The impact of smoke-free legislation on fetal, infant and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
- PMID: 23408079
- PMCID: PMC3586104
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002261
The impact of smoke-free legislation on fetal, infant and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Abstract
Introduction: Second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure is estimated to kill 600 000 people worldwide annually. The WHO recommends that smoke-free indoor public environments are enforced through national legislation. Such regulations have been shown to reduce SHS exposure and, consequently, respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity. Evidence of particular health benefit in children is now emerging, including reductions in low birthweight deliveries, preterm birth and asthma exacerbations. We aim to comprehensively assess the impact of smoke-free legislation on fetal, infant and childhood outcomes. This can inform further development and implementation of global policy and strategies to reduce early life SHS exposure.
Methods: Two authors will search online databases (1975-present; no language restrictions) of published and unpublished/in-progress studies, and references and citations to articles of interest. We will consult experts in the field to identify additional studies. Studies should describe associations between comprehensive or partial smoking bans in public places and health outcomes among children (0-12 years): stillbirth, preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, perinatal mortality, congenital anomalies, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, upper and lower respiratory infections and wheezing disorders including asthma. The Cochrane Effectiveness Practice and Organisational Care (EPOC)-defined study designs are eligible. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane 7-domain-based evaluation for randomised and clinical trials, and EPOC criteria for quasiexperimental studies. Data will be extracted by two reviewers and presented in tabular and narrative form. Meta-analysis will be undertaken using random-effects models, and generic inverse variance analysis for adjusted effect estimates. We will report sensitivity analyses according to study quality and design characteristics, and subgroup analyses according to coverage of ban, age group and parental/maternal smoking status. Publication bias will be assessed.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethics assessment is not required.
Results: Will be presented in one manuscript. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42013003522.
Similar articles
-
Tobacco control policies and perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 22;5(9):e008398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008398. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26399572 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of expanding smoke-free policies beyond enclosed public places and workplaces on children's tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):e038234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038234. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 33077564 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet. 2014 May 3;383(9928):1549-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60082-9. Epub 2014 Mar 28. Lancet. 2014. PMID: 24680633 Review.
-
Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 04;2:CD005992. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub3. PMID: 20393945 Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: a global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group.Tob Control. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):s119-s128. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054389. Epub 2018 Jun 7. Tob Control. 2019. PMID: 29880598 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tobacco control policies and perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 22;5(9):e008398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008398. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26399572 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and infant mortality: a national quasi-experimental study.Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 13;5:13020. doi: 10.1038/srep13020. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 26268789 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and determinants of secondhand smoke exposure among women in Bangladesh, 2011.Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Jan;17(1):58-65. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu129. Epub 2014 Aug 14. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015. PMID: 25125322 Free PMC article.
-
An international smoking ban-how many lives will be saved?Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014 Jun;16(6):418. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0418-0. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014. PMID: 24771033 Review.
References
-
- WHO WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic. Implementing smoke-free environments, Geneva, Switzerland: 2009
-
- Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, et al. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet 2011;377:139–46 - PubMed
-
- WHO Protection from exposure to second-hand smoke. Geneva, Switzerland: Policy recommendations, 2007
-
- Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, et al. Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(4):CD005992. - PubMed
-
- Reijula JP, Johnsson TS, Kaleva PS, et al. Exposure to tobacco smoke and prevalence of symptoms decreased among Finnish restaurant workers after the smoke-free law. Am J Ind Med 2012;55:37–43 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources