iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38378136
Molecular assembly indices of mineral heteropolyanions: some abiotic molecules are as complex as large biomolecules - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb;21(211):20230632.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0632. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

Molecular assembly indices of mineral heteropolyanions: some abiotic molecules are as complex as large biomolecules

Affiliations

Molecular assembly indices of mineral heteropolyanions: some abiotic molecules are as complex as large biomolecules

Robert M Hazen et al. J R Soc Interface. 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Molecular assembly indices, which measure the number of unique sequential steps theoretically required to construct a three-dimensional molecule from its constituent atomic bonds, have been proposed as potential biosignatures. A central hypothesis of assembly theory is that any molecule with an assembly index ≥15 found in significant local concentrations represents an unambiguous sign of life. We show that abiotic molecule-like heteropolyanions, which assemble in aqueous solution as precursors to some mineral crystals, range in molecular assembly indices from 2 for H2CO3 or Si(OH)4 groups to as large as 21 for the most complex known molecule-like subunits in the rare minerals ewingite and ilmajokite. Therefore, values of molecular assembly indices ≥15 do not represent unambiguous biosignatures.

Keywords: Titan; assembly theory; heteropolyanion; mineral evolution; molecular complexity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The crystal structure of the tourmaline group mineral fluor-uvite [14] projected approximately parallel to the c axis (a) and the (Mg3B3Si6O36)33− island (b). In fluor-uvite: X = Ca, Y = Mg, Z = Al, T = Si.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The ‘exact’ MA index assembly pathway for the fluor-uvite cluster shown in figure 1b: the basic element of the silicate ring (a); three basic elements that include dimeric silicate unit (b), MgO bond (c) and BO3 triangle (d); the linkage of the three basic elements shown in (b) into a complex unit (e); the resulting fluor-uvite island centred by additional anion (f; the outlines of the subunits shown in (e) are indicated by the dashed lines). The value of MA index is written below each structure.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) The eudialyte [Na15Ca6Fe3Zr3Si(Si25O73)(O,OH,H2O)3(Cl,OH)2] structure [22] features sodium atoms (yellow spheres), Ca polyhedra (orange), Fe polyhedra (grey), Zr octahedra (dark blue), Si–Nb polyhedra (light blue), Si tetrahedra (red), and Cl atoms (green spheres). Hydrogen atoms are not shown. (b) Eudialyte incorporates at least two different molecule-like sub-assemblies. One example, shown here, includes an edge-sharing six-member ring of calcium octahedra (in orange), with three-member (Si3O9) rings (red) above and below and six additional (Si3O10) three-tetrahedron segments around the periphery to form a [Ca6(Si3O9)2(Si3O10)6]30− cluster. We also focus on the strongly bonded sandwich-like subunit of (ZrO6) octahedra between two (Si9O27) rings [(Si9O27)2(ZrO4)6]60−, as represented by adjacent red and dark blue polyhedra in (a). (From Johnson & Grice [22], used with permission from the Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology.)
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(a) The [(As3+V4+,5+12As5+6)O51] heteropolyanionic cluster found in several mineral species is a strongly bonded subunit of a more extensive structure. Arsenic polyhedra are shown in red, while vanadium polyhedra are shown in orange [24]. (b) The crystal structure of vanarsite [NaCa12(As3+V4+2V5+10As5+6O51)2·78H2O] reveals weakly bonded interstitial regions with Na–O, Ca–O, and hydrogen bonding between polyanionic clusters [24]. Sodium and calcium atoms are shown in blue; larger and smaller white spheres represent oxygen and hydrogen atoms, respectively. (From Kampf et al. [24], used with permission from the Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology.)
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Polyhedral representation of the [CuCa2U6+4O12(CO3)12]18− polyoxometalate subunit, which is a central feature of the complex structure of paddlewheelite [MgCa5Cu2(UO2)4(CO3)12(H2O)33]. After Olds et al. [19].
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Portions of the complex ewingite structure [Mg8Ca8(UO2)24(CO3)30O4(OH)12(H2O)138], showing polyhedral clusters (from [20]). (a,b) Polyhedral representations of the uranyl carbonate cage in two different orientations. (c) Both polyhedral and ball-and-stick representations of the ‘fundamental building unit’ FBU-1, with (d) FBU-2 and (e) FBU-3. Uranyl pentagonal and hexagonal bipyramids are yellow, carbonate triangles are black. Uranium, carbon, and oxygen atoms are shown as yellow, black, and red spheres, respectively. Not shown in this figure are numerous connecting Mg and Ca polyhedra, as well as (OH) groups.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The complex structure of ilmajokite [Na11KBaCe2Ti12Si37.5O94(OH)30·29H2O] (adapted from [28]) incorporates trigonal prismatic titanosilicate clusters of composition [Ce(Ti2SiO12)3(Si17O31)], which is possibly the most complex known molecule-like subunit thus far observed in minerals. Titanium octahedra (blue) and silicon tetrahedra (yellow) form a cage-like structure around a central cerium atom (green sphere). Note that this cluster model does not include numerous apical OH (i.e. silanol) groups on silicate tetrahedra.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marshall SM, Murray ARG, Cronin L. 2017. A probabilistic framework for identifying biosignatures using pathway complexity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160342. (10.1098/rsta.2016.0342) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall SM, et al. 2021. Identifying molecules as biosignatures with assembly theory and mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 12, 3033. (10.1038/s41467-021-23258-x) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marshall SM, Moore DG, Murray ARG, Walker SI, Cronin L. 2019. Quantifying the pathways to life using assembly spaces. (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.04649.pdf)
    1. Mathis C, Patarroyo KY, Cronin L. 2021. Understanding assembly indices. See http://www.molecular-assembly.com/learn/.
    1. Liu Y, Mathis C, Bajczyk MD, Marshall SM, Wilbraham L, Cronin L. 2021. Exploring and mapping chemical space with molecular assembly trees. Sci. Adv. 7, ebj2465. (10.1126/sciadv.abj2465) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types