Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome
- PMID: 18410651
- PMCID: PMC2344123
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01700.x
Survey of prenatal screening policies in Europe for structural malformations and chromosome anomalies, and their impact on detection and termination rates for neural tube defects and Down's syndrome
Abstract
Objective: To 'map' the current (2004) state of prenatal screening in Europe.
Design: (i) Survey of country policies and (ii) analysis of data from EUROCAT (European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies) population-based congenital anomaly registers.
Setting: Europe.
Population: Survey of prenatal screening policies in 18 countries and 1.13 million births in 12 countries in 2002-04.
Methods: (i) Questionnaire on national screening policies and termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) laws in 2004. (ii) Analysis of data on prenatal detection and termination for Down's syndrome and neural tube defects (NTDs) using the EUROCAT database.
Main outcome measures: Existence of national prenatal screening policies, legal gestation limit for TOPFA, prenatal detection and termination rates for Down's syndrome and NTD.
Results: Ten of the 18 countries had a national country-wide policy for Down's syndrome screening and 14/18 for structural anomaly scanning. Sixty-eight percent of Down's syndrome cases (range 0-95%) were detected prenatally, of which 88% resulted in termination of pregnancy. Eighty-eight percent (range 25-94%) of cases of NTD were prenatally detected, of which 88% resulted in termination. Countries with a first-trimester screening policy had the highest proportion of prenatally diagnosed Down's syndrome cases. Countries with no official national Down's syndrome screening or structural anomaly scan policy had the lowest proportion of prenatally diagnosed Down's syndrome and NTD cases. Six of the 18 countries had a legal gestational age limit for TOPFA, and in two countries, termination of pregnancy was illegal at any gestation.
Conclusions: There are large differences in screening policies between countries in Europe. These, as well as organisational and cultural factors, are associated with wide country variation in prenatal detection rates for Down's syndrome and NTD.
Similar articles
-
Sex chromosome trisomies in Europe: prevalence, prenatal detection and outcome of pregnancy.Eur J Hum Genet. 2011 Feb;19(2):231-4. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.148. Epub 2010 Aug 25. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011. PMID: 20736977 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining variation in Down's syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 25;14:437. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-437. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25257793 Free PMC article.
-
A population-based evaluation of the impact of antenatal screening for Down's syndrome in France, 1981-2000.BJOG. 2004 May;111(5):485-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00117.x. BJOG. 2004. PMID: 15104615 Free PMC article.
-
Paper 2: EUROCAT public health indicators for congenital anomalies in Europe.Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011 Mar;91 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S16-22. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20776. Epub 2011 Mar 4. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2011. PMID: 21381186 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prenatal biochemical screening for Down's syndrome and neural tube defects.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Apr;4(2):302-7. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1373963 Review.
Cited by
-
The expressivist argument for recent policy changes regarding the provision of prenatal testing in Japan.Glob Bioeth. 2024 Sep 2;35(1):2398299. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2024.2398299. eCollection 2024. Glob Bioeth. 2024. PMID: 39228857 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal Mortality Disparities by Gestational Age in European Countries.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2424226. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24226. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39110462 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Social Determinants in Diagnosis Timing for Fetal Care Center-Eligible Conditions: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;14(14):1503. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141503. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39061640 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The status and influencing factors of abnormal fetal pregnancy outcomes in 265 cases in China: a retrospective study.PeerJ. 2024 Apr 26;12:e17284. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17284. eCollection 2024. PeerJ. 2024. PMID: 38685940 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of Chinese maternal and child health professionals toward termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a cross-sectional survey.Front Public Health. 2023 Sep 7;11:1189266. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189266. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37744514 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. J Med Screen. 1997;4:181–246. - PubMed
-
- Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Bukowski R, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2001–11. - PubMed
-
- Wald NJ, Watt HC, Hackshaw AK. Integrated screening for Down's syndrome on the basis of tests performed during the first and second trimesters. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:461–7. - PubMed
-
- Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson JL, Pergament E, Silver R, Filkins K, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1405–13. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical