iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30186277
Identification and Classification for the Lactobacillus casei Group - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 22:9:1974.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01974. eCollection 2018.

Identification and Classification for the Lactobacillus casei Group

Affiliations

Identification and Classification for the Lactobacillus casei Group

Chien-Hsun Huang et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus are phenotypically and genotypically closely related, and together comprise the L. casei group. Although the strains of this group are commercially valuable as probiotics, the taxonomic status and nomenclature of the L. casei group have long been contentious because of the difficulties in identifying these three species by using the most frequently used genotypic methodology of 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Long used as the gold standard for species classification, DNA-DNA hybridization is laborious, requires expert skills, and is difficult to use routinely in laboratories. Currently, genome-based comparisons, including average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH), are commonly applied to bacterial taxonomy as alternatives to the gold standard method for the demarcating phylogenetic relationships. To establish quick and accurate methods for identifying strains in the L. casei group at the species and subspecies levels, we developed species- and subspecies-specific identification methods based on housekeeping gene sequences and whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) spectral pattern analysis. By phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated housekeeping gene sequences (dnaJ, dnaK, mutL, pheS, and yycH), 53 strains were separated into four clusters corresponding to the four species: L. casei, L. paracasei and L. rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus chiayiensis sp. nov. A multiplex minisequencing assay using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-specific primers based on the dnaK gene sequences and species-specific primers based on the mutL gene sequences provided high resolution that enabled the strains at the species level to be identified as L. casei, L. paracasei, and L. rhamnosus. By MALDI-TOF MS analysis coupled with an internal database and ClinProTools software, species- and subspecies-level L. casei group strains were identified based on reliable scores and species- and subspecies-specific MS peaks. The L. paracasei strains were distinguished clearly at the subspecies level based on subspecies-specific MS peaks. This article describes the rapid and accurate methods used for identification and classification of strains in the L. casei group based on housekeeping gene sequences and MALDI-TOF MS analysis as well as the novel speciation of this group including L. chiayiensis sp. nov. and 'Lactobacillus zeae' by genome-based methods.

Keywords: Lactobacillus casei group; MALDI-TOF MS; MLSA; species-specific PCR; whole genome sequence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Concatenated split network tree based on five genes. The dnaJ, dnaK, mutL, pheS, and yycH gene sequences (2567 bp) from 53 L. casei group strains were concatenated and reconstructed using the SplitTree4 program. Sequence similarities were corrected using the Jukes-Cantor correction. Bar, 0.01 expected nucleotide substitutions per site.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Dendrogram derived from UPGMA cluster analysis of MALDI-TOF MS spectra in the 2000–9500 m/z region (224 peaks) of strains in the L. casei group. Bootstrap values (%) based on 1000 replicates are given at the nodes. Bar, proportion of different peaks.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Phylogenomic analysis of the L. casei group. The values generated in the Gegenees software shown in the heat map indicate the percentage of similarity between the analyzed genomes; the colors varies from red (low similarity) to green (high similarity) (A). The split network tree was constructed using the SplitTree4 program based on the fragmented all-against-all comparison with the Gegenees software (B).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Ortholog analysis among six type strains in the L. casei group. Gene prediction and annotation were performed by RAST automated web server. Venn diagram showing the number of core, shared and unique genes for each genome. Numerals in parentheses under strain name are the numbers of the predicted ORFs.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
View showing the current state in classification of the L. casei group. The L. casei group has at least four distinct species; L. casei, L. chiayiensis sp. nov., L. paracasei, and L. rhamnosus. L. paracasei is comprised of two subspecies; L. paracasei subsp. paracasei and L. paracasei subsp. tolerans. ‘L. zeae’ has a possibility to be reclassified as the independent new taxon.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ågren J., Sundström A., Håfström T., Segerman B. (2012). Gegenees: fragmented alignment of multiple genomes for determining phylogenomic distances and genetic signatures unique for specified target groups. PLoS One 7:e39107. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahrné S., Molin G., StÅhl S. (1989). Plasmids in Lactobacillus strains isolated from meat and meat products. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 11 320–325. 10.1016/S0723-2020(89)80031-1 - DOI
    1. Anderson A. C., Sanunu M., Schneider C., Clad A., Karygianni L., Hellwig E., et al. (2014). Rapid species-level identification of vaginal and oral lactobacilli using MALDI-TOF MS analysis and 16S rDNA sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 14:312. 10.1186/s12866-014-0312-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angelakis E., Million M., Henry M., Raoult D. (2011). Rapid and accurate bacterial identification in probiotics and yoghurts by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. J. Food Sci. 76 M568–M572. 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02369.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashraf R., Shah N. P. (2014). Immune system stimulation by probiotic microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 54 938–956. 10.1080/10408398.2011.619671 - DOI - PubMed