iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19855009/
Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19126-31.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition

Michael Richter  1 , Ramon Rosselló-Móra
Affiliations

Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition

Michael Richter et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) has been used for nearly 50 years as the gold standard for prokaryotic species circumscriptions at the genomic level. It has been the only taxonomic method that offered a numerical and relatively stable species boundary, and its use has had a paramount influence on how the current classification has been constructed. However, now, in the era of genomics, DDH appears to be an outdated method for classification that needs to be substituted. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between two genomes seems the most promising method since it mirrors DDH closely. Here we examine the work package JSpecies as a user-friendly, biologist-oriented interface to calculate ANI and the correlation of the tetranucleotide signatures between pairwise genomic comparisons. The results agreed with the use of ANI to substitute DDH, with a narrowed boundary that could be set at approximately 95-96%. In addition, the JSpecies package implemented the tetranucleotide signature correlation index, an alignment-free parameter that generally correlates with ANI and that can be of help in deciding when a given pair of organisms should be classified in the same species. Moreover, for taxonomic purposes, the analyses can be produced by simply randomly sequencing at least 20% of the genome of the query strains rather than obtaining their full sequence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Plotted results of ANIb versus ANIm. The triangles show those values that correspond to what taxonomists consider as “true” species according to the DDH values traditionally applied and that have previously been classified. Inset shows the regression lines of the pairwise comparisons of ANIb or ANIm values with their corresponding percentage of aligned stretches (percentage of nucleotides included in the study).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Plotted values of DDH versus ANIm. Triangles show values that correspond to what taxonomists consider as “true” species according to the DDH values traditionally applied and that have previously been classified. Squares indicate values that appear to be in the transition zone.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Plotted values of TETRA versus ANIm. Triangles show those values that correspond to what taxonomists consider as “true” species according to the DDH values traditionally applied and that have previously been classified. Squares indicate values that appear to be in the transition zone. Note that this is an enlarged (zoomed) portion of the graphic, and values <80% ANI and 0.90 TETRA have been skipped.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rosselló-Móra R. Updating prokaryotic taxonomy. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:6255–6257. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konstantinidis KT, Ramette A, Tiedje JM. The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Phil Trans Soc B. 2006;361:1929–1940. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25:39–67. - PubMed
    1. Stackebrandt E, Frederiksen W, Garrity GM, Grimont PAD, Kämpfer P, et al. Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1043–1047. - PubMed
    1. Wayne L, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O, et al. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1987;37:463–464.

Publication types