iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30135823/
Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: A European stakeholder survey - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 25:8:1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2017.01.001. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: A European stakeholder survey

Affiliations

Attitudes towards digital treatment for depression: A European stakeholder survey

Naira Topooco et al. Internet Interv. .

Abstract

Background: The integration of digital treatments into national mental health services is on the agenda in the European Union. The E-COMPARED consortium conducted a survey aimed at exploring stakeholders' knowledge, acceptance and expectations of digital treatments for depression, and at identifying factors that might influence their opinions when considering the implementation of these approaches.

Method: An online survey was conducted in eight European countries: France, Germany, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and The United Kingdom. Organisations representing government bodies, care providers, service-users, funding/insurance bodies, technical developers and researchers were invited to participate in the survey. The participating countries and organisations reflect the diversity in health care infrastructures and e-health implementation across Europe.

Results: A total of 764 organisations were invited to the survey during the period March-June 2014, with 175 of these organisations participating in our survey. The participating stakeholders reported moderate knowledge of digital treatments and considered cost-effectiveness to be the primary incentive for integration into care services. Low feasibility of delivery within existing care services was considered to be a primary barrier. Digital treatments were regarded more suitable for milder forms of depression. Stakeholders showed greater acceptability towards blended treatment (the integration of face-to-face and internet sessions within the same treatment protocol) compared to standalone internet treatments. Organisations in countries with developed e-health solutions reported greater knowledge and acceptability of digital treatments.

Conclusion: Mental health stakeholders in Europe are aware of the potential benefits of digital interventions. However, there are variations between countries and stakeholders in terms of level of knowledge about such interventions and their feasibility within routine care services. The high acceptance of blended treatments is an interesting finding that indicates a gradual integration of technology into clinical practice may fit the attitudes and needs of stakeholders. The potential of the blended treatment approach, in terms of enhancing acceptance of digital treatment while retaining the benefit of cost-effectiveness in delivery, should be further explored.

Funding: The E-COMPARED project has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 603098.

Keywords: Blended treatment; Comparative effectiveness research; Depression; Digital treatment; E-mental health; Internet-delivered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Targeted stakeholder groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Information on the E-COMPARED survey start page.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Response rates and percentage of the total sample for participating countries.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersson G. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL: 2014. The Internet and CBT: a Clinical Guide.
    1. Andersson G. Internet-delivered psychological treatments. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2016;12:157–179. - PubMed
    1. Andersson G., Hedman E. Effectiveness of guided Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy in regular clinical settings. Verhaltenstherapie. 2013;23:140–148.
    1. Andersson G., Bergström J., Holländare F., Carlbring P., Kaldo V., Ekselius L. Internet-based self-help for depression: a randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry. 2005;187:456–461. - PubMed
    1. Andersson G., Cuijpers P., Carlbring P., Riper H., Hedman E. Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(3):288–295. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources