Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs
- PMID: 35852261
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832
Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs
Abstract
In June 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision on Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization, a direct challenge to Roe v Wade. A detailed policy analysis by the Guttmacher Institute projects that, if Roe v Wade is overturned, 21 states are certain to ban abortion and five states are likely to ban abortion. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires access to abortion training for all obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. We performed a comprehensive study of all accredited U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs to assess how many of these programs and trainees are currently located in states projected to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. We found that, of 286 accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency programs with current residents, 128 (44.8%) are in states certain or likely to ban abortion if Roe v Wade is overturned. Therefore, of 6,007 current obstetrics and gynecology residents, 2,638 (43.9%) are certain or likely to lack access to in-state abortion training. Preparation for the reversal of Roe v Wade should include not only a recognition of the negative effects on patient access to abortion care in affected states, but also of the dramatic implications for obstetrics and gynecology residency training.
Copyright © 2022 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Kavita Vinekar served as a Merck Nexplanon trainer from 2018 to 2019. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
New Gaps and Urgent Needs in Graduate Medical Education and Training in Abortion.Acad Med. 2023 Apr 1;98(4):436-439. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005154. Epub 2023 Jan 16. Acad Med. 2023. PMID: 36656271
-
Transparency around abortion training on obstetrics and gynecology residency program websites.Contraception. 2024 Feb;130:110296. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110296. Epub 2023 Sep 20. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 37739304
-
Trainee Perspectives Regarding the Effect of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Training.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Jul;33(7):908-915. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0960. Epub 2024 Apr 17. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024. PMID: 38629505
-
Abortion training in residency programs.J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1994 Sep-Oct;49(5):150-2. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1994. PMID: 7806758 Review.
-
Two years in a post- Dobbs world: clinical, social and professional consequences.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 1;36(6):426-432. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975. Epub 2024 Jul 10. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39145489 Review.
Cited by
-
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39581967 Free PMC article.
-
Management of early pregnancy loss by reproductive endocrinologists: does access to mifepristone matter?F S Rep. 2024 May 22;5(3):252-258. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.05.005. eCollection 2024 Sep. F S Rep. 2024. PMID: 39381661 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court Decision on Orthopaedic Residency Programs: A Collaborative Orthopaedic Education Research Group (COERG) Survey.Cureus. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67400. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67400. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39310423 Free PMC article.
-
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38551970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trends in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applications in the Year After Abortion Access Changes.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355017. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55017. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38324311 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute. An overview of abortion laws. Accessed March 16, 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws
-
- Guttmacher Institute. 26 states are certain or likely to ban abortion without Roe: here's which ones and why. Accessed November 23, 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2021/10/26-states-are-certain-or-like...
-
- Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in obstetrics and gynecology. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/220_obst...
-
- Horvath S, Zite N, Turk J, Ogburn T, Steinauer J. Resident abortion care training and satisfaction: results from the 2020 Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology in-training examination survey. Obstet Gynecol 2021;138:472–4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004512 - DOI
-
- American Medical Association. FREIDA TM AMA residency & fellowship programs database. Accessed December 9, 2021. https://freida.ama-assn.org/
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical