S.B. Navathe, “A Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Database Schema Integration,” ACM Computing Surveys, 18(4), 1986, 323–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunge, M., Treatise on Basic Philosophy (Volume 3), Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, Boston: Reidel, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bunge, M., Treatise on Basic Philosophy (Volume 4), Ontology II: A World of Systems, Boston: Reidel, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castano, S., V. De Antonellis, M. Fugini, and B. Pernici (1999), “Conceptual Schema Analysis: Techniques and Applications,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 23(3), 286–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castano, S., V. De Antonellis, and S. De Capitani di Vimercati (2001), “Global Viewing of Heterogeneous Data Sources,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(2), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, C, G. Cormack, and F. Burkowski (1995), “Schema-Independent Retrieval from Heterogeneous Structured Text,” in Fourth Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clifton, C, E. Housman, and A. Rosenthal (1997), “Experience with a Combined Approach to Attribute-Matching Across Heterogeneous Databases,” Data Mining and Reverse Engineering. Proceedings ofDS-7, IFIP 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, W. (1998), “Integration of Heterogeneous Databases Without Common Domains Using Queries Based on Textual Similarity,” Proceedings of the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’98), Seattle, WA, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goble, C, S. Bechhofer, L. Carr, D. De Roure, and W. Hall (2001), “Conceptual Open Hypermedia = The Semantic Web?” Proceedings of the 2001 Semantic Web Workshop, Hong Kong, China, 7 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hulgeri, A., G. Bhalotia, C. Nakhe, and S. Chakrabarti (2001), “Keyword Search in Databases,” IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 24(3), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J.-O. and D.-K. Baik (1999), “SemQL: A Semantic Query Language for Multidatabase Systems,” Proceedings of the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’99), Kansas City, MO, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Litwin, W., L. Mark, and N. Roussopoulos (1990), “Interoperability of Multiple Autonomous Databases,” ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maedche, A. and S. Staab (2001), “Learning Ontologies for the Semantic Web,” Proceedings of the 2001 Semantic Web Workshop, Hong Kong, China, 10 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, R., “Using Schematically Heterogeneous Structures,” Proceedings SIGMOD’98, Seattle, WA, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Naiman, C. and A. Ouksel, “A Classification of Semantic Conflicts in Heterogeneous Information Systems,” Journal of Organizational Computing, 5(2), 1995, 167–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paepcke, A., C.-C. Chang, H. Garcia-Molina, and T. Winograd (1998), “Interoperability for Digital Libraries Worldwide,” Communications of the ACM, 41(4), 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parent, C, S. Spaccapietra (1998), “Database Integration: an Overview of Issues and Approaches,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 41, no 5, pp. 166–178, May 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons, J. and Y. Wand, (2000), “Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Classes in Information Modeling,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 25(2), 228–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qian, X. (1993), “Semantic Interoperation Via Intelligent Mediation,” Proceedings of the 1993 International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, 228–231.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reddy, M.P., B.E. Prasad, P.G. Reddy, and A. Gupta, “A Methodology for Integration of Heterogeneous Databases,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 6(6), 1994, 920–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sciore, E., M. Siegel, and A. Rosenthal (1994), “Using Semantic Values to Facilitate Interoperability Among Heterogeneous Information Systems,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19(2), 254–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, K. and L. Obrst, “Unpacking the Semantics of Source and Usage to Perform Semantic Reconciliation in Large-Scale Information Systems,” ACM SIGMOD Record, 28(1), 1999, 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Toivonen, S. (2001), “Using RDF(S) to Provide Multiple Views into a Single Ontology,” Proceedings of the 2001 Semantic Web Workshop, Hongkong, China, 6 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wand, Y., “A Proposal for a Formal Model of Objects,” in W. Kim (ed.) and F. Lochovsky (eds.), Object-oriented Concepts, Databases and Applications, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1989, 537–559.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wand, Y., V. Storey, and R. Weber, “An Ontological Analysis of the relationship Construct in Conceptual Modelling”, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, Vol. 24, No. 4, December 1999, pp. 494–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wand, Y. and Weber, R., “An Ontological Model of an Information System,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 16(11), November 1990, 1282–1292.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wand, Y. and Weber, R., “On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars,” Journal of Information Systems, 1993, 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wand, Y. and Weber, R., “Towards a Theory of Deep Structure of Information Systems,” Journal of Information Systems, 1995, 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Parsons, J., Wand, Y. (2002). Property-Based Semantic Reconciliation of Heterogeneous Information Sources. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds) Conceptual Modeling — ER 2002. ER 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2503. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45816-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45816-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44277-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45816-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics