iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32648270/
Development of an App to Facilitate Communication and Shared Decision-making With Parents of Febrile Infants ≤ 60 Days Old - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;28(1):46-59.
doi: 10.1111/acem.14082. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Development of an App to Facilitate Communication and Shared Decision-making With Parents of Febrile Infants ≤ 60 Days Old

Affiliations

Development of an App to Facilitate Communication and Shared Decision-making With Parents of Febrile Infants ≤ 60 Days Old

Paul L Aronson et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to develop and test a tool to engage parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days of age evaluated in the emergency department (ED). The tool was designed to improve communication for all parents and to support shared decision-making (SDM) about whether to perform a lumbar puncture (LP) for infants 29 to 60 days of age.

Methods: We conducted a multiphase development and testing process: 1) individual, semistructured interviews with parents and clinicians (pediatric and general emergency medicine [EM] physicians and pediatric EM nurses) to learn their preferences for a communication and SDM tool; 2) design of a "storyboard" of the tool with design impression testing; 3) development of a software application (i.e., app) prototype, called e-Care; and 4) usability testing of e-Care, using qualitative assessment and the system usability scale (SUS).

Results: We interviewed 27 parents and 23 clinicians. Interviews revealed several themes, including that a communication tool should augment but not replace verbal communication; a Web-based format was preferred; and information about infections and testing, including the rationales for specific tests, would be valuable. We then developed separate versions of e-Care for infants ≤ 28 days and 29 to 60 days of age, in both English and Spanish. The e-Care app includes four sections: 1) homepage; 2) why testing is done; 3) what tests are done; and 4) what happens after testing, including a table for parents of infants 29 to 60 days of age to compare the risks/benefits of LP in preparation for an SDM conversation. Parents and clinicians reported that e-Care was understandable and helpful. The mean SUS score was 90.3 (95% confidence interval = 84 to 96.6), representing "excellent" usability.

Conclusions: The e-Care app is a useable and understandable tool to support communication and SDM with parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days of age in the ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Phases of app development
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Design of the e-Care homepage
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A) Text to facilitate SDM between the parents and physician, B) Table for parents to compare the risk and benefits of LP, C) Risk estimate as icon array
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A) Text to facilitate SDM between the parents and physician, B) Table for parents to compare the risk and benefits of LP, C) Risk estimate as icon array
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
A) Text to facilitate SDM between the parents and physician, B) Table for parents to compare the risk and benefits of LP, C) Risk estimate as icon array

Comment in

  • Sharing Is Caring: Can an App Help?
    Ishimine P. Ishimine P. Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;28(1):138-140. doi: 10.1111/acem.14133. Epub 2020 Oct 13. Acad Emerg Med. 2021. PMID: 32949065 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baskin MN. The prevalence of serious bacterial infections by age in febrile infants during the first 3 months of life. Pediatr Ann 1993;22:462–6. - PubMed
    1. Wier LM, Yu H, Owens PL, Washington R. Overview of children in the emergency department, 2010: statistical brief #157 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2006. - PubMed
    1. Kuppermann N, Dayan PS, Levine DA, Vitale M, Tzimenatos L, Tunik MG, et al. A clinical prediction rule to identify febrile infants 60 days and younger at low risk for serious bacterial infections. JAMA Pediatr 2019;173:342–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biondi EA, Lee B, Ralston SL, Winikor JM, Lynn JF, Dixon A, et al. Prevalence of bacteremia and bacterial meningitis in febrile neonates and infants in the second month of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e190874. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aronson PL, Thurm C, Alpern ER, Alessandrini EA, Williams DJ, Shah SS, et al. Variation in care of the febrile young infant <90 days in US pediatric emergency departments. Pediatrics 2014;134:667–77. - PubMed

Publication types