False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right
- PMID: 32883863
- DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2428
False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right
Abstract
Digital media are critical for contemporary activism-even low-effort "clicktivism" is politically consequential and contributes to offline participation. We argue that in the United States and throughout the industrialized West, left- and right-wing activists use digital and legacy media differently to achieve political goals. Although left-wing actors operate primarily through "hashtag activism" and offline protest, right-wing activists manipulate legacy media, migrate to alternative platforms, and work strategically with partisan media to spread their messages. Although scholarship suggests that the right has embraced strategic disinformation and conspiracy theories more than the left, more research is needed to reveal the magnitude and character of left-wing disinformation. Such ideological asymmetries between left- and right-wing activism hold critical implications for democratic practice, social media governance, and the interdisciplinary study of digital politics.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
Similar articles
-
The advantage of the right in social media news sharing.PNAS Nexus. 2022 Jul 29;1(3):pgac137. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac137. eCollection 2022 Jul. PNAS Nexus. 2022. PMID: 36741446 Free PMC article.
-
The shifting politics of patient activism: From bio-sociality to bio-digital citizenship.Health (London). 2019 Jul;23(4):478-494. doi: 10.1177/1363459318815944. Epub 2018 Dec 7. Health (London). 2019. PMID: 30526091 Review.
-
Counter-Discourse Activism on Social Media: The Case of Challenging "Poverty Porn" Television.Comput Support Coop Work. 2017;26(3):345-385. doi: 10.1007/s10606-017-9275-z. Epub 2017 May 16. Comput Support Coop Work. 2017. PMID: 32055106 Free PMC article.
-
Who polarizes Twitter? Ideological polarization, partisan groups and strategic networked campaigning on Twitter during the 2017 and 2021 German Federal elections 'Bundestagswahlen'.Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022;12(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s13278-022-00958-w. Epub 2022 Oct 11. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2022. PMID: 36246430 Free PMC article.
-
The psychology of online activism and social movements: relations between online and offline collective action.Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:49-54. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003. Epub 2020 Mar 21. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32330859 Review.
Cited by
-
Who supports Bernie? Analyzing identity and ideological variation on Twitter during the 2020 democratic primaries.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 11;19(4):e0294735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294735. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38603640 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting the Popularity of Information on Social Platforms without Underlying Network Structure.Entropy (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;25(6):916. doi: 10.3390/e25060916. Entropy (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37372260 Free PMC article.
-
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election.Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1096-1105. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01564-2. Epub 2023 Apr 13. Nat Hum Behav. 2023. PMID: 37055575
-
Deplatforming did not decrease Parler users' activity on fringe social media.PNAS Nexus. 2023 Mar 21;2(3):pgad035. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad035. eCollection 2023 Mar. PNAS Nexus. 2023. PMID: 36959908 Free PMC article.
-
The advantage of the right in social media news sharing.PNAS Nexus. 2022 Jul 29;1(3):pgac137. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac137. eCollection 2022 Jul. PNAS Nexus. 2022. PMID: 36741446 Free PMC article.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
