iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.
iBet uBet web content aggregator. Adding the entire web to your favor.



Link to original content: https://link.springer.com/doi/10.1007/s00221-008-1459-9
Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals | Experimental Brain Research Skip to main content
Log in

Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated temporal processing in profoundly deaf individuals by testing their ability to make temporal order judgments (TOJs) for pairs of visual stimuli presented at central or peripheral visual eccentricities. Ten profoundly deaf participants judged which of the two visual stimuli appearing on opposite sides of central fixation was delivered first. Stimuli were presented either symmetrically, at central or peripheral locations, or asymmetrically (i.e. one central and the other peripheral) at varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) using the method of constant stimuli. Two groups of hearing controls were also tested in this task: 10 hearing controls auditory-deprived during testing and 12 hearing controls who were not subjected to any deprivation procedure. Temporal order thresholds (i.e. just noticeable differences) and points of subjective simultaneity for the two visual stimuli did not differ between groups. However, faster discrimination responses were systematically observed in the deaf than in either group of hearing controls, especially when the first of the two stimuli appeared at peripheral locations. Contrary to some previous findings, our results show that a life-long auditory deprivation does not alter temporal processing abilities in the millisecond range. In fact, we show that deaf participants obtain similar temporal thresholds to hearing controls, while also responding much faster. This enhanced reactivity is documented here for the first time in the context of a temporal processing task, and we suggest it may constitute a critical aspect of the functional changes occurring as a consequence of profound deafness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allik J, Kreegipuu K (1998) Multiple visual latency. Psychol Sci 9:135–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arden GB, Weale RA (1954) Nervous mechanisms and dark-adaptation. J Physiol 125:417–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong BA, Neville HJ, Hillyard SA, Mitchell TV (2002) Auditory deprivation affects processing in motion, but not colour. Cogn Brain Res 14:422–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Neville H (2002) Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Neurosci 3:443–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Tomann A, Hutton C, Mitchell T, Corina D, Liu G, Neville H (2000) Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. J Neurosci 20(RC93):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Brozinsky C, Tomann A, Mitchell T, Corina D, Liu G (2001) Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization of motion processing. J Neurosci 21:8931–8942

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bavelier D, Dye MWG, Hauser PC (2006) Do deaf individuals see better? Trends Cogn Sci 10:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottari D, Turatto M, Bonfioli F, Abbadessa C, Selmi S, Beltrame MA, Pavani F (2008a). Change blindness in profound deaf individuals and cochlear implant recipients. Brain Res (in press)

  • Bottari D, Turatto M, Pavani F (2008b). Visual attention in the profoundly deaf: the peripheral advantage reconsidered (submitted)

  • Bross M, Sauerwein H (1980) Signal detection analysis of visual flicker in deaf and hearing individuals. Percept Mot Skills 51:839–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bross M, Harper D, Sics G (1980) Visual effects of auditory deprivation: common intermodal and intramodal factors. Science 207:667–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colmenero JM, Catena A, Fuentes LJ, Ramos MM (2004) Mechanisms of visuospatial orienting in deafness. Eur J Cogn Psychol 16:791–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finney EM, Dobkins KR (2001) Visual contrast sensitivity in deaf versus hearing populations: exploring the perceptual consequences of auditory deprivation and experience with a visual language. Brain Res 11:171–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heming JE, Brown LN (2005) Sensory temporal processing in adults with early hearing loss. Brain Cogn 59:173–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalska J, Szelag E (2006) The effect of congenital deafness on duration judgment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:946–953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kracke I (1975) Perception of rhythmic sequences by receptive aphasic and deaf children. Br J Disord Commun 10:43–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamme VAF, Roelfsema PR (2000) The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends Neurosci 23:571–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loke WH, Song S (1991) Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals. Bull Psychon Soc 29:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills CB (1985) Perception of visual temporal patterns of deaf and hearing adults. Bull Psychon Soc 23:483–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Morein-Zamir S, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A (2003) Auditory caption of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Cogn Brain Res 17:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ (1995) Developmental specificity in neurocognitive development in humans. In: Gazzaniga M (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 219–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ, Lawson DS (1987) Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res 405:268–283

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neville HJ, Schmidt A, Kutas M (1983) Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res 266:127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paradiso MA (2002) Perceptual and neuronal correspondence in primary visual cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:155–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parasnis I, Samar VJ (1985) Parafoveal attention in congenitally deaf and hearing young adults. Brain Cogn 4:313–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poizner H, Tallal P (1987) Temporal processing in deaf signers. Brain Lang 30:52–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Proksch J, Bavelier D (2002) Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness. J Cogn Neurosci 14:687–701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds HN (1993) Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects. Am J Psychol 106:523–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rileigh KK, Odom PB (1972) Perception of rhythm by subjects with normal and deficient hearing. Dev Psychol 7:54–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KA, Bavelier D (2003) Components of visual prior entry. Cogn Psychol 47:333–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) What you see is what you hear. Nature 408:788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shore DI, Gray K, Spry E, Spence C (2005) Spatial modulation of tactile temporal-order judgments. Perception 34:1252–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sladen DP, Tharpe AM, Ashmead DH, Grantham DW, Chun MM (2005) Visual attention in deaf and normal hearing adults. Effects of stimulus compatibility. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:1529–1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AP (1989) A review of the effects of noise on human performance. Scand J Psychol 30:185–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sterritt GM, Camp BW, Lipman BS (1966) Effects of early auditory deprivation upon auditory and visual information processing. Percept Mot Skills 23:123–130

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens C, Neville H (2006) Neuroplasticity as a double-edged sword: deaf enhancement and dyslexic deficits in motion processing. J Cogn Neurosci 18:701–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trimmel M, Poelzl G (2006) Impact of background noise on reaction time and brain DC potentials changes of VDT-based spatial attention. Ergonomics 49:202–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vatakis A, Navarra J, Soto-Faraco S, Spence C (2007) Audiovisual temporal adaptation of speech: temporal order versus simultaneity judgments. Exp Brain Res 185:521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer G, McKee SP (1977) Perception of temporal order in adjacent visual stimuli. Vision Res 17:887–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood HA, Wood DJ, Kingsmill MC, French JRW, Howarth SP (1984) The mathematical achievements of deaf children from different educational environments. Br J Educ Psychol 54:254–264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all deaf participants who generously volunteered their time in this study. We thank Brunella Grigolli (Ente Nazionale Sordi, Trento) for coordinating deaf recruiting. We also thank Andrea Vilardi and Massimo Vescovi for helping in data analysis and one anonymous reviewer for suggesting the addition of the auditory-deprived control group. F·P. was supported by a PRIN 2006 grant (Prot. 2006118540_004) from Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca (Italy), and by a grant form Commune di Rovereto (Italy). M.Z. was supported by a returning grant ‘Rientro dei cervelli’ from the MURST (Italy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Pavani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nava, E., Bottari, D., Zampini, M. et al. Visual temporal order judgment in profoundly deaf individuals. Exp Brain Res 190, 179–188 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1459-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1459-9

Keywords

Navigation