Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
- PMID: 26279234
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.043
Attentive Tracking of Sound Sources
Abstract
Auditory scenes often contain concurrent sound sources, but listeners are typically interested in just one of these and must somehow select it for further processing. One challenge is that real-world sounds such as speech vary over time and as a consequence often cannot be separated or selected based on particular values of their features (e.g., high pitch). Here we show that human listeners can circumvent this challenge by tracking sounds with a movable focus of attention. We synthesized pairs of voices that changed in pitch and timbre over random, intertwined trajectories, lacking distinguishing features or linguistic information. Listeners were cued beforehand to attend to one of the voices. We measured their ability to extract this cued voice from the mixture by subsequently presenting the ending portion of one voice and asking whether it came from the cued voice. We found that listeners could perform this task but that performance was mediated by attention-listeners who performed best were also more sensitive to perturbations in the cued voice than in the uncued voice. Moreover, the task was impossible if the source trajectories did not maintain sufficient separation in feature space. The results suggest a locus of attention that can follow a sound's trajectory through a feature space, likely aiding selection and segregation amid similar distractors.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Auditory Perception: Attentive Solution to the Cocktail Party Problem.Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 31;25(17):R757-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.064. Curr Biol. 2015. PMID: 26325136
Similar articles
-
Processing of short auditory stimuli: the rapid audio sequential presentation paradigm (RASP).Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:443-51. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_49. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013. PMID: 23716251
-
Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location.J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2178-89. doi: 10.1121/1.1609994. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003. PMID: 14587615
-
Speech segregation based on sound localization.J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):2236-52. doi: 10.1121/1.1610463. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003. PMID: 14587621
-
The cocktail-party problem revisited: early processing and selection of multi-talker speech.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1465-87. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0882-9. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015. PMID: 25828463 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):283-99. doi: 10.1177/1084713808325306. Epub 2008 Oct 30. Trends Amplif. 2008. PMID: 18974202 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enhanced salience of edge frequencies in auditory pattern recognition.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Oct 26. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02971-x. Online ahead of print. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 39461935
-
Models optimized for real-world tasks reveal the task-dependent necessity of precise temporal coding in hearing.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Sep 16:2024.04.21.590435. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.21.590435. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 4;15(1):10590. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54700-5 PMID: 38712054 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Why are listeners hindered by talker variability?Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):104-121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02355-6. Epub 2023 Aug 14. Psychon Bull Rev. 2024. PMID: 37580454 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Distracting linguistic information impairs neural tracking of attended speech.Curr Res Neurobiol. 2022 May 28;3:100043. doi: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100043. eCollection 2022. Curr Res Neurobiol. 2022. PMID: 36518343 Free PMC article.
-
Defining attention from an auditory perspective.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;14(1):e1610. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1610. Epub 2022 Jun 1. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023. PMID: 35642475 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources