Birgeria
Birgeria | |
---|---|
Fossil of Birgeria acuminata, Civic Museum of Natural Science, Bergamo, Italy.[2] | |
Scientific classification | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Chordata |
Class: | Actinopterygii |
Order: | †Birgeriiformes Heyler, 1969 |
Family: | †Birgeriidae Aldinger, 1937 |
Genus: | †Birgeria Stensiö, 1919 |
Type species | |
†Saurichthys mougeoti Agassiz, 1844
| |
Species[1] | |
See text | |
Synonyms | |
|
Birgeria is a genus of carnivorous marine ray-finned fish from the Triassic period.[3] Birgeria had a global distribution, with fossil known from Madagascar, Spitsbergen, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Slovenia, China, Russia, Canada and Nevada, United States. The oldest fossils are from Griesbachian aged beds of the Wordie Creek Formation of East Greenland.[4] Birgeria existed throughout the entire Triassic period, from the very beginning just after the Permian-Triassic mass extinction, up to the very end with its extinction during the Triassic-Jurassic mass extinction.
The type species was first described as Saurichthys mougeoti. Following a reinvestigation, Erik Stensiö concluded that this species cannot be ascribed to Saurichthys. He thus erected a new genus, which he named after his colleague Birger Sjöström, who had joined him on an expedition to the Arctic island of Spitsbergen (Svalbard) in 1915.[5]
Systematics
[edit]Birgeria is the only genus of the family Birgeriidae and order Birgeriformes.[3][6] The genera Psilichthys, Ohmdenia and Brazilichthys have been previously referred to Birgeriidae, but they were shown to be only distantly related to Birgeria.[3][7][8] The family was erected by Hermann Aldinger in 1937. Eigil Nielsen gave the first diagnosis of Birgeriidae in his 1949 monograph. Birgeriidae first appears in the Early Triassic (Induan) of Greenland and went extinct in the Late Triassic. It was most speciose during the Early and Middle Triassic.[1]
In most cladistic analyses, Birgeria and the Saurichthyiformes are recovered as each others' closest relatives.[9] Together, they are also often recovered as stem chondrosteans, closely related to sturgeons and paddlefish (Acipenseriformes), with their exact relationship to each other and to sturgeons/paddlefish varying depending on the study.[10][11][12][13] However, other studies have suggested that they are not closely related to Acipenseriformes, and instead are part of the stem-group of Actinopterygii, and thus are not closely related to any living group of fish.[9][14]
A few species, such as Birgeria? costata or Birgeria? annulata, are only known from fragmentary material. Their affinity with Birgeria is uncertain. The type material of Birgeria guizhouensis appears to be lost.[15] A jaw fragment from the Late Triassic of California, described as Xenestes velox by David Starr Jordan, was tentatively synonymized with Birgeria. With about eight valid species, Birgeria was much less speciose than Saurichthys.
The following species are known:[6][1]
- †B. acuminata (Agassiz, 1843) - Middle Triassic (Anisian) of India, Late Triassic (Carnian to Rhaetian) of Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom)
- †B. aldingeri Schwarz, 1970 - Early Triassic (Olenekian) of Norway
- †B. americana Romano et al., 2017 - Olenekian of Nevada, US
- †B.? costata (Münster, 1839 ) - Middle Triassic (Anisian to Ladinian) of Germany
- †B. groenlandica Stensiö, 1932 - Earliest Triassic (Induan) of Greenland
- †B. guizhouensis? Liu et al, 2006 - Carnian of China
- †B. liui Jin, 2001 - Ladinian to Carnian of China
- †B. mougeoti (Agassiz, 1844) - Induan to Olenekian of France and Svalbard
- †B. nielseni Lehman, 1948 - Induan of Madagascar
- †B. stensioei Aldinger, 1931 - Anisian of Italy
- †B.? velox (Jordan, 1907) - Carnian/Norian of California, US
Fossils of indeterminate species are known from Canada (British Columbia), Bolivia, Luxembourg, and Saudi Arabia.[6]
Appearance
[edit]The scale cover of Birgeria is reduced. Most of the body is devoid of scales. Scales are only developed on the upper lobe of the caudal fin and the hind portion of the caudal peduncle. The scales are small, rhombic and lack a ganoine layer.
The heterocercal tail fin is large and deeply forked. The dorsal and anal fins are situated at the same level in the back of the body. The fin rays are segmented.
The eyes were located in the front of the skull. The jaws are long and the gape is large. The "parietals" (postparietals) are small and medially separated by the elongate "frontals" (parietals). The postrostral is large. The (rostro-)premaxilla is unpaired. The maxilla is cleaver-shaped with a large postorbital blade. Two to three rows of conical teeth are present. The teeth normally show cutting edges. The preopercle is boomerang-shaped. The bones of the gill cover are small, often weakly ossified or not ossified at all.
The axial skeleton consists of ossified neural and haemal arches, both of which may show spines, and additional supraneurals. Other elements are interpreted as parapophyses. Ossified centra are missing.[15] The axial skeleton is regionalized, meaning that there are differences in bone morphology between segments of the axial skeleton, although these differences are relatively subtle in Birgeria.[16]
Ecology
[edit]Birgeria was an apex predator among Triassic ray-finned fish, together with Saurichthys.
Most species of Birgeria grew over 1 metre (3.3 ft) in length, some even up to 2 metres (6.6 ft) or possibly more. Some of the largest species are the Early Triassic Birgeria aldingeri (Spitsbergen) and Birgeria americana (Nevada). They were the first large-bodied predators after the Permian-Triassic mass extinction.[1]
A specimen of Birgeria nielseni from Madagascar was described as supposedly carrying embryos whose bodies are covered with rhombic scales. However, this interpretation was later dismissed.[18] It is more likely that these "embryos" were actually preyed ray-fins, which would indicate that the diet of Birgeria included small actinopterygians. Unlike Saurichthys, Birgeria was probably not viviparous. This view is supported by the fact that fossils with copulatory organs are yet unknown.
Based on its anatomical features, Birgeria is interpreted as a pelagic, swift swimmer. Fossils are sparse, which supports the view that it lived offshore.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Romano, Carlo; Jenks, James F.; Jattiot, Romain; Scheyer, Torsten M.; Bylund, Kevin G.; Bucher, Hugo (2017). "Marine Early Triassic Actinopterygii from Elko County (Nevada, USA): implications for the Smithian equatorial vertebrate eclipse". Journal of Paleontology. 91 (5): 1025–1046. Bibcode:2017JPal...91.1025R. doi:10.1017/jpa.2017.36. S2CID 134496299.
- ^ Stefani, Marco; Arduini, Paolo; Garassino, Alessandro; Pinna, Giovanni; Teruzzi, Giorgio; Trombetta, Gian Luigi (1992). "Palaeoenvironment of extraordinary fossil biotas from the Upper Triassic of Italy". Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. 132 (24): 309–335.
- ^ a b c Romano, C. & Brinkmann, W. (2009). "Reappraisal of the lower actinopterygian Birgeria stensioei ALDINGER, 1931 (Osteichthyes; Birgeriidae) from the Middle Triassic of Monte San Giorgio (Switzerland) and Besano (Italy)". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 252: 17–31. doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2009/0252-0017.
- ^ Nielsen, Eigil (1949). "Studies on Triassic fishes from East Greenland 2. Australosomus and Birgeria". Palaeozoologica Groenlandica. 3: 1–309..
- ^ Stensiö, Erik (1919). "Einige Bemerkungen über die systematische Stellung von Saurichthys mougeoti Agassiz". Senckenbergiana. 1: 177–181..
- ^ a b c "Birgeria". Paleobiology Database.
- ^ Figueroa, Rodrigo T.; Friedman, Matt; Gallo, Valéria (2019). "Cranial anatomy of the predatory actinopterygian Brazilichthys macrognathus from the Permian (Cisuralian) Pedra de Fogo Formation, Parnaíba Basin, Brazil". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 39 (3): e1639722. Bibcode:2019JVPal..39E9722F. doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1639722. S2CID 92614261.
- ^ Friedman, M. (2012). "Parallel evolutionary trajectories underlie the origin of the giant suspension-feeding whales and bony fish". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 279 (1730): 944–951. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1381. PMC 3259929. PMID 21849314.
- ^ a b Argyriou, Thodoris; Giles, Sam; Friedman, Matt; Romano, Carlo; Kogan, Ilja; Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. (2018-11-01). "Internal cranial anatomy of Early Triassic species of †Saurichthys (Actinopterygii: †Saurichthyiformes): implications for the phylogenetic placement of †saurichthyiforms". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 18 (1): 161. Bibcode:2018BMCEE..18..161A. doi:10.1186/s12862-018-1264-4. ISSN 1471-2148. PMC 6211452. PMID 30382811.
- ^ Gardiner, B.G.; Schaeffer, B. & Masserie, J.A. (2005). "A review of the lower actinopterygian phylogeny". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 144 (4): 511–525. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2005.00181.x.
- ^ Wu, Feixiang; Chang, Mee-mann; Sun, Yuanlin; Xu, Guanghui (2013-12-04). "A New Saurichthyiform (Actinopterygii) with a Crushing Feeding Mechanism from the Middle Triassic of Guizhou (China)". PLOS ONE. 8 (12): e81010. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...881010W. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081010. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3852010. PMID 24324657.
- ^ Near, Thomas J; Thacker, Christine E (18 April 2024). "Phylogenetic classification of living and fossil ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii)". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History. 65. doi:10.3374/014.065.0101.
- ^ Tsessarsky, A. A. (2022-12-01). "Origin and Diversification of Acipenseriforms". Journal of Ichthyology. 62 (7): 1361–1380. doi:10.1134/S0032945222060297. ISSN 1555-6425.
- ^ Giles, Sam; Feilich, Kara; Warnock, Rachel C. M.; Pierce, Stephanie E.; Friedman, Matt (2022-11-17). "A Late Devonian actinopterygian suggests high lineage survivorship across the end-Devonian mass extinction". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7 (1): 10–19. Bibcode:2022NatEE...7...10G. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01919-4. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 36396970. S2CID 253626895.
- ^ a b Ni, P.; Tintori, A.; Sun, Z.; Lombardo, C. & Jiang, D. (2019). "Postcranial skeleton of Birgeria liui (Osteichthyes, Actinopterygii) from the Longobardian (Ladinian, Middle Triassic) of Xingyi, Guizhou, South China". Swiss Journal of Geosciences. 112 (2–3): 307–324. doi:10.1007/s00015-018-0329-0. S2CID 135305199.
- ^ Maxwell, E.E.; Romano, C. & Wu, F.-X. (2021). "Regional disparity in the axial skeleton of Saurichthyidae and implications for axial regionalization in non-teleostean actinopterygians". Journal of Zoology. 315: 29–41. doi:10.1111/jzo.12878.
- ^ Scheyer, Torsten M.; Romano, Carlo; Jenks, Jim; Bucher, Hugo (2014). "Early Triassic Marine Biotic Recovery: The Predators' Perspective"". PLOS ONE. 9 (3): e88987. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...988987S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088987. PMC 3960099. PMID 24647136.
- ^ Bürgin, Toni (1990). "Reproduction in Middle Triassic actinopterygians; complex fin structures and evidence of viviparity in fossil fishes". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 100 (4): 379–391. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1990.tb01866.x.
Further reading
[edit]- Fossils (Smithsonian Handbooks) by David Ward (Page 211)
- Prehistoric ray-finned fish genera
- Triassic fish of North America
- Triassic fish of Europe
- Triassic fish of Asia
- Triassic fish of Africa
- Late Triassic vertebrates of South America
- Early Triassic fish
- Middle Triassic fish
- Late Triassic fish
- Triassic bony fish
- Fossils of Austria
- Fossils of Belgium
- Fossils of Bolivia
- Fossils of British Columbia
- Fossils of California
- Fossils of China
- Fossils of England
- Fossils of Germany
- Fossils of Greenland
- Fossils of India
- Fossils of Italy
- Fossils of Luxembourg
- Fossils of Madagascar
- Fossils of Nevada
- Fossils of Norway
- Fossils of Poland
- Fossils of Saudi Arabia
- Fossils of Slovakia
- Fossils of Svalbard
- Fossils of Switzerland
- Induan genus first appearances
- Olenekian genera
- Anisian genera
- Ladinian genera
- Carnian genera
- Norian genera
- Rhaetian genus extinctions
- Fossil taxa described in 1919