iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2479358
The detection and interpretation of urinary eosinophils - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Nov;113(11):1256-8.

The detection and interpretation of urinary eosinophils

H L Corwin  1 , R A Bray, M H Haber
Affiliations
  • PMID: 2479358

The detection and interpretation of urinary eosinophils

H L Corwin et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989 Nov.

Abstract

We determined the clinical diagnosis for 183 patients who had urine samples examined for the presence of eosinophils. Urine samples were examined with both Hansel's stain and Wright's stain. A total of 11% of these patients had eosinophils detected in the urine. A variety of clinical conditions were associated with eosinophiluria. Urinary tract infection and acute interstitial nephritis were most common, each accounting for 25% of the total patients with eosinophiluria. Eosinophiluria proved to be a good predictor of acute interstitial nephritis. Hansel's stain was superior to Wright's stain in detecting eosinophils in urine. In particular, Hansel's stain increased the sensitivity of eosinophiluria for acute interstitial nephritis (63% vs 25%) as well as its positive predictive value (50% vs 25%).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources