iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23170237
Effects of motivation on reward and attentional networks: an fMRI study - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;2(6):741-53.
doi: 10.1002/brb3.80. Epub 2012 Sep 23.

Effects of motivation on reward and attentional networks: an fMRI study

Affiliations

Effects of motivation on reward and attentional networks: an fMRI study

Iliyan Ivanov et al. Brain Behav. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Existing evidence suggests that reward and attentional networks function in concert and that activation in one system influences the other in a reciprocal fashion; however, the nature of these influences remains poorly understood. We therefore developed a three-component task to assess the interaction effects of reward anticipation and conflict resolution on the behavioral performance and the activation of brain reward and attentional systems. Sixteen healthy adult volunteers aged 21-45 years were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing the task. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with cue (reward vs. non-reward) and target (congruent vs. incongruent) as within-subjects factors was used to test for main and interaction effects. Neural responses to anticipation, conflict, and reward outcomes were tested. Behaviorally there were main effects of both reward cue and target congruency on reaction time. Neuroimaging results showed that reward anticipation and expected reward outcomes activated components of the attentional networks, including the inferior parietal and occipital cortices, whereas surprising non-rewards activated the frontoinsular cortex bilaterally and deactivated the ventral striatum. In turn, conflict activated a broad network associated with cognitive control and motor functions. Interaction effects showed decreased activity in the thalamus, anterior cingulated gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus bilaterally when difficult conflict trials (e.g., incongruent targets) were preceded by reward cues; in contrast, the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex showed greater activation during congruent targets preceded by reward cues. These results suggest that reward anticipation is associated with lower activation in attentional networks, possibly due to increased processing efficiency, whereas more difficult, conflict trials are associated with lower activity in regions of the reward system, possibly because such trials are experienced as less rewarding.

Keywords: Attention; brain reward system; fMRI; motivation; neuroimaging; neuroscience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Anticipation, conflict, and reward task. This schematic shows the temporal relationship between the cue, target, and outcome components of the ACR task. Sixty-four reward cues (blue circle) and 64 non-reward cues (yellow circle), as well as 64 congruent targets and 64 incongruent targets are randomly presented during the four sessions of the task. The outcome is performance dependent: subjects must respond as quickly as possible by pushing a button with their left or right index finger that corresponds to the direction of the to the center arrow of the flanker. If the response is correct, there is 50% chance of reward in the amount of $1 (green square); slow and/or incorrect responses result in $1 loss (red square). In non-rewarding trials the reward is omitted.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Behavior results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Activation during reward components of the ACR task. Statistical parametric maps in axial views showing significant blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal changes. (A) BOLD signal increase in the left putamen generated by the reward–non-reward cue contrast. (B) BOLD signal increase and the left parietal cortex generated by the reward–non-reward cue contrast. (C) BOLD signal decreases in the left ventral striatum generated by surprising non-reward–expected non-reward outcome contrasts. (D) BOLD signal increase in the right insula generated by the surprising non-reward–expected non-reward outcome contrast. The figures were thresholded at P < 0.05 (corrected); the color bar indicates color-coded significance of the t-test values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Activation during cognitive conflict component of the ACR task. (A) BOLD signal increase in the right inferior frontal gyrus generated by incongruent–congruent flanker contrasts. (B) BOLD signal increase and the right middle temporal cortex generated by incongruent–congruent flanker contrasts. (C) BOLD signal increase in the left thalamus generated by incongruent–congruent flanker contrasts. (D) BOLD signal increase in the left supplemental motor area generated by incongruent–congruent flanker contrasts. The figures were thresholded at P < 0.05 (corrected); the color bar indicates color-coded significance of the t-test values.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Activation during expected reward component of the ACR task. (A) BOLD signal increase in the left parietal cortex generated by reward–expected non-reward outcome contrasts. (B) BOLD signal increase and the left lingual cortex generated by reward–expected non-reward outcome contrasts. (C) BOLD signal increase in the right parietal cortex generated by reward–expected non-reward outcome contrasts. (D) BOLD signal increase in the right inferior frontal gyrus generated by reward–expected non-reward outcome contrasts. The figures were thresholded at P < 0.05 (corrected); the color bar indicates color-coded significance of the t-test values.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Anticipation × Cognitive Conflict interactions estimated percent change in the BOLD signal during congruent and incongruent flankers of the ACR task in relation to the preceding cue (i.e., reward vs. non-reward) in (A) right orbitofrontal gyrus and left ventral striatum, and (B) right middle frontal gyrus and right anterior cingulate cortex, and (C) left middle frontal gyrus and the right thalamus. The SPMs were thresholded at P < 0.01; the color bar indicates color-coded significance of the t-test values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beck SM, Locke HS, Savine AC, Jimura K, Braver TS. Primary and secondary rewards differentially modulate neural activity dynamics during working memory. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bendiksby M, Platt M. Neural correlates of reward and attention in macaque area LIP. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:2411–2420. - PubMed
    1. Bjork J, Hommer D. Anticipating instrumentally obtained and passively-received rewards: a factorial fMRI investigation. Behav. Brain Res. 2007;177:165–170. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botvinick MM, Huffstetler S, McGuire JT. Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens. Cogn. Affect Behav. Neurosci. 2009;9:16–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown J. Conflict effects without conflict in anterior cingulate cortex: multiple response effects and context specific representations. Neuroimage. 2009;47:334–341. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources