Occupational noise exposure of operators of heavy trucks
- PMID: 9530807
- DOI: 10.1080/15428119891010479
Occupational noise exposure of operators of heavy trucks
Abstract
Over 400 measurements were taken across Canada to assess the noise exposure of truck operators. The exposure of the driver was evaluated using both 3-dB (Leq) and 5-dB (L5dB) exchange rates. Driving with windows closed and radio not operating resulted in the lowest exposure. The drivers' Leq ranged from 78 to 89 dBA, with a mean of 82.7 dBA; operating the radio increased the mean by 2.8 dB; driving with the driver's side window open increased the mean exposure by 1.3 dB; and driving with the window open and operating the radio resulted in an increase of 3.9 dB. Trucks with cabs mounted over the engine appear to be quieter than standard trucks by about 2.6 dB. Operations on four-lane highways are 1.6 dB noisier than on two-lane highways, most likely as a result of higher speeds on the former. Long haul (city-to-city) operations on hilly terrain appear to be quieter than on flat terrain by about 2.2 dB, again probably indicating the strong effect of speed. Regression analysis was used to obtain relationships between a number of variables such as Leq and L5dB, etc. These measurements indicate that the exposure of a driver is almost certain to exceed the current threshold limit value for noise (85 dBA for 8 hours with a 3-dB exchange rate) when driving with the radio on and the driver's side window open. Comparable numbers in terms of L5dB are also reported.
Similar articles
-
Noise induced hearing loss risk assessment in truck drivers.Noise Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;12(46):49-55. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.59999. Noise Health. 2010. PMID: 20160390
-
Noise exposure in the rural setting.Laryngoscope. 1993 Mar;103(3):258-62. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199303000-00004. Laryngoscope. 1993. PMID: 8441312
-
Noise exposure of truck drivers: a comparative study.Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Jun;57(6):564-6. doi: 10.1080/15428119691015269. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996. PMID: 8651075
-
Measurement of noise and vibration in Canadian forces armoured vehicles.Ind Health. 2007 Apr;45(2):318-27. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.45.318. Ind Health. 2007. PMID: 17485877
-
Occupational hearing conservation.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;24(2):403-14. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1991. PMID: 1857619 Review.
Cited by
-
Noise Level inside Sri Lanka Transport Board Buses and Hearing Impairment of Long- and Short-Distance Bus Drivers of Ampara and Batticaloa Districts, Sri Lanka.Indian J Community Med. 2022 Apr-Jun;47(2):280-284. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_768_21. Epub 2022 Jul 11. Indian J Community Med. 2022. PMID: 36034247 Free PMC article.
-
A community noise survey in Southwest Detroit and the value of supplemental metrics for truck noise.Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111064. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111064. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Environ Res. 2021. PMID: 33857459 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Occupational Noise Exposure among Groundskeepers in North Carolina Public Universities.Environ Health Insights. 2016 Jun 13;10:83-92. doi: 10.4137/EHI.S39682. eCollection 2016. Environ Health Insights. 2016. PMID: 27330303 Free PMC article.
-
Noise exposure and hearing loss among sand and gravel miners.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Aug;1(8):532-41. doi: 10.1080/15459620490476503. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004. PMID: 15238306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous