iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26139243/
The SMARCA2/4 ATPase Domain Surpasses the Bromodomain as a Drug Target in SWI/SNF-Mutant Cancers: Insights from cDNA Rescue and PFI-3 Inhibitor Studies - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Sep 15;75(18):3865-3878.
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3798. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

The SMARCA2/4 ATPase Domain Surpasses the Bromodomain as a Drug Target in SWI/SNF-Mutant Cancers: Insights from cDNA Rescue and PFI-3 Inhibitor Studies

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The SMARCA2/4 ATPase Domain Surpasses the Bromodomain as a Drug Target in SWI/SNF-Mutant Cancers: Insights from cDNA Rescue and PFI-3 Inhibitor Studies

Bhavatarini Vangamudi et al. Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The SWI/SNF multisubunit complex modulates chromatin structure through the activity of two mutually exclusive catalytic subunits, SMARCA2 and SMARCA4, which both contain a bromodomain and an ATPase domain. Using RNAi, cancer-specific vulnerabilities have been identified in SWI/SNF-mutant tumors, including SMARCA4-deficient lung cancer; however, the contribution of conserved, druggable protein domains to this anticancer phenotype is unknown. Here, we functionally deconstruct the SMARCA2/4 paralog dependence of cancer cells using bioinformatics, genetic, and pharmacologic tools. We evaluate a selective SMARCA2/4 bromodomain inhibitor (PFI-3) and characterize its activity in chromatin-binding and cell-functional assays focusing on cells with altered SWI/SNF complex (e.g., lung, synovial sarcoma, leukemia, and rhabdoid tumors). We demonstrate that PFI-3 is a potent, cell-permeable probe capable of displacing ectopically expressed, GFP-tagged SMARCA2-bromodomain from chromatin, yet contrary to target knockdown, the inhibitor fails to display an antiproliferative phenotype. Mechanistically, the lack of pharmacologic efficacy is reconciled by the failure of bromodomain inhibition to displace endogenous, full-length SMARCA2 from chromatin as determined by in situ cell extraction, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and target gene expression studies. Furthermore, using inducible RNAi and cDNA complementation (bromodomain- and ATPase-dead constructs), we unequivocally identify the ATPase domain, and not the bromodomain of SMARCA2, as the relevant therapeutic target with the catalytic activity suppressing defined transcriptional programs. Taken together, our complementary genetic and pharmacologic studies exemplify a general strategy for multidomain protein drug-target validation and in case of SMARCA2/4 highlight the potential for drugging the more challenging helicase/ATPase domain to deliver on the promise of synthetic-lethality therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Genomic analysis of the SWI/SNF complex in human cancer
(A) Percentage distribution of lesions (mutations and CN changes) in SWI/SNF components across tumors profiled by TCGA and other laboratories (Supplementary Table S1). (B) SWI/SNF mutation spectrum in LUAD (n=229 tumors; 121 mutations). (C) Correlation of SMARCA4 CN with gene expression (RNA-Seq Expression by Expectation Maximization (RSEM)). (D) CN loss of SMARCA2/4 are mutually exclusive in LUAD (left panel, n = 493) and LUSC (right panel, n = 490). Oncoprint (www.cbioportal.org): blue - high CN loss (GISTIC 2.0 threshold value of −2); red - high CN gain (GISTIC 2.0 threshold value of 2); green - mutations. (E) SMARCA4 has the highest negative outlier sum statistics among SWI/SNF components (LUAD; n = 598). (F) Histogram showing bimodal distribution of SMARCA4 gene expression (LUAD; n = 548) highlighting the predicted patient ‘responder’ population (red). (G) Protein expression and SMARCA4 genomic annotation across lung cancer cell lines: Mutation (*), Copy-Number Loss (**) and Gene Silencing (***).
Figure 2
Figure 2. SMARCA4-deficient lung cancer cells selectively depend on SMARCA2
(A) SMARCA2/4 protein levels in cell lines selected for RNAi studies. (B) A549 (SMARCA4-deficient) and NCI-H460 (SMARCA4-proficient) cells transduced with control (shLuc) or SMARCA2-targeting shRNAs (shS2) and assessed for knockdown and (C) cell viability one week post-puromycin selection (SD, n=6). (D) Clonogenic assay and crystal violet staining of colonies after 10-14 days. (E) A549 cells with inducible expression/reconstitution of full-length SMARCA4 cDNA grown in the presence or absence of doxycycline (+/−Dox) and analyzed 4 and 7 days post-doxycycline induction. (F) Following doxycycline treatment (5 days), A549 cells were transfected with either non-silencing control (Ctrl) or SMARCA2 siRNAs (S7 and S8) and evaluated for protein knockdown (5 days post-transfection) and (G) clonogenicity.
Figure 3
Figure 3. PFI-3 is a potent, selective and cell permeable bromodomain inhibitor of SMARCA2/4
(A) Chemical structure of PFI-3 and biochemical potency (BROMOScan Kd's). (B) BROMOScan dose-response curves using recombinant purified bromodomains. (C) PFI-3 selectivity (2 μM) across 32 bromodomains (DiscoverRx). (D) In situ cell extraction of Hela cells expressing GFP-tagged SMARCA2 bromodomain (green) co-treated with SAHA (5 μM) and PFI-3 (or DMSO control) for 2 hours with Hoescht nuclear counterstain (red). Hela control cells expressing GFP-tagged BRD4 treated (2 hours) with JQ1. (E) Displacement of the SMARCA2 bromodomain from chromatin (IC50) quantified based on mean GFP signal per nucleus (SD, n=6).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Pharmacological inhibition of SMARCA2/4 bromodomain in lung cancer
(A) Viability of SMARCA4-deficient (A549, H1299 and H157) or SMARCA4-proficient (H460) cells following PFI-3 treatment (72 hrs). Error bars represent SD, n=3. (B) A549 clonogenic assay (PFI-3 and media replenished every three days for 1.5 weeks). (C) In situ cell extraction (A549 cells) treated with PFI-3 or JQ1 control for 2 hrs followed by IF staining for endogenous, chromatin-bound bromodomain (green) and Hoescht nuclear counterstain (red). (D) IF quantification using SMARCA2 knockdown as specificity control with (E) corresponding immunoblot confirmation.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Evaluation of PFI-3 in synovial sarcoma and rhabdoid tumor cells
(A) Viability of synovial sarcoma (Aska and Yamato) and HeLa cells treated with PFI-3 (96 hrs) relative to DMSO-treated controls (SEM, n=3). (B) Long-term (2-week) proliferation assay. Cells were split and replenished with fresh media/PFI-3 every 3 or 4 days counting viable cells (SEM, n=3). (C) PFI-3 treatment (3 days) does not repress Sox2 expression in Yamato cells. Sox2 transcript levels (RT-qPCR) normalized to GAPDH (SEM, n=12). (D) Control (DMSO) and PFI-3-treated Yamato cells (day 3) subjected to anti-SMARCA4 ChIP followed by qPCR for Sox2 promoter regions (target gene) or MyoD1 exon1 locus (negative control). The decrease in occupancy at the Sox2 locus (10 uM) is small but significant *P ≤ 0.05 (SEM, n=9). (E) A-204 and G-401 rhabdoid cells transduced with SMARCA4-targeting (shS4-4, shS4-5) or control (shLuc) shRNAs and analyzed for (E) protein knockdown (1 week post-puromycin selection), (F) colony formation (2-3 weeks post-puromycin), and (G) viability (CellTiter-Glo; 6 days post-puromycin). Error bars represent SD, n=6. (H) PFI-3 does not impair growth of G-401 cells (clonogenecity 1.5 weeks; similar data for A-204 not shown). Media/PFI-3 was replenished every three days.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Rescue experiments highlight the importance of ATPase activity for cancer-specific vulnerability
(A) SMARCA2 cDNA rescue experiments in H1299 cells transduced with SMARCA2-targeting (5’UTR) shRNA (shS2) or control shRNA (shLuc) and analyzed by immunoblotting 10 days post-puromycin selection. (B) In parallel, the isogenic cell lines were seeded in 6-well plates (24-hours post-puromycin selection) and after 2 weeks stained by crystal violet and (C) colony forming units (CFU) were quantified. (D) SMARCA4 cDNA rescue/reconstitution experiments in A549 cells transduced with indicated shRNAs and analyzed by immunoblotting 10 days post-puromycin selection. (E) Clonogenic assay (crystal violet staining; 1.5 weeks) and (F) quantification of colony forming units (SD, n=3).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Chromatin binding and gene set enrichment highlights the importance of ATPase catalytic activity for cancer-specific vulnerability
(A) IF images (H1299 cells) expressing either vector control, or HA-tagged SMARCA2 wild-type, bromodomain-mutant, or ATPase-dead constructs (red) and Hoechst counterstain (blue). (B) Quantification of chromatin binding (normalized to non-extracted IF signal). (C) Clustering of 1000 most variable genes for SMARCA2 and (D) SMARCA4 rescue experiments. (E) SMARCA2 knockdown signatures (derived from A549 cells reconstituted with SMARCA4) comprising up-regulated (UP) and (F) down-regulated (DOWN) genes. The ranked gene list (X-axis) was derived from the SMARCA2 rescue experiments comparing ATP-Dead with WT as query. Genes responding differently (interaction contrast – Group 3 vs Group 2) where ranked according to their p-values with direction provided by the fold change. (G) Significantly enriched gene sets (mSigDB) shared between SMARCA2 and SMARCA4 focusing on their ATPase activity (i.e. WT vs ATP-Dead cDNA expression).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Geutjes EJ, Bajpe PK, Bernards R. Targeting the epigenome for treatment of cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31(34):3827–44. - PubMed
    1. Garraway LA, Lander ES. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell. 2013;153(1):17–37. - PubMed
    1. Kadoch C, Hargreaves DC, Hodges C, Elias L, Ho L, Ranish J, et al. Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy. Nat Genet. 2013;45(6):592–601. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shain AH, Pollack JR. The spectrum of SWI/SNF mutations, ubiquitous in human cancers. PloS one. 2013;8(1):e55119. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson BG, Roberts CW. SWI/SNF nucleosome remodellers and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(7):481–92. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms