iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18462999
A framework and model for evaluating clinical decision support architectures - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;41(6):982-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 Mar 25.

A framework and model for evaluating clinical decision support architectures

Adam Wright  1 , Dean F Sittig
Affiliations

A framework and model for evaluating clinical decision support architectures

Adam Wright et al. J Biomed Inform. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a four-phase model for evaluating architectures for clinical decision support that focuses on: defining a set of desirable features for a decision support architecture; building a proof-of-concept prototype; demonstrating that the architecture is useful by showing that it can be integrated with existing decision support systems and comparing its coverage to that of other architectures. We apply this framework to several well-known decision support architectures, including Arden Syntax, GLIF, SEBASTIAN, and SAGE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: A portion of the architecture described here is based on work done by the Markle Foundation. Subsequent to completing this research, Author Wright was retained by the Markle Foundation in a consulting role on issues relating to Population Health.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of rules in a large clinical decision support knowledge base that could be represented in evaluated decision support architectures and formalisms.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Balas EA, Weingarten S, Garb CT, Blumenthal D, Boren SA, Brown GD. Improving preventive care by prompting physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Feb 14;160(3):301–308. - PubMed
    1. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Jama. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458–1465. - PubMed
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Jama. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1223–1238. - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. - PubMed
    1. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Jama. 1998 Oct 21;280(15):1339–1346. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources