iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22884409
Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in cardiovascular disease prevention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Dec;23(8):745-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in cardiovascular disease prevention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hsin-Ta Yang  1 , Meng Lee, Keun-Sik Hong, Bruce Ovbiagele, Jeffrey L Saver
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of folic acid supplementation in cardiovascular disease prevention: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hsin-Ta Yang et al. Eur J Intern Med. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: In observational studies, lower serum homocysteine levels are associated with a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded mixed findings regarding the efficacy of therapeutic homocysteine in lowering cardiovascular risk. Our aim was to perform an updated meta-analysis of relevant RCTs to assess the efficacy of folic acid supplementation in the prevention of CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke.

Methods: We performed systematic search to identify RCTs reported at least one of the CVD, CHD, or stroke as outcomes. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval was used as a measure of the association between folic acid supplementation and risk of CVD, CHD, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The analysis was further stratified by factors that could affect the treatment effects.

Results: The systematic search identified 26 RCTs enrolling 58,804 participants. Pooling the RRs showed that folic acid supplementation was not associated with any significant change in the risk of CVD (RR 0.98, 0.95 to 1.02; p=0.36), CHD (RR 1.03, 0.98 to 1.08; p=0.23), and all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 0.96 to 1.04; p=0.92), but was linked to a decreasing trend in stroke risk (RR 0.93, 0.86 to 1.00; p=0.05). In stratified analyses, the only heterogeneity was found for stroke risk reduction among groups with (RR 1.07, 0.92 to 1.25) vs. without (RR 0.88, 0.81 to 0.96) mandatory grain fortification (P for heterogeneity=0.03).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that there might be a potentially modest benefit of folic acid supplementation in stroke prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources