Cabergoline for Lactation Inhibition After Second-Trimester Abortion or Pregnancy Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 37486652
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005190
Cabergoline for Lactation Inhibition After Second-Trimester Abortion or Pregnancy Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective: To assess cabergoline's efficacy at decreasing breast symptoms after second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss.
Methods: This was a double-blinded, block-randomized superiority trial comparing cabergoline 1 mg once to placebo for preventing bothersome breast engorgement after second-trimester uterine evacuation. We enrolled pregnant people at 18-28 weeks of gestation who were English- or Spanish-speaking and without contraindication to the study drug. Participants completed a validated, piloted, electronic survey at baseline and at multiple timepoints through 2 weeks postprocedure to assess breast symptoms, side effects, and bother. Our primary outcome was any breast symptoms (a composite of engorgement, milk leakage, tenderness, and need for pain relief) on day 4; we planned to enroll 80 patients to show a 30% difference in breast symptoms (80% power, α=0.049). A subgroup of participants returned for serum prolactin levels.
Results: After screening 150 patients from April 2021 to June 2022, we enrolled 73 participants. Baseline demographics were balanced between groups: median gestational age was 21 weeks (range 18-26 weeks), 56.2% of participants were nulliparous, 34.2% self-identified as Hispanic, and 37.0% had public insurance. At baseline, reported breast symptoms were similar between groups. Among 69 participants who returned surveys on day 4, significantly fewer participants receiving cabergoline reported any breast symptoms compared with placebo (27.8% vs 97.0%, P<.001) (primary outcome) and fewer reported significant bother (2.8% vs 33.3%, P=.001) (secondary outcome). These differences persisted through day 14. Reported incidence and severity of bother from side effects were similar between groups: most common were constipation, fatigue, and headache. Serum prolactin levels were similar at baseline. On day 4, mean serum prolactin level was 6.5 ng/mL (SD 2.2) for those who received cabergoline and 18.0 ng/mL (SD 5.9) for placebo (P=.049).
Conclusion: Cabergoline is an effective and well-tolerated strategy to prevent breast symptoms after second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04701333.
Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure This article discusses off-label use of cabergoline. Matthew F. Reeves reports receiving payments from GemBioPro (distributor of mifepristone, unrelated to cabergoline). The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Paracervical block as pain treatment during second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: an RCT with bupivacaine versus sodium chloride.Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev286. Epub 2015 Nov 15. Hum Reprod. 2016. PMID: 26573530 Clinical Trial.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
[Arrest of lactation after 2nd trimester abortion with a single dose of cabergoline in comparison with 10-day administration of teguride].Ceska Gynekol. 2003 Jan;68(1):46-50. Ceska Gynekol. 2003. PMID: 12708116 Clinical Trial. Czech.
-
Comparing pyridoxine with dopaminergic agonists (cabergoline and bromocriptine): Unveiling the strategy for lactation inhibition - A systematic review of clinical trials.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2024 Jun;53(6):102783. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102783. Epub 2024 Mar 28. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38554942 Review.
-
Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 30;11(11):CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 14;4:CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub4 PMID: 27901279 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
References
-
- Chen FH, Chen SL, Hu WY. Taiwanese women's experiences of lactation suppression after stillbirth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2015;44:510–7. doi: 10.1111/1552-6909.12724 - DOI
-
- Hagey JM, Truong T, Deans EI. Breast symptoms after pregnancy loss and abortion: an observational study [abstract]. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:103S. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000664260.95519.2e - DOI
-
- Sereshti M, Nahidi F, Simbar M, Bakhtiari M, Zayeri F. An exploration of the maternal experiences of breast engorgement and milk leakage after perinatal Loss. Glob J Health Sci 2016;8:234. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p234 - DOI
-
- Sriraman NK. The nuts and bolts of breastfeeding: anatomy and physiology of lactation. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2017;47:305–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2017.10.001 - DOI
-
- Spitz AM, Lee NC, Peterson HB. Treatment for lactation suppression: little progress in one hundred years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:1485–90. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70013-4 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous