Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020
- PMID: 36417304
- PMCID: PMC9707346
- DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020
Abstract
Problem/condition: CDC conducts abortion surveillance to document the number and characteristics of women obtaining legal induced abortions and number of abortion-related deaths in the United States.
Period covered: 2020.
Description of system: Each year, CDC requests abortion data from the central health agencies for the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and New York City. For 2020, a total of 49 reporting areas voluntarily provided aggregate abortion data to CDC. Of these, 48 reporting areas provided data each year during 2011-2020. Census and natality data were used to calculate abortion rates (number of abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years) and ratios (number of abortions per 1,000 live births), respectively. Abortion-related deaths from 2019 were assessed as part of CDC's Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS).
Results: A total of 620,327 abortions for 2020 were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. Among 48 reporting areas with data each year during 2011-2020, in 2020, a total of 615,911 abortions were reported, the abortion rate was 11.2 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years, and the abortion ratio was 198 abortions per 1,000 live births. From 2019 to 2020, the total number of abortions decreased 2% (from 625,346 total abortions), the abortion rate decreased 2% (from 11.4 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio increased 2% (from 195 abortions per 1,000 live births). From 2011 to 2020, the total number of reported abortions decreased 15% (from 727,554), the abortion rate decreased 18% (from 13.7 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-44 years), and the abortion ratio decreased 9% (from 217 abortions per 1,000 live births).In 2020, women in their 20s accounted for more than half of abortions (57.2%). Women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years accounted for the highest percentages of abortions (27.9% and 29.3%, respectively) and had the highest abortion rates (19.2 and 19.0 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 and 25-29 years, respectively). By contrast, adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥40 years accounted for the lowest percentages of abortions (0.2% and 3.7%, respectively) and had the lowest abortion rates (0.4 and 2.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged <15 and ≥40 years, respectively). However, abortion ratios were highest among adolescents (aged ≤19 years) and lowest among women aged 25-39 years.Abortion rates decreased from 2011 to 2020 among all age groups. The decrease in abortion rate was highest among adolescents compared with any other age group. From 2019 to 2020, abortion rates decreased or did not change for all age groups. Abortion ratios decreased from 2011 to 2020 for all age groups, except adolescents aged 15-19 years and women aged 25-29 years for whom abortion ratios increased. The decrease in abortion ratio was highest among women aged ≥40 years compared with any other age group. From 2019 to 2020, abortion ratios decreased for adolescents aged <15 years and women aged ≥35 and increased for women 15-34 years.In 2020, 80.9% of abortions were performed at ≤9 weeks' gestation, and nearly all (93.1%) were performed at ≤13 weeks' gestation. During 2011-2020, the percentage of abortions performed at >13 weeks' gestation remained consistently low (≤9.2%). In 2020, the highest percentage of abortions were performed by early medical abortion at ≤9 weeks' gestation (51.0%), followed by surgical abortion at ≤13 weeks' gestation (40.0%), surgical abortion at >13 weeks' gestation (6.7%), and medical abortion at >9 weeks' gestation (2.4%); all other methods were uncommon (<0.1%). Among those that were eligible (≤9 weeks' gestation), 63.9% of abortions were early medical abortions. In 2019, the most recent year for which PMSS data were reviewed for pregnancy-related deaths, four women died as a result of complications from legal induced abortion.
Interpretation: Among the 48 areas that reported data continuously during 2011-2020, overall decreases were observed during 2011-2020 in the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions. From 2019 to 2020, decreases also were observed in the total number and rate of reported abortions; however, a 2% increase was observed in the total abortion ratio.
Public health action: Abortion surveillance can be used to help evaluate programs aimed at promoting equitable access to patient-centered quality contraceptive services in the United States to reduce unintended pregnancies.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2021.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023 Nov 24;72(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7209a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023. PMID: 37992038 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2019.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Nov 26;70(9):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021. PMID: 34818321 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2018.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Nov 27;69(7):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6907a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020. PMID: 33237897 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2016.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 29;68(11):1-41. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6811a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019. PMID: 31774741
-
Cardiovascular hospitalizations and deaths in adults, children and pregnant women.Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Oct 5:S1875-2136(24)00324-3. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2024.08.007. Online ahead of print. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2024. PMID: 39414462 Review.
Cited by
-
Abortion Trajectory, Timing, and Access Study (ATTAS): study protocol.Arch Public Health. 2024 Nov 13;82(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01418-x. Arch Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39538245 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy outcomes in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241277520. doi: 10.1177/17455057241277520. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39287599 Free PMC article.
-
Trends over 50 years with liberal abortion laws in the Nordic countries.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 10;19(7):e0305701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305701. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38985688 Free PMC article.
-
How have changes in accessibility and public funding influenced contraceptive use among Norwegian adolescents? A cohort study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Sep;103(9):1789-1798. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14905. Epub 2024 Jun 27. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024. PMID: 38937966 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of the first and second trimester abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06614-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38858628 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gamble SB, Strauss LT, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ 2008;57(No. SS-13):1–32. - PubMed
-
- Jones RK, Kost K, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Finer LB. Trends in abortion in the United States. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;52:119–29. - PubMed
-
- Pazol K, Zane SB, Parker WY, Hall LR, Berg C, Cook DA. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 2011;60(No. SS-15):1–41. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials