iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10479830
Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1999 Jul;27(4):726-40.
doi: 10.3758/bf03211565.

Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals

R M Byrne  1 , A Tasso
Affiliations

Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals

R M Byrne et al. Mem Cognit. 1999 Jul.

Abstract

We compared reasoners' inferences from conditionals based on possibilities in the present or the past (e.g., "If Linda had been in Dublin then Cathy would have been in Galway") with their inferences based on facts in the present or the past (e.g., "If Linda was in Dublin then Cathy was in Galway"). We propose that people construct a richer representation of conditionals that deal with possibilities rather than facts: Their models make explicit not only the suppositional case, in which Linda is in Dublin and Cathy is in Galway, but also the presupposed case, in which Linda is not in Dublin and Cathy is not in Galway. We report the results of four experiments that corroborate this model theory. The experiments show that reasoners make more inferences from conditionals based on possibilities rather than on facts when the inferences depend on the presupposed case. The results also show that reasoners generate different situations to verify and falsify conditionals based on possibilities and facts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • Mental models in deductive reasoning.
    García-Madruga JA, Gutiérrez F, Carriedo N, Moreno S, Johnson-Laird PN. García-Madruga JA, et al. Span J Psychol. 2002 Nov;5(2):125-40. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600005904. Span J Psychol. 2002. PMID: 12428479
  • Counterfactual and prefactual conditionals.
    Byrne RM, Egan SM. Byrne RM, et al. Can J Exp Psychol. 2004 Jun;58(2):113-20. doi: 10.1037/h0085791. Can J Exp Psychol. 2004. PMID: 15285601 Clinical Trial.
  • Indicative and counterfactual 'only if' conditionals.
    Egan SM, García-Madruga JA, Byrne RM. Egan SM, et al. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Nov;132(3):240-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Aug 19. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009. PMID: 19695557
  • The probability of conditionals: A review.
    López-Astorga M, Ragni M, Johnson-Laird PN. López-Astorga M, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):1-20. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01938-5. Epub 2021 Jun 25. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022. PMID: 34173186 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Propositional reasoning by model.
    Johnson-Laird PN, Byrne RM, Schaeken W. Johnson-Laird PN, et al. Psychol Rev. 1992 Jul;99(3):418-39. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.99.3.418. Psychol Rev. 1992. PMID: 1365811 Review.
See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cognition. 1989 Apr;31(3):187-276 - PubMed
    1. Cogn Psychol. 1985 Oct;17(4):391-416 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Rev. 1994 Oct;101(4):711-24 - PubMed
    1. Cognition. 1983 Dec;15(1-3):155-87 - PubMed
    1. Cognition. 1997 Apr;63(1):1-28 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources