Association of Multivitamin and Mineral Supplementation and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 29991644
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004224
Association of Multivitamin and Mineral Supplementation and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Multiple studies have attempted to identify the association between multivitamin/mineral (MVM) supplementation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes, but the benefits remain controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the associations between MVM supplementation and various CVD outcomes, including coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke.
Methods and results: We conducted a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1970 and August 2016. We included clinical trials and prospective cohort studies in the general population evaluating associations between MVM supplementation and CVD outcomes. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Eighteen studies with 2 019 862 participants and 18 363 326 person-years of follow-up were included in the analysis. Five studies specified the dose/type of MVM supplement and the rest did not. Overall, there was no association between MVM supplementation and CVD mortality (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.04), CHD mortality (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13), stroke mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.09), or stroke incidence (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.05). There was no association between MVM supplements and CVD or CHD mortality in prespecified subgroups categorized by mean follow-up period, mean age, period of MVM use, sex, type of population, exclusion of patients with history of CHD, and adjustment for diet, adjustment for smoking, adjustment for physical activity, and study site. In contrast, MVM use did seem to be associated with a lower risk of CHD incidence (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97). However, this association did not remain significant in the pooled subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19).
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of clinical trials and prospective cohort studies demonstrates that MVM supplementation does not improve cardiovascular outcomes in the general population.
Keywords: cardiovascular diseases; coronary disease; incidence; mortality; myocardial infarction; stroke.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.
Comment in
-
Multivitamins Do Not Reduce Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality and Should Not Be Taken for This Purpose: How Do We Know That?Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jul;11(7):e004886. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004886. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018. PMID: 29991647 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A systematic review of multivitamin-multimineral use and cardiovascular disease and cancer incidence and total mortality.J Am Coll Nutr. 2013;32(5):339-54. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2013.839909. J Am Coll Nutr. 2013. PMID: 24219377 Review.
-
Marine Omega-3 Supplementation and Cardiovascular Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 13 Randomized Controlled Trials Involving 127 477 Participants.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e013543. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013543. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019. PMID: 31567003 Free PMC article.
-
Vitamin and mineral supplements in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: An updated systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Dec 17;159(12):824-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-12-201312170-00729. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24217421 Review.
-
Vitamin supplement use in a low-risk population of US male physicians and subsequent cardiovascular mortality.Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jul 8;162(13):1472-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.13.1472. Arch Intern Med. 2002. PMID: 12090883
-
Aspirin Use in Adults: Cancer, All-Cause Mortality, and Harms: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Sep. Report No.: 13-05193-EF-1. PMID: 26491756 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Use of Dietary Supplements Among People With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in the United States: A Population-Based Analysis From NHANES.J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e033748. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033748. Epub 2024 May 3. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38700042 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating agreement between evidence from randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition: a meta-research replication study.Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;39(4):363-378. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01058-5. Epub 2024 Jan 4. Eur J Epidemiol. 2024. PMID: 38177572 Free PMC article.
-
Is Dietary (Food) Supplement Intake Reported in European National Nutrition Surveys?Nutrients. 2023 Dec 13;15(24):5090. doi: 10.3390/nu15245090. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 38140349 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multivitamin use and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in cancer survivors.Br J Cancer. 2024 Jan;130(1):82-87. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02421-9. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Br J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38017130 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Reported Dietary Supplement Use in Cognitively Normal National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Participants Aged 55 and Older From 2015 to 2019.J Nutr. 2023 Jun;153(6):1771-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 11. J Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37044210 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical