- Split View
-
Views
-
Cite
Cite
Huichen Wang, Ange Ronel Perrault, Yoshihiko Takeda, Wei Qin, Hongyan Wang, George Iliakis, Biochemical evidence for Ku‐independent backup pathways of NHEJ, Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 31, Issue 18, 15 September 2003, Pages 5377–5388, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg728
- Share Icon Share
Abstract
Cells of higher eukaryotes process within minutes double strand breaks (DSBs) in their genome using a non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) apparatus that engages DNA‐PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4 and other as of yet unidentified factors. Although chemical inhibition, or mutation, in any of these factors delays processing, cells ultimately remove the majority of DNA DSBs using an alternative pathway operating with an order of magnitude slower kinetics. This alternative pathway is active in mutants deficient in genes of the RAD52 epistasis group and frequently joins incorrect ends. We proposed, therefore, that it reflects an alternative form of NHEJ that operates as a backup (B‐NHEJ) to the DNA‐PK‐dependent (D‐NHEJ) pathway, rather than homology directed repair of DSBs. The present study investigates the role of Ku in the coordination of these pathways using as a model end joining of restriction endonuclease linearized plasmid DNA in whole cell extracts. Efficient, error‐free, end joining observed in such in vitro reactions is strongly inhibited by anti‐Ku antibodies. The inhibition requires DNA‐PKcs, despite the fact that Ku efficiently binds DNA ends in the presence of antibodies, or in the absence of DNA‐PKcs. Strong inhibition of DNA end joining is also mediated by wortmannin, an inhibitor of DNA‐PKcs, in the presence but not in the absence of Ku, and this inhibition can be rescued by pre‐incubating the reaction with double stranded oligonucleotides. The results are compatible with a role of Ku in directing end joining to a DNA‐PK dependent pathway, mediated by efficient end binding and productive interactions with DNA‐PKcs. On the other hand, efficient end joining is observed in extracts of cells lacking DNA‐PKcs, as well as in Ku‐depleted extracts in line with the operation of alternative pathways. Extracts depleted of Ku and DNA‐PKcs rejoin blunt ends, as well as homologous ends with 3′ or 5′ protruding single strands with similar efficiency, but addition of Ku suppresses joining of blunt ends and homologous ends with 3′ overhangs. We propose that the affinity of Ku for DNA ends, particularly when cooperating with DNA‐PKcs, suppresses B‐NHEJ by quickly and efficiently binding DNA ends and directing them to D‐NHEJ for rapid joining. A chromatin‐based model of DNA DSB rejoining accommodating biochemical and genetic results is presented and deviations between in vitro and in vivo results discussed.
Received May 27, 2003; Revised and Accepted July 21, 2003
INTRODUCTION
Endogenous cellular processes and exogenous factors such as ionizing radiation (IR) can generate double strand breaks (DSB) in the DNA that undermine genomic integrity. Three enzymatically distinct processes, homology directed repair (HDR), single strand annealing (SSA) and non‐homologous end joining (NHEJ) can, in principle, repair DNA DSBs ( 1 – 4 ). In cells of higher eukaryotes, repair of IR‐induced DNA DSBs is dominated by a fast component operating with half times of the order of a few minutes. This form of rejoining is severely compromised by defects in any of the constituents of DNA‐PK, DNA‐PKcs and Ku ( 5 – 7 ). Very similar defects are also observed in cells defective in DNA ligase IV ( 8 ). Genetic, as well as a wealth of biochemical studies assign these proteins to the same end‐joining pathway, which is characterized by an ability to remove DNA DSBs from the genome with extremely fast kinetics. We proposed the term D‐NHEJ, for this pathway of DNA DSB rejoining.
Despite the prevalence of D‐NHEJ, reports by us and others indicate that cells with defects in components of either DNA‐PK, or DNA ligase IV complex are able to rejoin the majority of IR‐induced DNA DSBs utilizing an alternative pathway operating with 20–30‐fold slower kinetics ( 7 – 9 ). A slow pathway of DNA DSBs rejoining is frequently discernible in wild‐type cells as well, but it becomes well defined and assumes a dominant role when D‐NHEJ is compromised through defects in participating factors, or when inhibitors against DNA‐PK, such as wortmannin, are administered.
Because HDR is normally operating with kinetics of the order of hours, it is in principle possible that the slow component seen after inhibition of D‐NHEJ reflects this process. We tested this hypothesis using the hyper‐ recombinogenic DT40 chicken cell line and a set of mutants defective in homologous recombination (HR) ( 10 , 11 ). DT40 cells rejoin IR‐induced DNA DSBs with kinetics similar to those of other vertebrate cells displaying 1000‐fold lower levels of HR ( 6 ). In addition, knockouts of RAD51B , RAD52 and RAD54 rejoin DNA DSBs with kinetics similar to the wild type, as does also a conditional knock out mutant of RAD51 ( 6 ). While a significant reduction in the fast component of rejoining is observed in Ku70–/– DT40 cells, a double mutant Ku70–/–/RAD54–/– shows similar half times to Ku70–/– cells ( 6 ).
Thus, increases by several orders of magnitude in the capacity of cells to carry out HR, or defects in the proteins involved, fail to alter the rejoining kinetics in a way compatible with an involvement of HDR in the slow component of DNA DSBs rejoining, even when D‐NHEJ is severely compromised ( 6 ). Furthermore, rejoining of DNA DSBs with slow kinetics is associated with the joining of incorrect ends, an effect not compatible with the operation of HDR ( 12 ). To accommodate these observations, we hypothesized that the slow component of DNA DSBs rejoining reflects an alternative pathway of NHEJ, which we termed backup (initially basic), B‐NHEJ—to differentiate from D‐NHEJ. According to this model, at least two distinct NHEJ pathways cooperate to remove IR‐induced DNA DSBs from the genome of higher eukaryotes ( 6 , 9 , 13 )
We inquired whether biochemical studies utilizing as substrate plasmid DNA digested by a restriction endonuclease to generate different types of ends, and cellular extracts as a source of enzyme, can recapitulate aspects of the operation of the two pathways of DNA DSB rejoining. Here, we examine this possibility by studying the role of Ku in NHEJ using an in vitro plasmid‐based DNA end‐joining assay.
Ku is a heterodimer of 69 and 86 kDa polypeptides called Ku70 and Ku80, respectively ( 3 , 14 ). Ku has high affinity for binding to DNA ends without exhibiting sequence specificity and it is thought that Ku binding on DNA ends is protective against nuclease digestion ( 15 – 17 ). The crystal structure of Ku indicates that Ku70 and Ku80 fold in a similar fashion and bind to each other to generate an asymmetrical ring like structure with an aperture large enough to allow DNA to be threaded through ( 18 ). Ku transfers between DNA ends and translocates along the DNA in an ATP‐independent manner allowing several Ku dimers to bind on a single DNA molecule ( 19 – 21 ). The DNA‐PK activity is required for Ku to enter DNA when a Ku‐DNA‐PKcs complex assembles on DNA ends ( 22 ). As a regulatory subunit, Ku stimulates the DNA‐PK kinase activity by binding to DNA ends ( 23 , 24 ). Ku and DNA‐PKcs are thought to recruit other DNA repair proteins like XRCC4/ligase IV to DNA ends and to stimulate the DNA end joining by mammalian DNA ligases ( 25 – 27 ). Evidence has been presented that Ku is functioning as an alignment factor that brings and holds the DNA ends together to facilitate their metabolic restoration and rejoining ( 28 , 29 ). Ku also plays a critical role in telomere capping in mammalian cells ( 30 , 31 ) and yeast ( 32 , 33 ), and is involved in telomeric silencing ( 34 , 35 ). These diverse functions of Ku made it an appropriate initial focus for our studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and extract preparation
HeLa cells were grown either as monolayer or suspension cultures in Joklik’s modified MEM (S‐MEM) supplemented with 5% bovine calf serum. M059‐J cells were grown as monolayer cultures in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum. All experiments were performed with whole cell extract (WCE). For HeLa extract‐preparation a 1–30 l suspension of cells was grown in spinner flasks to 0.5–1 × 10 6 cells/ml and collected by centrifugation. For M059‐J extract‐preparation, 100 dishes (100 mm, 20 ml growth medium, 0.5 × 10 6 cells) were prepared and cells were allowed to grow to ∼4 × 10 6 cells/dish before harvesting by trypsinization. The very slow growth characteristics of M059K cells, the isogenic wild‐type control of M059J cells, made extract preparation difficult. Therefore, in this work HeLa cells are used as a wild‐type control for M059J cells. For further processing, cells from both cell lines were washed once in ice‐cold PBS and subsequently in five packed cell volumes of cold hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES, 5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 0.5 mM DTT). The cell pellet was resuspended in 2 vol of hypotonic buffer and, after 10 min in ice, disrupted in a Dounce homogenizer (15 strokes with a B pestle). Subsequently, 3 M KCl were slowly added to the homogenate to a final concentration of 0.5 M KCl and, after 30 min on ice, centrifuged for 40 min at 14 000 r.p.m. at 4°C to obtain the WCE. To remove DNA from the extract, 0.1 vol of DEAE Sepharose, equilibrated in dialysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 0.2 mM PMSF and 0.5 mM DTT), was added and the mixture was gently rotated at 4°C for 30 min. Extract was cleared by centrifugation at 12 000 r.p.m. for 5 min and dialyzed overnight in dialysis buffer. After centrifugation, extract was aliquoted, snap frozen and stored at –80°C.
Proteins and antibodies
DNA‐PKcs and DNA‐PK were purified from HeLa nuclear extracts as previously described ( 36 ). Baculovirus‐produced, purified, recombinant Ku was a gift of Dr William S. Dynan (University of Georgia at Augusta, Medical College of Georgia, GA). Antibodies against XRCC4 and DNA ligase IV were kindly provided by Dr Steven Jackson (Cambridge University, UK). Mouse monoclonal antibodies against Ku80 (Ab‐3) and DNA‐PKcs (Ab‐2) were purchased from Neomarkers (Union City, CA). Goat polyclonal antibody against Ku70 (c‐19) was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA).
Western blot analysis and immunodepletion
For western blot, cell extracts were electrophoresed on 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gels, transferred to a PVDF membrane and probed by the ECL‐Plus kit as recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences). Signal was detected using the ‘Storm’ or the ‘Typhoon’ (Molecular Dynamics).
For Ku‐immunodepletion, 20 µl of anti‐Ku serum (OY), or normal human serum (NHS) were added to 50 µl of protein A‐Sepharose beads in 250 µl of DB buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 20% glycerol, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT and 0.5 mM PMSF) with 50 µg/ml BSA ( 37 ). Mixture was incubated under constant rotation at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, beads were washed three times with dialysis buffer, and incubated with 100–200 µl HeLa or M059‐J WCE for 2 h at 4°C. After centrifugation, the supernatants were used for quantification of depletion and DNA end joining, whereas the beads were washed three times with dialysis buffer before analysis by western blotting. When necessary, additional depletion cycles were carried out until practically complete depletion was achieved.
Plasmid and oligonucleotides
Supercoiled plasmid pSP65 (3 kb, Promega) was prepared using CsCl 2 /EtBr gradients. It was used as a substrate in DNA end‐joining reactions following digestion with SalI to generate linearized DNA. In some experiments, pSP65 was linearized using other restriction endonucleases as indicated.
Double stranded DNA oligonucleotides used in electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) experiments were generated by annealing two single stranded complementary oligonucleotides. Their names and sequences are: OA 5′‐GGCCGCACGCGTCCACCATGGGGTACAA‐3′ and OB 5′‐GTAGTTGTACCCCATGGTGGACGCGTGC‐3′. OA and OB were annealed as described ( 38 ) to form a duplex DNA with four‐base 5′ overhanging ends.
DNA end joining
End‐joining reactions were performed in 20 mM HEPES–KOH (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl 2 , 80 mM KCl, 1 mM ATP, 1 mM DTT, 0.25 µg of DNA (12.5 ng/µl) and 0–20 µg (0–1 µg/µl) of HeLa, or M059‐J WCE in a final volume of 20 µl at 25°C for 1 h. Reactions were terminated by adding 2 µl of 5% SDS, 2 µl of 0.5 M EDTA and 1 µl of proteinase E (10 mg/ml), then incubated for 1 h at 37°C. One half of the reaction was loaded on a 0.7% agarose gel and run at 45 V (2 V/cm) for 5 h. Gels were stained in SYBR Gold (Molecular Probes) and scanned in a FluorImager (Molecular Dynamics). For quantification of rejoining the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics) was used to calculate the percent of input plasmid found in dimers and other higher order polymers. The values obtained are included in the figures below the corresponding gels.
Wortmannin (Sigma) was prepared in DMSO at 10 mM and diluted in 10% DMSO to 20 µM immediately before use. Diluted wortmannin (1 µl) was added to the reactions and incubated for 10 min at 4°C prior to the addition of ATP and DNA. This pre‐treatment and sequence of reagent addition was found to maximize the effect of wortmannin.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
Standard EMSA was performed to measure Ku activity using a radiolabeled double‐stranded 32mer DNA‐probe prepared as described above. Cell extract was incubated with 0.2 ng end‐labeled DNA probe in DNA binding buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% glycerol) at 25°C for 30 min, then electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer. The gel was dried and analyzed in the ‘Storm’ (Molecular Dynamics). When antibodies were included in the reactions, they were incubated with the complete reaction for 30 min on ice, before addition of the probe.
Assay of DNA‐PK activity
The assay used to measure DNA‐PK activity has been described ( 39 ). Briefly, the peptide EPPLSQEAFADLWKK, corresponding to 11–24 amino acids of human p53 with threonine 18 and serine 20 changed to alanine was used as substrate. Cell extracts are mixed with 200 µM peptide, with or without 10 µg/ml sonicated calf thymus DNA in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl 2 , 50 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EGTA in the final volume of 18 µl. A radioactively‐labeled ATP solution is made by mixing 1 µl of [γ‐ 32 P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol, 10 µCi/µl) in 49 µl unlabeled 5 mM ATP. Reactions are started by adding 2 µl of ATP solution and incubating at 30°C for 30 min; they are stopped by adding 20 µl stop solution (30% acetic acid, 1 mM ATP). Subsequently, 20 µl of the mixture are spotted on Whatman p81 phosphocellulose paper and washed four times in 10% acetic acid for 10 min. 32 P incorporation is measured in a Scintillation Counter (Packard). Results are analyzed to calculate net incorporation of ATP (in pmol) by subtracting incorporation in reactions assembled without DNA (background).
RESULTS
Anti‐Ku antibodies inhibit DNA end joining only in the presence of DNA‐PKcs
We designed experiments to investigate the requirement for Ku in DNA end joining in vitro , as assayed by the ligation of restriction endonuclease‐linearized plasmid in reactions assembled with WCEs. We selected reaction conditions supporting optimal DNA end joining under the assumption that this will enable us to assay for a spectrum of processes operating in the cell for DNA DSB removal, and for the potential role of Ku in these processes. This was important since the present study was designed to explore the operation of alternative, backup pathways of DNA end joining, as well as the potential interplay and hierarchical structure between such pathways. For such a goal, conditions forcing DNA end joining to the operation of a single pathway are not desirable, despite their usefulness in characterizing factors involved in a specific pathway ( 27 , 40 , 41 ).
Because extensive genetic and biochemical studies indicate a direct interaction and cooperation between Ku and DNA‐PKcs ( 42 ), we first examined how the presence of the latter protein influences DNA end joining. For the experiments, we employed WCEs prepared from actively growing DNA‐PK‐proficient HeLa cells, and DNA‐PK‐deficient M059‐J cells ( 43 , 44 ) as described in Materials and Methods. As a first step in the initial characterization of these extracts, we carried out western blotting to assess the abundance of Ku. The results in Figure 1 A indicate that the levels of the two Ku subunits, Ku70 and Ku80, are only slightly lower in extracts (50 µg) of M059‐J cells as compared to extracts of HeLa cells. Other components of the DNA‐PK‐dependent pathway of NHEJ, such as DNA ligase IV, and XRCC4 are present at similar levels in the extracts of these cell lines. As expected, however, DNA‐PKcs is undetectable in extracts of M059‐J cells.
For a functional characterization of Ku activity in extracts of HeLa and M059‐J cells, we carried out EMSA. Figure 1 B shows results of reactions assembled with 0–10 µg extract. Effective DNA binding is observed in reactions assembled with extracts of both cell lines, with a slightly higher activity seen again in extracts of HeLa cells. The slower mobility forms in reactions assembled with extracts of HeLa cells are higher order complexes comprising, in addition to the DNA probe and Ku, probably also DNA‐PKcs, as they are undetectable in reactions assembled with extracts of M059‐J cells.
Having established comparable levels and activity for Ku protein in the extracts of the two cell lines, we studied next DNA end joining using SalI‐digested pSP65 plasmid. The results in Figure 1 C show strong DNA end‐joining activity as a function of HeLa extract concentration resulting in the formation of dimers, trimers and other higher order multimers. Formation of circles (relaxed or supercoiled) is not detectable under the conditions employed here. More than 70% of the input plasmid is ligated in reactions assembled with 20 µg extract suggesting high levels of activity that can be directly quantified by DNA fluorescence. Thus, use of DNA end labeling, Southern blotting or other methods employed to assess low levels of activity, or low amount of DNA substrate are not required. Restriction analysis of reaction products (not shown) indicates an approximately equal representation of tail‐to‐tail and head‐to‐tail end joining, with a slightly smaller fraction of head‐to‐head end joining. Since random end joining would produce twice as many head‐to‐tail products than head‐to‐head or tail‐to‐tail, our results suggest a preference for head‐to‐head and particularly for tail‐to‐tail end joining.
Efficient DNA end joining in a concentration‐dependent manner is also observed in reactions assembled with extracts of M059‐J cells. Under the conditions employed here, 20 µg extracts of M059‐J cells also rejoin >70% of the input plasmid. Thus, despite the absence of DNA‐PKcs, DNA end‐joining activity remains high. It has been previously shown that when the concentration of Mg 2+ is adjusted to 0.5 mM (compared to 10 mM in our reactions), only DNA‐PK‐dependent DNA end joining occurs ( 40 ). At this low Mg 2+ concentration DNA end joining is reduced by >90% ( 8 ). As mentioned above, it is our working hypothesis that reactions assembled at Mg 2+ concentrations allowing optimal DNA end joining are preferable for the goals of our study. In addition, the concentration of Mg 2+ employed is closer to that present in the nucleus of the cell: 2–4 mM during interphase and 4–17 mM during M‐phase ( 45 ). Restriction analysis of the reaction products (not shown) indicates an approximately equal representation for tail‐to‐tail, head‐to‐tail and head‐to‐head end joining, and thus similar end‐joining preferences to those found with HeLa cell extracts. Taken together, the above results indicate similar levels of Ku and DNA end‐joining activities in extracts of HeLa and M059‐J cells, despite the absence of DNA‐PKcs from the latter.
As a first step in the evaluation of the role of Ku in DNA end joining in vitro we employed as a tool sera from individuals with polymyositis‐scleroderma overlap syndrome. These sera contain antibodies against Ku that are known to inhibit signal joint formation during in vitro V(D)J recombination ( 46 ) and in vitro DNA end joining ( 37 , 47 ). Increasing amounts of OY serum were added to reactions containing extract, but no substrate DNA or ATP, and were incubated at 25°C for 10 min. Subsequently, DNA end joining was initiated by adding DNA and ATP and reactions were incubated at 25°C for 1 h. In reactions assembled with extracts of HeLa cells, OY serum strongly inhibits DNA end joining (Fig. 2 A), whereas a control serum from a normal individual (NHS) is without a significant effect (Fig. 2 B). Figure 2 C shows a quantitative evaluation of the above results, after normalization to the untreated controls, for reactions assembled with OY serum (closed circles), or NHS (closed triangles). At 0.1 µl per reaction, OY serum inhibits >80% of the DNA end‐joining activity, whereas NHS has no measurable effect. Higher amounts do not further enhance this effect suggesting a component in DNA end joining that is refractory to inhibition by this antibody. EMSA demonstrates an interaction between Ku and antibodies present in the serum (supershift) in the range of concentrations used for DNA end joining, confirming an interaction between antibodies in the OY serum and the Ku antigen (results not shown). Notably, antibodies do not prevent end binding of Ku. These results are in line with an involvement of Ku in DNA end joining and suggest that, when present in the extract, Ku engages in the reaction. However, interaction with antibodies inhibits the normal functions of the protein and blocks DNA end joining without preventing end binding.
Treatment of extracts of M059‐J cells with OY serum, under practically identical conditions, leads to different results. Although some inhibition is observed with increasing amounts of OY serum (Fig. 2 A), the inhibition is significantly reduced compared to reactions assembled with HeLa cell extracts. Furthermore, a small effect is seen in reactions assembled with NHS (Fig. 2 B) and when the results obtained in these two sets of reactions are directly compared quantitatively (Fig. 3 C, open symbols) the specific effect of OY serum (open triangles) is only slightly larger than the non‐specific effect of NHS (open circles). Since the results in Figure 1 indicate comparable abundance and activity for Ku protein in HeLa and M059‐J cell extracts, the reduced inhibition in extracts of the latter cells, can be attributed to the absence of DNA‐PKcs. Thus, DNA‐PKcs stabilizes the interactions of Ku with the DNA and directs end joining to a Ku dependent pathway.
DNA end joining in Ku‐depleted extracts
To further evaluate the role of Ku in DNA end joining, we tested extracts of HeLa and M059‐J cells after immunodepletion with OY serum. After two cycles of depletion by immunoprecipitation, Ku is barely detectable in extracts of either HeLa or M059‐J cells (Fig. 3 A) and is found practically exclusively in the beads. Similar treatment with NHS has no effect on the level of Ku in the extract of either cell line. The depletion of Ku indicated in Figure 3 A is corroborated by the DNA binding results in Figure 3 B and the DNA‐PK activity measurements in Figure 3 C. Strong gel shift is observed in control cell extracts, as well as in extracts treated with NHS. On the other hand, DNA binding is not detectable in Ku‐depleted extracts of either HeLa or M059‐J cells. Similarly robust DNA‐PK activity is detected in HeLa cell extracts only before Ku depletion (Fig. 3 C). Thus, by several measures non‐detectable levels of Ku remain in the depleted extracts.
Despite the practically complete removal of Ku, DNA end joining is not diminished in reactions assembled with depleted HeLa cell extracts (Fig. 3 D). This observation suggests the presence in HeLa cell extracts of factors efficiently catalyzing DNA end joining in the absence of Ku, probably via an alternative DNA end‐joining pathway. The results of Figures 2 and 3 in aggregate suggest, on the one hand, a dominant engagement of Ku in the end‐joining reaction, manifested by the strong inhibition by Ku‐specific antibodies, and on the other hand, the ability of the cell to perform efficient end joining in the absence of Ku. These apparently contradictory observations are analyzed in more detail in the Discussion.
To confirm that the residual end joining observed in depleted extracts is not due to remaining traces of Ku, we tested the effect of OY serum. The results in Figure 3 E demonstrate that OY serum has only a very small effect in reactions assembled with depleted extract, but inhibits almost completely end joining in reactions assembled with non‐treated extract. Notably, addition of recombinant Ku to reactions assembled with depleted extract rescues the sensitivity of the end‐joining reaction to OY serum. These results are consistent with a quantitative removal of Ku from the extract and a specific function of OY serum through interaction with Ku.
A small increase in DNA end‐joining activity is occasionally observed after Ku depletion, implying that Ku may actually inhibit the alternative Ku‐independent pathway. To examine this possibility we supplemented Ku‐depleted HeLa cell extracts with recombinant Ku. The results in Figure 3 F show that high Ku concentrations have a strongly inhibitory effect on DNA end joining and suggest that at physiological concentrations, Ku may actually suppress alternative pathways of DNA end joining. On the other hand, it is also possible that at high concentrations, DNA becomes overloaded with Ku, which interrupts subsequent productive interactions with other factors and stops the normal progression of the repair reaction. Very similar observations are also made in reactions assembled using extracts of M059‐J cells, although recombinant Ku is less inhibitory than in HeLa cells at similar concentrations (Fig. 3 F). These observations are also in line with the operation of alternative, Ku‐independent, pathways of DNA end joining operating in the absence of DNA‐PKcs, and reinforce the important role of DNA‐PKcs in the functions of Ku.
Fidelity of end joining and joining of different DNA ends in Ku‐depleted extracts
Although the results presented above suggest efficient DNA end joining in the absence of Ku and DNA‐PKcs, it remains open whether other aspects of the reaction, for example end‐preservation, are altered in the absence of these repair factors. This is particularly relevant, as Ku may protect DNA ends from processing by nucleases, and there is evidence that it can function as an alignment factor during DNA end joining ( 28 , 29 ). To address this question we evaluated fidelity of end joining of SalI‐digested plasmid by isolating products and subjecting them to re‐digestion with the same restriction endonuclease. Figure 4 A shows the results obtained. Efficient and error‐free DNA end joining is observed in reactions assembled with HeLa cell extracts, with 92% of the products redigested with SalI (8% undigested). This indicates a high probability for preservation during end joining of the restriction endonuclease recognition sequence. Neither the efficiency of the reaction nor the digestibility of the products are changing after Ku‐depletion, suggesting that the fidelity of end joining remains high and similar to that of non‐depleted extracts. Similar results are also obtained in reactions assembled with extracts of M059‐J cells (Fig. 4 A), suggesting that DNA‐PKcs, in the presence or absence of Ku, is not altering the joining fidelity of this type of DNA ends.
It is well documented that the efficiency of in vitro DNA end joining is dependent on the type of ends. To investigate whether Ku contributes to this dependence, we used different restriction endonucleases to generate blunt ends, or ends with 5′ or 3′ overhangs (Fig. 4 B), and evaluated end joining in extracts of HeLa or M059‐J cells, as well as in Ku‐depleted extracts of M059‐J cells. The results obtained with HeLa cells are shown in Figure 4 C. It is evident that 5′ protruding DNA ends (protruding single strands, PSS) generated by SalI are joined with the highest efficiency (69% substrate conversion). Although BamHI also produces 5′ protruding ends, substrate conversion is only 30%, mainly as a result of a reduction in trimers and other higher order forms. An even lower efficiency of DNA end joining (10% substrate conversion) is observed with the 3′ protruding DNA ends produced by PstI, and substrate conversion drops to 8% for blunt ends generated by SmaI.
Extracts of M059‐J cells join DNA ends generated by SalI, BamHI and SmaI with efficiency practically indistinguishable from that of HeLa cell extracts. However, ends generated by PstI are rejoined nearly five times more efficiently than in HeLa cell extracts (Fig. 4 D). Depletion of Ku from M059‐J cell extracts leaves joining of ends generated by SalI and PstI unchanged as compared to non‐depleted extracts, increases slightly (from 30 to 50%) joining of BamHI ends, but increases >3‐fold (from 10 to 30%) joining of blunt ends produced by SmaI. Thus, in the absence of Ku and DNA‐PKcs, the end‐preference for DNA end joining of normal cell extracts is nearly eliminated, suggesting that these factors partly determine the end‐specificity of the rejoining reaction, probably by restricting the joining of certain types of ends. We have no information on the fidelity of end joining for the different types of ends assayed in the experiments described above.
Ku is essential for wortmannin inhibition of DNA end joining
Wortmannin was originally characterized as a PI‐3 kinase inhibitor, but was later shown to also inhibit at higher concentrations other kinases of the PI‐3 kinase family, such as DNA‐PK, ATM and ATR ( 48 , 49 ). Wortmannin inhibits in vitro DNA end joining in reactions similar to those presented above, and this observation is interpreted as an indication for dependence of the reaction on DNA‐PK. We investigated the role of Ku in this inhibition. Reaction mixtures containing extracts as indicated were treated for 10 min with 1 µM wortmannin or DMSO, prior to the addition of plasmid DNA and ATP to initiate the reaction. Figure 5 A shows that, in agreement with previous observations, 1 µM wortmannin completely inhibits DNA end joining in reactions assembled with extracts of HeLa cells. This effect is likely to be entirely and exclusively due to the presence of DNA‐PKcs in the extract, as the inhibitor has no effect on DNA end joining in extracts of M059‐J cells that lack DNA‐PKcs. Thus, although active end joining occurs in M059‐J cells that lack DNA‐PKcs, end joining initiated in the presence of this kinase requires this activity for completion and implies involvement of DNA‐PKcs in the overall reaction.
We examined the role of Ku in wortmannin‐induced inhibition of DNA end joining by supplementing Ku‐depleted M059‐J cell extracts with purified DNA‐PKcs and/or Ku and evaluating DNA end joining in the presence or absence of drug. As expected, Ku‐depleted extracts of M059‐J cells support effective DNA end joining that remains unaffected by wortmannin treatment. Thus, Ku‐depleted extracts of M059‐J cells respond to wortmannin as non‐depleted extracts of the same cells. Addition of 100 ng purified DNA‐PKcs to the reaction produces no detectable effect on DNA end joining and leaves the extracts refractory to inhibition by wortmannin. However, addition of 100 ng Ku together with 100 ng DNA‐PKcs produces a slight inhibition in DNA end joining (likely an effect of Ku, see above) but render the reaction fully sensitive to wortmannin. Thus, Ku is required for wortmannin‐induced inhibition of DNA end joining in the presence of DNA‐PKcs.
The inhibition of DNA end joining by wortmannin can be explained as a blockade of the end joining process by the inactive kinase that remains trapped at the DNA ends and prevents further processing by the DNA‐PK‐dependent pathway ( 22 ), or the diversion of the end joining process to DNA‐PK‐independent backup pathways. To examine whether other factors present in the extract and involved in DNA end joining are also compromised in their function by this inhibition, for example by binding to the inactivated DNA‐PK complex, and to test the status of DNA‐PK‐independent pathways of DNA end joining in extracts treated with wortmannin, we carried out the following experiment: reactions were assembled with extracts of HeLa cells and treated with 1 µM wortmannin, or the equivalent amount of DMSO, in the absence of substrate DNA and ATP, for 10 min at 25°C. Subsequently, different amounts of dsDNA (a 32mer) were added (Fig. 5 C) and reactions were further incubated at 25°C for 10 min. Finally, substrate DNA and ATP were added to initiate end joining and reaction mixtures incubated at 25°C for 1 h. We inquired whether the double stranded 32mer would titer the inactive DNA‐PK but leave alternative pathways of end joining in an operational state. Figure 5 D shows the results obtained. Increasing amounts of dsDNA has no detectable inhibitory effect on the DNA end‐joining reaction in the absence of wortmannin in the range between 0.25 and 1 pmol despite the expected titration of Ku and DNA‐PKcs. This is in line with the activity measured in the extracts in the absence of Ku or DNA‐PKcs. In reactions assembled with wortmannin‐treated extracts no DNA end joining is observed in the control, in line with the above‐presented results. However, as the amount of dsDNA added in the reaction increases, DNA end joining takes place and at 0.5 pmol dsDNA, end joining is at levels similar to those of untreated controls. Thus, increasing amounts of dsDNA progressively allows plasmid DNA end joining in wortmannin‐treated extracts, probably by tittering inhibitory DNA‐PK complexes that block access to the plasmid ends of components of alternative end‐joining pathways. Of note, the presence of dsDNA up to 1 pmol is not affecting end joining by alternative pathways suggesting that blunt DNA ends do not deplete extract of these activities and that there is an abundance of such activities in the extract. Some inhibition of DNA end joining is however observed above 2 pmol dsDNA (not shown). Addition of ssDNA in the reactions under similar conditions does not relieve wortmannin inhibition (Fig. 5 E), confirming a requirement for dsDNA and the role of DNA‐PK in wortmannin‐induced inhibition of end joining.
DISCUSSION
Genetic studies quantitatively evaluating the kinetics of rejoining of radiation‐induced DNA DSBs in wild‐type cells of higher eukaryotes, in mutants deficient in DNA‐PKcs, Ku or DNA ligase IV, as well as after treatment with wortmannin provide evidence for the operation of at least two pathways of NHEJ with distinct properties that we have termed D‐NHEJ and B‐NHEJ (see Introduction). D‐NHEJ is fast (t 1/2 : 5– 30 min), requires DNA‐PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV and probably XRCC4 and rejoins DNA ends without excessive degradation ( 12 ). B‐NHEJ on the other hand is slow (t 1/2 : 2– 20 h), may involve degradation of DNA ends ( 12 ), and utilizes as of yet unidentified components. The two pathways operate in a complementary fashion and cooperate to remove IR‐induced DNA DSBs in a well‐defined hierarchical order. D‐NHEJ is dominant and normally removes the majority of DNA DSBs. When D‐NHEJ is compromised as a result of mutation in a participating factor, by inhibitors, or by the absence of an essential component from the vicinity of the DNA DSB, B‐NHEJ acts as a backup to remove practically completely DNA DSBs, albeit with slower kinetics ( 9 ). The biochemical experiments presented in the previous section extend and complement the genetic studies by reproducing several important, albeit not all, of the features of these pathways.
Alternative pathways of NHEJ
Active end joining is observed in Ku‐depleted extracts of HeLa cells, in extracts from M059‐J cells that lack DNA‐PKcs, or in Ku‐depleted extracts of M059‐J cells that lack both DNA‐PKcs and Ku. Thus, the absence of key components of D‐NHEJ is not compromising end joining in line with the operation of an alternative, DNA‐PK‐independent pathway that may be operationally equivalent to the genetically defined B‐NHEJ ( 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 13 ).
Extensive literature addressing DNA end joining from a different angle also points to the operation of alternative pathways. Seminal work by Roth and Wilson first demonstrated the extraordinary ability of mammalian cells to join with similar efficiency matched or mismatched ends of transfected DNA either with a pathway utilizing direct ligation, or a pathway relying on terminal homologies of a few nucleotides ( 50 , 51 ). With the characterization of mutants deficient in components of D‐NHEJ this work was extended to investigate the roles of specific factors in the end joining process. In agreement with the biochemical data presented here, end joining of transfected DNA remained at levels similar to those of wild‐type controls in cells deficient in DNA‐PKcs ( 52 – 54 ), Ku ( 54 , 55 ), XRCC4 ( 54 , 55 ) or DNA ligase IV ( 54 ) pointing to pathways operating efficiently in the absence of these proteins. Notably, when the generated junctions were examined by sequencing, a clear shift was observed in the mutants from homology independent to homology dependent end joining ( 54 , 55 ).
Also, in vitro data obtained using assays similar to the one employed here provided evidence for the operation of alternative pathways of DNA end joining and have implicated Ku in the fidelity of the process, as well as in the inhibition of the pathway utilizing microhomologies ( 28 , 37 , 54 , 56 ). In addition, V(D)J recombination, despite its stricter dependence on DNA‐PK and DNA ligase IV/XRCC4, can also utilize alternative, DNA‐PK‐independent pathways that rely on microhomologies for the formation of non‐standard V(D)J recombination products ( 54 ). Finally, alternative pathways of DNA DSB end joining have been suggested from genetic studies involving the generation of DNA ligase IV and Ku70‐deficient DT40 chicken B‐cells ( 57 ). Thus the evidence for alternative pathways of NHEJ is ample and quite diverse. There are distinct parallels between microhomology‐ dependent end joining and B‐NHEJ that require further study. These studies will be benefit substantially by a biochemical characterization of B‐NHEJ.
The dominant nature of D‐NHEJ
D‐NHEJ dominates NHEJ in vivo as long as its key factors are not compromised by either genetic mutation or chemical inhibition. This implies that DNA ends generated either endogenously, or by exogenous agents such as IR and other DNA damaging agents, are quickly bound and processed by factors involved in this pathway. Indeed this appears to be the case for both Ku and DNA‐PKcs in the in vitro studies presented here (Figs 2 and 5 ). These observations suggest a priority binding of these factors to DNA ends, in line with the documented in vivo dominance of D‐NHEJ and the known properties of DNA‐PKcs and Ku ( 3 , 58 ). Inhibition of DNA end joining in vitro by antibodies against Ku has also been reported for reactions assembled with extracts of Xenopus eggs ( 37 ), and inhibition of DNA end joining by wortmannin in extracts of human cells and Xenopus eggs ( 22 , 59 ). Thus, the results presented here are not specific for the model systems and the conditions employed.
Of note, the results show a strong functional interdependence between DNA‐PKcs and Ku on DNA end joining. Thus, inhibition of end joining by anti‐Ku antibodies is not effective in the absence of DNA‐PKcs suggesting that the kinase facilitates the stalling of subsequent steps in the end joining reaction despite the fact that a ligase other than DNA ligase IV must be employed ( 8 ). A recent report demonstrates loss of DNA‐PKcs requirement in reactions assembled with purified DNA ligase IV/XRCC4, Ku and a fraction containing Mre11/Rad50/NBS1 ( 41 ). The significance of this observation for our results is not clear at present.
Further indication for coordination in the functions of DNA‐PKcs and Ku provides the observation that these factors impose restrictions in the joining efficiency between different types of ends. The bias observed here against joining of 3′ protruding ends in the presence of Ku, although not always detectable ( 40 ), if active in vivo may be of consequence for the 3′ protruding strands generated during the processing of DNA ends by HDR. For example, it may reduce a non‐productive competition between NHEJ and HDR. The same results also suggest that the role of Ku as an alignment factor ( 28 , 29 ) depends on the types of DNA ends presented to the end‐joining machinery, and that this function is modulated by additional factors in the extract. This is probably why Ku inhibits joining of blunt ends in our setting, whereas it facilitates joining of blunt ends in reactions assembled with purified DNA ligases ( 25 ).
The model in Figure 6 recapitulates the interpretation of the results presented here; it is a further development of a previously proposed model ( 9 ) and addresses the processing of IR‐induced DNA DSBs by D‐NHEJ and B‐NHEJ in the context of chromatin. In the presence of Ku and DNA‐PKcs, DNA ends are quickly captured and chromatin structure is locally altered (not shown) to facilitate synapsis. This is the rate‐limiting step of the reaction and is considered to occur close to the nuclear matrix mediated by a complex set of protein–protein interactions between DNA‐PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4, histones and other unidentified factors. End joining is catalyzed by DNA ligase IV. The high speed of the process and local changes in chromatin structure facilitate joining of correct ends and suppress the formation of chromosome aberrations. In the absence of Ku or DNA‐PKcs, DNA ends are not captured and local changes in chromatin structure fail to occur. Ends remain open and are processed by components of B‐NHEJ with slow kinetics (hours) because of inefficient synapsis at random locations in the nucleus. The long‐lived DNA ends may interact with other DNA ends in the vicinity, generated by IR or other processes, causing the formation of chromosome aberrations. In this model, quick capture and local processing of the DNA ends through optimized protein–protein interactions and chromatin conformation changes is the central mechanism by which joining errors are prevented during D‐NHEJ. Although this model awaits rigorous testing it is relevant that affinity chromatography with ATC clusters, typically found in scaffold or matrix attachment regions, almost exclusively binds a complex containing poly(ADP‐ribose) polymerase and DNA‐PK ( 60 ).
Kinetics and fidelity of B‐NHEJ in vivo and in vitro
The kinetic advantage of D‐NHEJ in vivo (see Introduction and above) is not reproduced in vitro , where both pathways operate with similar kinetics. We attribute this difference to the loss of the kinetic advantage in the synapsis step of D‐NHEJ (see model in Fig. 6 ), as synapsis may not be rate limiting at the high DNA concentrations used in vitro . Although our results indicate no reduction in end‐joining efficiency in the absence of Ku, other experiments show a reduction in circle formation ( 28 , 37 , 61 ). The significance of circle formation in in vitro DNA end‐joining assays and its correlation, if any, with in vivo rejoining of DNA DSBs remains to be established.
The in vitro assay utilized in the present study, as well as in previous reports ( 37 , 40 , 62 ), fails to reproduce the reduced fidelity of B‐NHEJ in vivo (see Introduction) and the cancer prone nature of alternative pathways of NHEJ in mice ( 63 – 65 ). We propose that this may also be a reflection of the artificial kinetic advantage of B‐NHEJ under the in vitro conditions employed here. Indeed, a fidelity reduction has been reported in the absence of Ku under conditions supporting end joining less efficiently than in our experiments ( 28 , 56 ). It is possible that even in vitro , slow end joining allows processing of the ends by an exonuclease (likely a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease) causing a reduction in fidelity and that this processing is modulated by Ku. That reduced fidelity in the absence of Ku may be seen in in vitro systems only under conditions of kinetic disadvantage is also supported by the high fidelity observed in experiments evaluating end joining of transfected plasmid DNA in Ku‐deficient cells ( 55 ).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Work was supported by grants RO1 CA42026, RO1 CA56706 awarded from NIH, DHHS, and a grant from the IFORES program of the University of Duisburg‐Essen.
References
Jackson,S.P. (
Doherty,A.J. and Jackson,S.P. (
Thompson,L.H. and Schild,D. (
DiBiase,S., Zeng,Z.‐C., Chen,R., Hyslop,P.A., Curran,W.,Jr and Iliakis,G. (
Wang,H., Zeng,Z.‐C., Bui,T.‐A., Sonoda,E., Takata,M., Takeda,S. and Iliakis,G. (
Nevaldine,B., Longo,J.A. and Hahn,P.J. (
Wang,H., Zhao‐Chong,Z., Perrault,A.R., Cheng,X., Qin,W. and Iliakis,G. (
DiBiase,S.J., Zeng,Z.‐C., Chen,R., Hyslop,T., Curran,W.J.,Jr and Iliakis,G. (
Takata,M., Sasaki,M.S., Sonoda,E., Morrison,C., Hashimoto,M., Utsumi,H., Yamaguchi‐Iwai,Y., Shinohara,A. and Takeda,S. (
Sonoda,E., Sasaki,M.S., Buerstedde,J.‐M., Bezzubova,O., Shinohara,A., Ogawa,H., Takata,M., Yamaguchi‐Iwai,Y. and Takeda,S. (
Loebrich,M., Rydberg,B. and Cooper,P.K. (
Asaad,N.A., Zeng,Z.‐C., Guan,J., Thacker,J. and Iliakis,G. (
Dynan,W.S. and Yoo,S. (
Blier,P.R., Griffith,A.J., Craft,J. and Hardin,J.A. (
Falzon,M., Fewell,J.W. and Kuff,E.L. (
Pang,D., Yoo,S., Dynan,W.S., Jung,M. and Dritschilo,A. (
Walker,J.R., Corpina,R.A. and Goldberg,J. (
de Vries,E., van Driel,W., Bergsma,W.G., Arnberg,A.C. and van der Vliet,P.C. (
Zhang,W.‐W. and Yaneva,M. (
Bliss,T.M. and Lane,D.P. (
Calsou,P., Frit,P., Humbert,O., Muller,C., Chen,D.J. and Salles,B. (
Dvir,A., Peterson,S.R., Knuth,M.W., Lu,H. and Dynan,W.S. (
Gottlieb,T.M. and Jackson,S.P. (
Ramsden,D.A. and Gellert,M. (
McElhinny,S.A., Snowden,C.M., McCarville,J. and Ramsden,D. (
Lee,K.‐J., Huang,J., Takeda,Y. and Dynan,W.S. (
Feldmann,E., Schmiemann,V., Goedecke,W., Reichenberger,S. and Pfeiffer,P. (
Thode,S., Schafer,A., Pfeiffer,P. and Vielmetter,W. (
Bianchi,A. and de Lange,T. (
Hsu,H.L., Gilley,D., Galande,S.A., Hande,M.P., Allen,B., Kim,S.H., Li,G.C., Campisi,J., Kohwi‐Shigematsu,T. and Chen,D.J. (
Boulton,S.J. and Jackson,S.P. (
Porter,S.E., Greenwell,P.W., Ritchie,K.B. and Petes,T.D. (
Hartley,K.O., Gell,D., Smith,G.C.M., Zhang,H., Divecha,N., Connelly,M.A., Admon,A., Lees‐Miller,S.P., Anderson,C.W. and Jackson,S.P. (
Labhart,P. (
Hammarsten,O. and Chu,G. (
Lees‐Miller,S.P., Sakaguchi,K., Ullrich,S.J., Appella,E. and Anderson,C.W. (
Baumann,P. and West,S.C. (
Huang,J. and Dynan,W.S. (
Smith,G.C.M. and Jackson,S.P. (
Lees‐Miller,S.P., Godbout,R., Chan,D.W., Weinfeld,M., Day,R.S.,III, Barron,G.M. and Allalunis‐Turner,J. (
Allalunis‐Turner,M.J., Barron,G.M., Day,R.S., Dobler,K.D. and Mirzayans,R. (
Strick,R., Strissel,P.L., Gavrilov,K. and Levi‐Setti,R. (
Cortes,P., Weis‐Garcia,F., Misulovin,Z., Nussenzweig,A., Lai,J.‐S., Li,G., Nussenzweig,M.C. and Baltimore,D. (
Labhart,P. (
Powis,G., Bonjouklian,R., Berggren,M.M., Gallegos,A., Abraham,R., Ashendel,C., Zalkow,L., Matter,W.F., Dodge,J., Grindley,G. et al. (
Sarkaria,J.N., Tibbetts,R.S., Busby,E.C., Kennedy,A.P., Hill,D.E. and Abraham,R.T. (
Roth,D.B., Porter,T.M. and Wilson,J.H. (
Roth,D.B. and Wilson,J.H. (
Chang,C., Biedermann,K.A., Mezzina,M. and Brown,J.M. (
Harrington,J., Hsieh,C.L., Gerton,J., Bosma,G. and Lieber,M.R. (
Verkaik,N.S., Esveldt‐van Lange,R.E.E., van Heemst,D., Brüggenwirth,H.T., Hoeijmakers,J.H.J., Zdzienicka,M.Z. and van Gent,D.C. (
Kabotyanski,E.B., Gomelsky,L., Han,J.‐O., Stamato,T.D. and Roth,D.B. (
Chen,S., Inamdar,K.V., Pfeiffer,P., Feldmann,E., Hannah,M.F., Yu,Y., Lee,J.‐W., Zhou,T., Lees‐Miller,S.P. and Povirk,L.F. (
Adachi,N., Ishino,T., Ishii,Y., Takeda,S. and Koyama,H. (
Featherstone,C. and Jackson,S.P. (
Gu,X.‐Y., Weinfeld,M.A. and Povirk,L.F. (
Galande,S. and Kohwi‐Shigematsu,T. (
Tzung,T.‐Y. and Rünger,T.M. (
Gu,X.‐Y., Bennett,R.A.O. and Povirk,L.F. (
Zhu,C., Mills,K.D., Ferguson,D.O., Lee,C., Manis,J., Fleming,J., Gao,Y., Morton,C.C. and Alt,F.W. (
Gao,Y., Ferguson,D.O., Xie,W., Manis,J.P., Sekiguchi,J.A., Frank,K.M., Chaudhuri,J., Horner,J., DePinho,R.A. and Alt,F.W. (
Comments