iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871089/
Zygomorphic flowers have fewer potential pollinator species - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;16(9):20200307.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0307. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

Zygomorphic flowers have fewer potential pollinator species

Jeremy B Yoder  1 , Giancarlo Gomez  1 , Colin J Carlson  2
Affiliations

Zygomorphic flowers have fewer potential pollinator species

Jeremy B Yoder et al. Biol Lett. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Botanists have long identified bilaterally symmetrical (zygomorphic) flowers with more specialized pollination interactions than radially symmetrical (actinomorphic) flowers. Zygomorphic flowers facilitate more precise contact with pollinators, guide pollinator behaviour and exclude less effective pollinators. However, whether zygomorphic flowers are actually visited by a smaller subset of available pollinator species has not been broadly evaluated. We compiled 53 609 floral visitation records in 159 communities and classified the plants' floral symmetry. Globally and within individual communities, plants with zygomorphic flowers are indeed visited by fewer species. At the same time, zygomorphic flowers share a somewhat larger proportion of their visitor species with other co-occurring plants and have particularly high sharing with co-occurring plants that also have zygomorphic flowers. Visitation sub-networks for zygomorphic species also show differences that may arise from reduced visitor diversity, including greater connectance, greater web asymmetry and lower coextinction robustness of both plants and visitor species-but these changes do not necessarily translate to whole plant-visitor communities. These results provide context for widely documented associations between zygomorphy and diversification and imply that species with zygomorphic flowers may face a greater risk of extinction due to pollinator loss.

Keywords: ecological specialization; floral morphology; interaction networks; pollination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The global plant-visitation dataset. (a) Global distribution of the plant-visitor networks, with points scaled to indicate numbers of plant taxa. (b) Bar plots giving the number of plant taxa for each network, coloured according to floral symmetry ((i) full dataset, (ii), all networks except for the largest, to provide better visibility). (c) Visitor species per plant, grouped by floral symmetry. (d) Sharing of visitor species with all co-occurring plant species, and co-occurring species with each type of floral symmetry. (e) Mean visitor species per plant in sub-networks for plants with differing symmetries, with grey lines linking points for zygomorphic and actinomorphic taxa from the same network, plotted against latitude of the network location. In (c) and (d), asterisks indicate significant differences in one-tailed Wilcoxon tests: *p < 0.01, **p < 10−4, ***p < 10−5.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Floral symmetry and plant-visitor network structure. (a) Network descriptive statistics for sub-networks based on floral symmetry. Grey lines link points representing zygomorphic and actinomorphic sub-networks from the same source network, horizontal black bars mark the median value within each floral symmetry type, and asterisks mark significant differences in one-tailed paired Wilcoxon tests. (b) Scatterplots of relationships between the proportion of zygomorphic flowers in a network and the set of network structure metrics in (a); linear regression lines (white with grey 95% CI) are given when the correlation is significant with p ≤ 0.05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Takhtajan A. 1969. Flowering plants: origin and dispersal. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
    1. Darwin C. 1877. The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilised by insects, 2nd edn New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
    1. Stebbins GL. 1974. Flowering plants: evolution above the species level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    1. Endress PK. 2012. The immense diversity of floral monosymmetry and asymmetry across angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 78, 345–397. (10.1007/s12229-012-9106-3) - DOI
    1. Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Dudash MR, Wilson P, Fenster CCB, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 375–403. (10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources