iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12917976
Occupational therapy for multiple sclerosis - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2003;2003(3):CD003608.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003608.

Occupational therapy for multiple sclerosis

E M J Steultjens  1 , J Dekker, L M Bouter, M Cardol, J C M Van de Nes, C H M Van den Ende
Affiliations
Review

Occupational therapy for multiple sclerosis

E M J Steultjens et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003.

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are referred to occupational therapy with complaints about fatigue, limb weakness, alteration of upper extremity fine motor coordination, loss of sensation and spasticity that causes limitations in performance of activities of daily living and social participation. The primary purpose of occupational therapy is to enable individuals to participate in self-care, work and leisure activities that they want or need to perform.

Objectives: To determine whether occupational therapy interventions in MS patients improve outcome on functional ability, social participation and/or health related quality of life.

Search strategy: Relevant full length articles were identified by electronical searches in Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Amed, Scisearch and The Cochrane MS Group Trials Register. The reference list of identified studies and reviews were examined for additional references. Date of last search: December 2002.

Selection criteria: Controlled (randomized and non-randomized) and other than controlled studies addressing occupational therapy for MS patients were eligible for inclusion.

Data collection and analysis: The methodological quality of the included trials was independently assessed by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. A list proposed by Van Tulder et al. (Van Tulder 1997) was used to assess the methodological quality. For outcome measures, standardized mean differences were calculated. The results were analysed using a best-evidence synthesis based on type of design, methodological quality and the significant findings of outcome and/or process measures.

Main results: Only one randomized clinical trial was identified. Two other included studies were a controlled clinical trial and a study with a pre-post test design. The studies included 271 patients in total. Two studies evaluated an energy-conservation course for groups of patients and one study evaluated a counselling intervention. The results of the energy conservation studies could be biased because of the designs used, the poor methodological quality and the small number of included patients. The high quality RCT on counselling reported non-significant results.

Reviewer's conclusions: On basis of this review no conclusions can be stated whether occupational therapy improves outcome in MS patients. The lack of (randomized controlled) efficacy studies in most intervention categories of OT shows an urgent need for future research in occupational therapy for multiple sclerosis. Initially, a survey of occupational therapy practice for MS patients including the characteristics and needs of these patients is necessary to develop a research agenda for efficacy studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known to the authors.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Mathiowetz 2001 {published data only}
    1. Mathiowetz V, Matuska KM, Murphy ME. Efficacy of an energy conservation course for persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2001;82(4):449‐56. - PubMed
O'Hara 2002 {published data only}
    1. O'Hara L, Cadbury H, Souza L, Ide L. Evaluation of the effectiveness of professionally guided self‐care for people with multiple sclerosis living in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2002;16(2):119‐28. - PubMed
Vanage 2003 {published data only}
    1. Vanage SM, Gilbertson KK, Mathiowetz V. Effects of an energy conservation course on fatigue impact for persons with progressive multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2003;57(3):315‐23. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Aisen 1993 {published data only}
    1. Aisen ML, Arnold A, Baiges I, Maxwell S, Rosen M. The effect of mechanical damping loads on disabling action tremor. Neurology 1993;43(7):1346‐50. - PubMed
Bowcher 1998 {published data only}
    1. Bowcher H, May M. Occupational therapy for the management of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998;61(11):488‐92.
Morris 1991 {published data only}
    1. Morris PA. A habituation approach to treating vertigo in Occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1991;45(6):556‐8. - PubMed

Additional references

Baker 2001
    1. Baker NA, Tickle‐Degnen L. The effectiveness of physical, psychological, and functional interventions in treating clients with multiple sclerosis: a meta‐analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 2001;55(3):324‐31. - PubMed
Clarke 2003
    1. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Analysing and presenting results. Cochrane Reviewers Handbook 4.1.6; Section 8. In: The Cochrane Library [database on disk and CDROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Oxford: Update Software; 2003.
Di Fabio 1997
    1. Fabio RP, Choi T, Soderberg J, Hansen CR. Health related quality of life for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: influence of rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 1997;77(12):1704‐16. - PubMed
Driessen 1997
    1. Driessen MJ, Dekker J, Lankhorst GJ, Zee J. Occupational therapy for patients with chronic diseases. Disability and Rehabilitation 1997;19(5):198‐204. - PubMed
Feigenson 1981
    1. Feigenson JS, Scheinberg L, Catalano RN, Polkow L, Mantegazza PM, Feigenson WD, et al. The cost‐effectiveness of multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: a model. Neurology 1981;31(10):1316‐22. - PubMed
Freeman 1997
    1. Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 1997;42(2):236‐44. - PubMed
Ko Ko 1999
    1. Ko Ko C. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation 1999;13 Suppl (1):33‐41. - PubMed
Moher 1996
    1. Moher D, Jadad AR, Tugwell P. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1996;12(2):195‐208. - PubMed
Moorer 2000
    1. Moorer P, Suurmeijer ThPBM, Zwanikken CP. Health care utilization by people with multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands: results of two separate studies. Disability and Rehabilitation 2000;22(16):695‐701. - PubMed
Richer 1999
    1. Richer CB, Bhasin CA. Occupational therapy practice guidelines for adults with neurodegenerative disease. Bethesda Maryland: AOTA, 1999.
Sliwa 1998
    1. Sliwa JA, Cohen BA. Multiple sclerosis. In: Delisa JA, Gans BM editor(s). Rehabilitation Medicine: principles and practice. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott‐Raven, 1998:1241‐57.
Tipping 1994
    1. Tipping L. Multiple Sclerosis. In: Turner A, Foster M, Johnson SE editor(s). Occupational therapy and physical dysfunction. 4th Edition. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1994:497‐512.
Van Tulder 1997
    1. Tulder MW, Assendelft WJJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration back review group for spinal disorders. Spine 1997;22(20):2323‐30. - PubMed
Van Tulder 2002
    1. Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B, Lao L, Koes BW. Accupuncture for low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.] - PubMed
Verhagen 1998
    1. Verhagen AP, Vet HCW, Bie RA, Kessels AGH, Boers M, Bouter LM, et al. The delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by delphi consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998;51(12):1235‐41. - PubMed
Wells 2000
    1. Wells GA, Shea B, OConnell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Tugwell P. The Newcastle‐Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non‐randomized studies in meta‐analyses. Proceedings of the 3rd symposium on systematic reviews. 2000:The instrument with the manual can be found on www.lri.ca.

MeSH terms