Abstract
This article starts from the premise that human judgment is intrinsically linked with learning and adaptation in complex sociotechnological environments. Under the illusory veneer of retaining control over algorithmic reckoning, we are concerned that algorithmic reckoning may substitute human judgment in decision-making and thereby change morality in fundamental, perhaps irreversible ways. We present an ontological critique of artificially intelligent algorithms to show what is going on “under their hood,” especially in cases when human morality is already co-constituted with algorithmic reckoning. We advance a twofold call for (in)action. First, we offer a call for inaction as far as the substitution of judgment for reckoning through our teaching in business schools and beyond is concerned. Second, we advance a reinvigorated call for action—in particular, to teach more pragmatist judgment in our curricula across subjects to foster social life (rather than stifle it through algorithmic reckoning).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139-155 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Academy of Management Learning and Education |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 15 Mar 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2022 |